All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, tiwai@suse.de, bp@suse.de,
	brijesh.singh@amd.com, dyoung@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:14:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <153782729511.130337.17128646882631701192.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153782698067.130337.12079523922130875402.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

find_next_iomem_res() finds an iomem resource that covers part of a range
described by "start, end".  All callers expect that range to be inclusive,
i.e., both start and end are included, but find_next_iomem_res() doesn't
handle the end address correctly.

If it finds an iomem resource that contains exactly the end address, it
skips it, e.g., if "start, end" is [0x0-0x10000] and there happens to be an
iomem resource [mem 0x10000-0x10000] (the single byte at 0x10000), we skip
it:

  find_next_iomem_res(...)
  {
    start = 0x0;
    end = 0x10000;
    for (p = next_resource(...)) {
      # p->start = 0x10000;
      # p->end = 0x10000;
      # we *should* return this resource, but this condition is false:
      if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end))
        break;

Adjust find_next_iomem_res() so it allows a resource that includes the
single byte at the end of the range.  This is a corner case that we
probably don't see in practice.

Fixes: 58c1b5b07907 ("[PATCH] memory hotadd fixes: find_next_system_ram catch range fix")
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 kernel/resource.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 30e1bc68503b..155ec873ea4d 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
 
 /*
- * Finds the lowest iomem resource existing within [res->start.res->end).
+ * Finds the lowest iomem resource existing within [res->start..res->end].
  * The caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags, and optionally
  * desc.  If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1.
  * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children until
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
 			p = NULL;
 			break;
 		}
-		if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end))
+		if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start <= end))
 			break;
 	}
 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, bhe@redhat.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, tiwai@suse.de, x86@kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:14:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <153782729511.130337.17128646882631701192.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153782698067.130337.12079523922130875402.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

find_next_iomem_res() finds an iomem resource that covers part of a range
described by "start, end".  All callers expect that range to be inclusive,
i.e., both start and end are included, but find_next_iomem_res() doesn't
handle the end address correctly.

If it finds an iomem resource that contains exactly the end address, it
skips it, e.g., if "start, end" is [0x0-0x10000] and there happens to be an
iomem resource [mem 0x10000-0x10000] (the single byte at 0x10000), we skip
it:

  find_next_iomem_res(...)
  {
    start = 0x0;
    end = 0x10000;
    for (p = next_resource(...)) {
      # p->start = 0x10000;
      # p->end = 0x10000;
      # we *should* return this resource, but this condition is false:
      if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end))
        break;

Adjust find_next_iomem_res() so it allows a resource that includes the
single byte at the end of the range.  This is a corner case that we
probably don't see in practice.

Fixes: 58c1b5b07907 ("[PATCH] memory hotadd fixes: find_next_system_ram catch range fix")
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 kernel/resource.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index 30e1bc68503b..155ec873ea4d 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
 
 /*
- * Finds the lowest iomem resource existing within [res->start.res->end).
+ * Finds the lowest iomem resource existing within [res->start..res->end].
  * The caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags, and optionally
  * desc.  If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1.
  * This function walks the whole tree and not just first level children until
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(struct resource *res, unsigned long desc,
 			p = NULL;
 			break;
 		}
-		if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start < end))
+		if ((p->end >= start) && (p->start <= end))
 			break;
 	}
 


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-24 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21  7:32 [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump kernel e820 table Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem resources Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-24 17:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 17:52     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  7:08     ` lijiang
2018-09-25  7:08       ` lijiang
2018-09-24 22:14   ` [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2018-09-24 22:14       ` [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:15     ` [PATCH 3/3] resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-24 22:15       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  8:58       ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25  8:58         ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25 11:20         ` Baoquan He
2018-09-25 11:20           ` Baoquan He
2018-09-27  5:27       ` lijiang
2018-09-27  5:27         ` lijiang
2018-09-27 14:03         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-27 14:03           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28  5:09           ` lijiang
2018-09-28  5:09             ` lijiang
2018-09-28 13:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-28 13:10             ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-26  9:22     ` [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes lijiang
2018-09-26  9:22       ` lijiang
2018-09-26 13:36       ` lijiang
2018-09-26 13:36         ` lijiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] x86/kexec_file: add e820 entry in case e820 type string matches to io resource name Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] x86/kexec_file: add reserved e820 ranges to kdump kernel e820 table Lianbo Jiang
2018-09-21  7:32   ` Lianbo Jiang
2018-10-16  2:56 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] add reserved e820 ranges to the " Dave Young
2018-10-16  2:56   ` Dave Young
2018-10-16  3:45   ` lijiang
2018-10-16  3:45     ` lijiang
2018-09-27 14:21 [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-27 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-27 14:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-28 13:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-28 13:54     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=153782729511.130337.17128646882631701192.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.