* Build error of perf
@ 2020-09-07 5:37 leimaohui
2020-09-07 8:19 ` [meta-freescale] " Andrey Zhizhikin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: leimaohui @ 2020-09-07 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale
Hi,
By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
---------------------------------------------
aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `runtime'; /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here
aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/ build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `end'; /ubinux-dev/ /build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here
......
---------------------------------------------
It seems that the repository has to merge the following patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/4/313
Best regards
Lei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
2020-09-07 5:37 Build error of perf leimaohui
@ 2020-09-07 8:19 ` Andrey Zhizhikin
2020-09-08 2:08 ` leimaohui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Zhizhikin @ 2020-09-07 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: leimaohui; +Cc: meta-freescale
Hello Lei,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:37 AM leimaohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `runtime'; /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here
> aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/ build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `end'; /ubinux-dev/ /build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here
> ......
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> It seems that the repository has to merge the following patch:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/4/313
This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the
latest version of kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx)
contains version v5.4.62. Or it is possible that you're building
linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to port the patch on
top of your tree.
>
> Best regards
> Lei
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Andrey.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
2020-09-07 8:19 ` [meta-freescale] " Andrey Zhizhikin
@ 2020-09-08 2:08 ` leimaohui
2020-09-08 2:16 ` Zhenhua Luo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: leimaohui @ 2020-09-08 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Zhizhikin; +Cc: meta-freescale
Hi, Andrey
> I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the latest version of
> kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx) contains version v5.4.62. Or it is
> possible that you're building linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to
> port the patch on top of your tree.
I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-freescale.
Best regards
Lei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrey Zhizhikin <andrey.z@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 4:20 PM
> To: Lei, Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
>
> Hello Lei,
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:37 AM leimaohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
> > /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubi
> > nux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1
> > .0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of
> > `runtime';
> > /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubi
> > nux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/
> > 1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here
> > aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/
> > build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-
> linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r9/perf-
> 1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `end'; /ubinux-dev/
> /build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-
> linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-
> r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here ......
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > It seems that the repository has to merge the following patch:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/4/313
>
> This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
> present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
>
> I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the latest version of
> kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx) contains version v5.4.62. Or it is
> possible that you're building linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to
> port the patch on top of your tree.
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > Lei
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Andrey.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
2020-09-08 2:08 ` leimaohui
@ 2020-09-08 2:16 ` Zhenhua Luo
2020-09-08 3:10 ` leimaohui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhenhua Luo @ 2020-09-08 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: leimaohui, Andrey Zhizhikin; +Cc: meta-freescale
Hi Lei,
May I know which branch you are using?
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
> -----Original Message-----
> From: meta-freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org <meta-
> freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of leimaohui via
> lists.yoctoproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:09 AM
> To: Andrey Zhizhikin <andrey.z@gmail.com>
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
>
> Hi, Andrey
>
> > I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the
> > latest version of kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx)
> > contains version v5.4.62. Or it is possible that you're building
> > linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to port the patch on top of
> your tree.
>
> I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-
> freescale.
>
> Best regards
> Lei
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrey Zhizhikin <andrey.z@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 4:20 PM
> > To: Lei, Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
> >
> > Hello Lei,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:37 AM leimaohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
> > > /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-u
> > > bi
> > > nux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf
> > > /1
> > > .0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition
> > > of `runtime';
> > > /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-u
> > > bi
> > > nux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/per
> > > f/
> > > 1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here
> > > aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/
> > > build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-
> > linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-r
> > 9/perf-
> > 1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `end';
> > /ubinux-dev/
> > /build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-
> > linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0-
> > r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here ......
> > > ---------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > It seems that the repository has to merge the following patch:
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flk
> > >
> ml.org%2Flkml%2F2020%2F3%2F4%2F313&data=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.lu
> o%40
> > >
> nxp.com%7C63f43673235e4dd22bc008d8539c24f4%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92c
> d99
> > >
> c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637351277383842133&sdata=Qm7fCOHUJ7JO3
> eb2z%2
> > > BxQ97ke6sGZJRFhjIJfyuMVtSo%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756] which is
> > present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
> >
> > I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the
> > latest version of kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx)
> > contains version v5.4.62. Or it is possible that you're building
> > linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to port the patch on top of
> your tree.
