docs.lists.yoctoproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
To: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
	docs@lists.yoctoproject.org,
	bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [docs] [PATCH 1/2] documentation: update sources mirror URL
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 16:41:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35bcdc42-9ed6-5232-c94e-c69f3fd7af94@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211005224513.14134-1-jdmason@kudzu.us>

Hi Jon

Thanks for the proposed update !

On 10/6/21 12:45 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
> The URL for the sources mirror no longer works.  Update to the new
> location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
> ---
>  documentation/ref-manual/faq.rst       | 15 ++++++++-------
>  documentation/ref-manual/variables.rst |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/faq.rst b/documentation/ref-manual/faq.rst
> index d3a603d4a438..f06abc84ee6f 100644
> --- a/documentation/ref-manual/faq.rst
> +++ b/documentation/ref-manual/faq.rst
> @@ -302,10 +302,10 @@ attempt before any others by adding something like the following to the
>  ``local.conf`` configuration file::
>  
>     PREMIRRORS:prepend = "\
> -       git://.*/.* http://www.yoctoproject.org/sources/ \n \
> -       ftp://.*/.* http://www.yoctoproject.org/sources/ \n \
> -       http://.*/.* http://www.yoctoproject.org/sources/ \n \
> -       https://.*/.* http://www.yoctoproject.org/sources/ \n"
> +       git://.*/.* http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/ \n \
> +       ftp://.*/.* http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/ \n \
> +       http://.*/.* http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/ \n \
> +       https://.*/.* http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/ \n"


Hey, doesn't it sound weird to show an example that proposes to use http
when https is usually recommended?
What about proposing https://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/
instead?

Or we don't really care because we use source checksums anyway?

Just my two cents. I don't mind accepting the patch as is.

Thanks again,
Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-06 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-05 22:45 [PATCH 1/2] documentation: update sources mirror URL Jon Mason
2021-10-05 22:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] bitbake: bitbake-user-manual: " Jon Mason
2021-10-06 14:41 ` Michael Opdenacker [this message]
2021-10-06 19:53   ` [docs] [PATCH 1/2] documentation: " Jon Mason
2021-10-06 22:17     ` [bitbake-devel] " Richard Purdie
2021-10-07  0:48       ` Jon Mason
2021-10-07  8:14         ` Quentin Schulz
2021-10-07  8:42       ` Michael Opdenacker
     [not found]       ` <16ABB308824CB520.3789@lists.yoctoproject.org>
2021-10-07  9:04         ` Michael Opdenacker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35bcdc42-9ed6-5232-c94e-c69f3fd7af94@bootlin.com \
    --to=michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=docs@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).