From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] VT-d: Don't assume register-based invalidation is always supported
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:38:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4b3ad3b-16b9-5e42-c7a6-0c5c81b1f392@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401200606.48752-1-chao.gao@intel.com>
On 01.04.2020 22:06, Chao Gao wrote:
> According to Intel VT-d SPEC rev3.3 Section 6.5, Register-based Invalidation
> isn't supported by Intel VT-d version 6 and beyond.
>
> This hardware change impacts following two scenarios: admin can disable
> queued invalidation via 'qinval' cmdline and use register-based interface;
> VT-d switches to register-based invalidation when queued invalidation needs
> to be disabled, for example, during disabling x2apic or during system
> suspension or after enabling queued invalidation fails.
>
> To deal with this hardware change, if register-based invalidation isn't
> supported, queued invalidation cannot be disabled through Xen cmdline; and
> if queued invalidation has to be disabled temporarily in some scenarios,
> VT-d won't switch to register-based interface but use some dummy functions
> to catch errors in case there is any invalidation request issued when queued
> invalidation is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
In principle (with a minor nit further down)
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
However, ...
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - verify system suspension and resumption with this patch applied
> - don't fall back to register-based interface if enabling qinval failed.
> see the change in init_vtd_hw().
> - remove unnecessary "queued_inval_supported" variable
> - constify the "struct vtd_iommu *" of has_register_based_invalidation()
> - coding-style changes
... while this suggests this is v2 of a recently sent patch, the
submission is dated a little over a year ago. This is confusing.
It is additionally confusing that there were two copies of it in
my inbox, despite mails coming from a list normally getting
de-duplicated somewhere at our end (I believe).
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> @@ -1193,6 +1193,14 @@ int __init iommu_alloc(struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd)
>
> iommu->cap = dmar_readq(iommu->reg, DMAR_CAP_REG);
> iommu->ecap = dmar_readq(iommu->reg, DMAR_ECAP_REG);
> + iommu->version = dmar_readl(iommu->reg, DMAR_VER_REG);
> +
> + if ( !iommu_qinval && !has_register_based_invalidation(iommu) )
> + {
> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX "IOMMU %d: cannot disable Queued Invalidation.\n",
> + iommu->index);
Here (and at least once more yet further down): We don't normally end
log messages with a full stop. Easily addressable while committing, of
course.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-01 20:06 [PATCH v2] VT-d: Don't assume register-based invalidation is always supported Chao Gao
2021-04-20 11:38 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-20 12:14 ` Julien Grall
2021-04-20 12:25 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-20 12:39 ` Julien Grall
2021-04-20 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-20 13:00 ` Julien Grall
2021-04-20 12:41 ` Chao Gao
2021-04-20 15:08 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-20 15:38 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-20 16:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-04-21 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 11:31 ` Chao Gao
2021-04-25 1:20 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4b3ad3b-16b9-5e42-c7a6-0c5c81b1f392@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).