From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
"<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"qemu-ppc@nongnu.org List" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 12/17] PowerPC: booke64: Add DO_KVM kernel hooks
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:25:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341440735.16808.42.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1B2CBB56-7180-4A73-8E51-6538A725F710@suse.de>
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 16:29 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> > +#define KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(reg, spr) \
> > + BEGIN_FTR_SECTION \
> > + mfspr reg, spr; \
> > + END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_EMB_HV)
> > +#else
> > +#define KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(reg, spr)
> > +#endif
>
> Bleks - this is ugly. Do we really need to open-code the #ifdef here?
> Can't the feature section code determine that the feature is disabled
> and just always not include the code?
You can't but in any case I don't see the point of the conditional here,
we'll eventually have to load srr1 no ? We can move the load up to here
in all cases or can't we ? If really not, we could have it inside DO_KVM
and be done with it no ?
> > +
> > /* Exception prolog code for all exceptions */
> > -#define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, type, srr0, srr1, addition) \
> > +#define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, type, srr0, srr1, addition) \
> > mtspr SPRN_SPRG_##type##_SCRATCH,r13; /* get spare registers */ \
> > mfspr r13,SPRN_SPRG_PACA; /* get PACA */ \
> > std r10,PACA_EX##type+EX_R10(r13); \
> > std r11,PACA_EX##type+EX_R11(r13); \
> > mfcr r10; /* save CR */ \
> > + KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(r11,srr1); \
> > + DO_KVM intnum,srr1; \
>
> So if DO_KVM already knows srr1, why explicitly do something with it
> the line above, and not in DO_KVM itself?
Yeah that or just move things around in the prolog.
> > addition; /* additional code for that exc. */ \
> > std r1,PACA_EX##type+EX_R1(r13); /* save old r1 in the PACA */ \
> > stw r10,PACA_EX##type+EX_CR(r13); /* save old CR in the PACA */ \
> > @@ -69,17 +82,21 @@
> > ld r1,PACA_MC_STACK(r13); \
> > subi r1,r1,SPECIAL_EXC_FRAME_SIZE;
> >
> > -#define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, addition) \
> > - EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, GEN, SPRN_SRR0, SPRN_SRR1, addition##_GEN(n))
> > +#define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, addition) \
> > + EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, GEN, SPRN_SRR0, SPRN_SRR1, \
>
> We would we want to pass in 2 numbers? Let's please confine this onto
> a single ID per interrupt vector. Either we use the hardcoded ones
> available here in the KVM code or we use the KVM ones instead of the
> hardcoded ones here. But not both please. Just because it's like that
> on 32bit doesn't count as an excuse :).
Right. Also I already objected to the explicit passing of the srr's
anyway.
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org List" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 12/17] PowerPC: booke64: Add DO_KVM kernel hooks
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:25:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341440735.16808.42.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1B2CBB56-7180-4A73-8E51-6538A725F710@suse.de>
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 16:29 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> > +#define KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(reg, spr) \
> > + BEGIN_FTR_SECTION \
> > + mfspr reg, spr; \
> > + END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_EMB_HV)
> > +#else
> > +#define KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(reg, spr)
> > +#endif
>
> Bleks - this is ugly. Do we really need to open-code the #ifdef here?
> Can't the feature section code determine that the feature is disabled
> and just always not include the code?
You can't but in any case I don't see the point of the conditional here,
we'll eventually have to load srr1 no ? We can move the load up to here
in all cases or can't we ? If really not, we could have it inside DO_KVM
and be done with it no ?
> > +
> > /* Exception prolog code for all exceptions */
> > -#define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, type, srr0, srr1, addition) \
> > +#define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, type, srr0, srr1, addition) \
> > mtspr SPRN_SPRG_##type##_SCRATCH,r13; /* get spare registers */ \
> > mfspr r13,SPRN_SPRG_PACA; /* get PACA */ \
> > std r10,PACA_EX##type+EX_R10(r13); \
> > std r11,PACA_EX##type+EX_R11(r13); \
> > mfcr r10; /* save CR */ \
> > + KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(r11,srr1); \
> > + DO_KVM intnum,srr1; \
>
> So if DO_KVM already knows srr1, why explicitly do something with it
> the line above, and not in DO_KVM itself?