> >
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Lei
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Andrey.
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
2020-09-08 2:16 ` Zhenhua Luo
@ 2020-09-08 3:10 ` leimaohui
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: leimaohui @ 2020-09-08 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhenhua Luo, Andrey Zhizhikin; +Cc: meta-freescale
Hi, Yang
The following is the status of linux-qoriq that I'm using:
-------------------------------------
tmp/work-shared/ubinux-armv8/kernel-source$ git branch
* (HEAD detached at 134788b16485)
Master
-------------------------------------
Best regards
Lei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhenhua Luo <zhenhua.luo@nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:16 AM
> To: Lei, Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>; Andrey Zhizhikin
> <andrey.z@gmail.com>
> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: RE: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
>
> Hi Lei,
>
> May I know which branch you are using?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Zhenhua
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: meta-freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org <meta-
> > freescale@lists.yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of leimaohui via
> > lists.yoctoproject.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 10:09 AM
> > To: Andrey Zhizhikin <andrey.z@gmail.com>
> > Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
> >
> > Hi, Andrey
> >
> > > I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the
> > > latest version of kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx)
> > > contains version v5.4.62. Or it is possible that you're building
> > > linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to port the patch on
> > > top of
> > your tree.
> >
> > I'm using linux-qoriq and I have updated to the newest commit of meta-
> > freescale.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Lei
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrey Zhizhikin <andrey.z@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 4:20 PM
> > > To: Lei, Maohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> > > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Build error of perf
> > >
> > > Hello Lei,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 7:37 AM leimaohui <leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > By latest meta-freescale, perf build failed, the error is as following:
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > > aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld:
> > > > /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8
> > > > -u
> > > > bi
> > > > nux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/pe
> > > > rf
> > > > /1
> > > > .0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple
> > > > definition of `runtime';
> > > > /ubinux-dev/build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8
> > > > -u
> > > > bi
> > > > nux-linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/p
> > > > er
> > > > f/
> > > > 1.0-r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined
> > > > here
> > > > aarch64-ubinux-linux-ld: /ubinux-dev/
> > > > build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-
> > > linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-ctl.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.0
> > > -r
> > > 9/perf-
> > > 1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c:38: multiple definition of `end';
> > > /ubinux-dev/
> > > /build-ubinux-armv8-multlib-daily/tmp/work/ubinux_armv8-ubinux-
> > > linux/perf/1.0-r9/perf-1.0/bench/epoll-wait.o:/usr/src/debug/perf/1.
> > > 0-
> > > r9/perf-1.0/tools/perf/bench/epoll-wait.c:93: first defined here ......
> > > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > It seems that the repository has to merge the following patch:
> > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > > lk
> > > >
> >
> ml.org%2Flkml%2F2020%2F3%2F4%2F313&data=02%7C01%7Czhenhua.
> lu
> > o%40
> > > >
> >
> nxp.com%7C63f43673235e4dd22bc008d8539c24f4%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa9
> 2c
> > d99
> > > >
> >
> c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637351277383842133&sdata=Qm7fCOHUJ7J
> O3
> > eb2z%2
> > > > BxQ97ke6sGZJRFhjIJfyuMVtSo%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > This is covered by [df35e878d0a51755fb500e2e8e29c7ebb0239756]
> which
> > > is present in the kernel tree and came in with v5.4.56.
> > >
> > > I guess you're not building the latest meta-freescale, since the
> > > latest version of kernel recipes (linux-fslc and linux-fslc-imx)
> > > contains version v5.4.62. Or it is possible that you're building
> > > linux-imx kernel, in which case you would have to port the patch on
> > > top of
> > your tree.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Lei
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Andrey.
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-08 3:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-07 5:37 Build error of perf leimaohui
2020-09-07 8:19 ` [meta-freescale] " Andrey Zhizhikin
2020-09-08 2:08 ` leimaohui
2020-09-08 2:16 ` Zhenhua Luo
2020-09-08 3:10 ` leimaohui
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).