From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xenproject.org>,
Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>,
xen-api@lists.xenproject.org, minios-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
committers@xenproject.org, mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
win-pv-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] Add guide on Communication Best Practice
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9ed8408-cd85-6ee9-44a4-2c2dda396f66@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b1bad1b-f381-869d-95a8-036a236a2b31@citrix.com>
On 07.10.2019 18:13, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/27/19 10:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 26.09.2019 21:39, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> +### Verbose vs. terse
>>> +Due to the time it takes to review and compose code reviewer, reviewers often adopt a
>>> +terse style. It is not unusual to see review comments such as
>>> +> typo
>>> +> s/resions/regions/
>>> +> coding style
>>> +> coding style: brackets not needed
>>> +etc.
>>> +
>>> +Terse code review style has its place and can be productive for both the reviewer and
>>> +the author. However, overuse can come across as unfriendly, lacking empathy and
>>> +can thus create a negative impression with the author of a patch. This is in particular
>>> +true, when you do not know the author or the author is a newcomer. Terse
>>> +communication styles can also be perceived as rude in some cultures.
>>
>> And another remark here: Not being terse in situations like the ones
>> enumerated as examples above is a double waste of the reviewer's time:
>
> FWIW I don't think this document prohibits terse replies. It points out
> that they can come across as unfriendly, and they can be perceived as
> rude in some cultures; both of which are true. It then *recommends*
> that reviewers compensate for it in a review opening (i.e., once per
> patch / series) which expresses appreciation; which is both helpful and
> relatively low cost.
>
> The point of the opening is to set the tone. If you start out with
> something positive, and ends with "thanks", then a long series of terse
> comments is more likely to be read as simply being efficient. If the
> entire review consists of nothing but criticism or terse comments, it's
> more likely to be read as annoyance on the part of the reviewer.
>
>> They shouldn't even need to make such comments, especially not many
>> times for a single patch (see your mention of "overuse"). I realize
>> we still have no automated mechanism to check style aspects, but
>> anybody can easily look over their patches before submitting them.
>> And for an occasional issue I think a terse reply is quite reasonable
>> to have.
>
> This sort of sounds like you are *intending* to express annoyance?
Implicitly by being terse, yes. I've been trying to avoid expressing
such explicitly, but I have to admit there are (luckily only few)
cases where I find it pretty hard to stay away.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-26 19:39 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Code of Conduct + Extra Guides and Best Practices Lars Kurth
2019-09-26 19:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/6] Import v1.4 of Contributor Covenant CoC Lars Kurth
2019-10-07 11:06 ` George Dunlap
2019-10-07 11:27 ` Lars Kurth
2019-09-26 19:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] Xen Project Code of Conduct Lars Kurth
2019-09-26 19:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/6] Add Communication Guide Lars Kurth
2019-09-26 19:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] Add Code Review Guide Lars Kurth
2019-11-28 0:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-11-28 10:09 ` Jan Beulich
2019-11-28 13:06 ` Lars Kurth
2019-11-28 13:37 ` Jan Beulich
2019-11-28 14:02 ` Lars Kurth
2019-11-28 18:20 ` [Xen-devel] [MirageOS-devel] " Rich Persaud
2019-11-29 1:39 ` Lars Kurth
2019-12-05 23:41 ` Lars Kurth
2019-12-06 9:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-12-09 11:02 ` Lars Kurth
2019-12-09 15:58 ` Lars Kurth
2019-11-28 18:12 ` Rich Persaud
2019-11-29 1:50 ` Lars Kurth
2019-11-28 18:19 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-09-26 19:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] Add guide on Communication Best Practice Lars Kurth
2019-09-27 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-27 9:53 ` Lars Kurth
2019-09-27 9:14 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-27 10:17 ` Lars Kurth
2019-09-27 10:22 ` Lars Kurth
2019-09-27 14:19 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-07 16:13 ` George Dunlap
2019-10-08 7:29 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-11-28 1:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-11-29 0:02 ` Lars Kurth
2019-10-07 15:29 ` George Dunlap
2019-11-28 0:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-11-29 0:00 ` Lars Kurth
2019-09-26 19:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] Added Resolving Disagreement Lars Kurth
2019-11-28 0:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-11-28 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
2019-11-28 18:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-11-29 2:10 ` Lars Kurth
2019-11-29 1:42 ` Lars Kurth
2019-10-24 7:51 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Code of Conduct + Extra Guides and Best Practices Felipe Huici
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9ed8408-cd85-6ee9-44a4-2c2dda396f66@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=committers@xenproject.org \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@xenproject.org \
--cc=minios-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=mirageos-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=win-pv-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-api@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).