Yeah that or just move things around in the prolog.
> > addition; /* additional code for that exc. */ \
> > std r1,PACA_EX##type+EX_R1(r13); /* save old r1 in the PACA */ \
> > stw r10,PACA_EX##type+EX_CR(r13); /* save old CR in the PACA */ \
> > @@ -69,17 +82,21 @@
> > ld r1,PACA_MC_STACK(r13); \
> > subi r1,r1,SPECIAL_EXC_FRAME_SIZE;
> >
> > -#define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, addition) \
> > - EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, GEN, SPRN_SRR0, SPRN_SRR1, addition##_GEN(n))
> > +#define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, addition) \
> > + EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, GEN, SPRN_SRR0, SPRN_SRR1, \
>
> We would we want to pass in 2 numbers? Let's please confine this onto
> a single ID per interrupt vector. Either we use the hardcoded ones
> available here in the KVM code or we use the KVM ones instead of the
> hardcoded ones here. But not both please. Just because it's like that
> on 32bit doesn't count as an excuse :).
Right. Also I already objected to the explicit passing of the srr's
anyway.
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
"<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>" <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"qemu-ppc@nongnu.org List" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 12/17] PowerPC: booke64: Add DO_KVM kernel hooks
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:25:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341440735.16808.42.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1B2CBB56-7180-4A73-8E51-6538A725F710@suse.de>
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 16:29 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV
> > +#define KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(reg, spr) \
> > + BEGIN_FTR_SECTION \
> > + mfspr reg, spr; \
> > + END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_EMB_HV)
> > +#else
> > +#define KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(reg, spr)
> > +#endif
>
> Bleks - this is ugly. Do we really need to open-code the #ifdef here?
> Can't the feature section code determine that the feature is disabled
> and just always not include the code?
You can't but in any case I don't see the point of the conditional here,
we'll eventually have to load srr1 no ? We can move the load up to here
in all cases or can't we ? If really not, we could have it inside DO_KVM
and be done with it no ?
> > +
> > /* Exception prolog code for all exceptions */
> > -#define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, type, srr0, srr1, addition) \
> > +#define EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, type, srr0, srr1, addition) \
> > mtspr SPRN_SPRG_##type##_SCRATCH,r13; /* get spare registers */ \
> > mfspr r13,SPRN_SPRG_PACA; /* get PACA */ \
> > std r10,PACA_EX##type+EX_R10(r13); \
> > std r11,PACA_EX##type+EX_R11(r13); \
> > mfcr r10; /* save CR */ \
> > + KVM_BOOKE_HV_MFSPR(r11,srr1); \
> > + DO_KVM intnum,srr1; \
>
> So if DO_KVM already knows srr1, why explicitly do something with it
> the line above, and not in DO_KVM itself?
Yeah that or just move things around in the prolog.
> > addition; /* additional code for that exc. */ \
> > std r1,PACA_EX##type+EX_R1(r13); /* save old r1 in the PACA */ \
> > stw r10,PACA_EX##type+EX_CR(r13); /* save old CR in the PACA */ \
> > @@ -69,17 +82,21 @@
> > ld r1,PACA_MC_STACK(r13); \
> > subi r1,r1,SPECIAL_EXC_FRAME_SIZE;
> >
> > -#define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, addition) \
> > - EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, GEN, SPRN_SRR0, SPRN_SRR1, addition##_GEN(n))
> > +#define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, addition) \
> > + EXCEPTION_PROLOG(n, intnum, GEN, SPRN_SRR0, SPRN_SRR1, \
>
> We would we want to pass in 2 numbers? Let's please confine this onto
> a single ID per interrupt vector. Either we use the hardcoded ones
> available here in the KVM code or we use the KVM ones instead of the
> hardcoded ones here. But not both please. Just because it's like that
> on 32bit doesn't count as an excuse :).
Right. Also I already objected to the explicit passing of the srr's
anyway.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 203+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 12:26 [RFC PATCH 00/17] KVM: PPC: 64-bit Book3E support Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Set interrupt computation mode for 64-bit host Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in mtspr/mfspr emulation Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 13:21 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:21 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:21 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 14:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 14:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 14:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 13:24 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-25 13:24 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-25 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-25 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-26 22:34 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-26 22:34 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-26 22:34 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-27 11:41 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-27 11:41 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-27 11:41 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-27 15:23 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-27 15:23 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-04 13:33 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:33 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:33 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 11:49 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 11:49 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 11:49 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 12:12 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 12:12 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 12:12 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 12:54 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 12:54 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 12:54 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-11 18:07 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 18:07 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 18:07 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 04/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add guest computation mode for irq delivery Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 13:40 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:40 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:40 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 9:28 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 9:28 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 9:28 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 23:51 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-05 23:51 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-05 23:51 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-06 7:03 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-06 7:03 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-06 7:03 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] KVM: PPC: booke: Extend MAS2 EPN mask for 64-bit Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 13:49 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:49 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:49 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 11:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 11:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 11:14 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-10-08 10:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-10-08 10:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-10-08 10:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-10-08 13:06 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-10-08 13:06 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-10-08 13:06 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-10-08 13:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-10-08 13:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-10-08 13:10 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] KVM: PPC: e500: Add emulation helper for getting instruction ea Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 13:56 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:56 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 13:56 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-05 11:39 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 11:39 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 11:39 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-11 17:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 17:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 17:53 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] KVM: PPC: e500: Mask ea's high 32-bits in 32/64 instr emulation Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 14:00 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:00 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:00 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:05 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:05 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:05 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Fix tlbilx emulation for 64-bit guests Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-06 14:54 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-06 14:54 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-06 14:54 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Hard disable interrupts when entering guest Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 14:14 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:14 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:14 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 22:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-04 22:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-06 23:03 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-06 23:03 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-06 23:03 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/17] PowerPC: booke64: Refactor exception prolog for save/restore regs Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-26 22:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-26 22:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-26 22:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-27 11:49 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-27 11:49 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-27 11:49 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/17] PowerPC: booke64: Fix machine check handler to use the right prolog Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-26 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-26 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-26 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] PowerPC: booke64: Add DO_KVM kernel hooks Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 14:29 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:29 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 14:29 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:27 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 15:27 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 15:27 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 15:45 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:45 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:45 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 18:15 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 18:15 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 18:15 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-06 0:19 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-06 0:19 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-06 0:19 ` Scott Wood
2012-07-04 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2012-07-04 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-04 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-06 22:33 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-06 22:33 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-06 22:33 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-06 23:11 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-06 23:11 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-06 23:11 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-07 8:39 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-07 8:39 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-07 8:39 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-11 22:25 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:25 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:25 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-11 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-11 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-11 22:35 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:35 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-11 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-11 22:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-11 22:51 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:51 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-11 22:51 ` Alexander Graf
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/17] PowerPC: booke64: Use SPRG0/3 scratch for bolted TLB miss & crit int Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-26 22:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-26 22:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-26 22:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-05 15:51 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 15:51 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-05 15:51 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-26 22:24 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-26 22:24 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-26 22:24 ` Scott Wood
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/17] KVM: PPC32: bookehv: Remove GET_VCPU macro from exception handler Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] KVM: PPC64: bookehv: Add support for interrupt handling Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-07-04 15:13 ` [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:13 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:13 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:37 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 15:37 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 15:37 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 15:46 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:46 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 15:46 ` Alexander Graf
2012-07-04 18:21 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 18:21 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-07-04 18:21 ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] KVM: PPC: e500: Silence bogus GCC warning in tlb code Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 17/17] KVM: PPC: booke: Fix get_tb() compile error on 64-bit Mihai Caraman
2012-06-25 12:26 ` Mihai Caraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1341440735.16808.42.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.