From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com>, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - remove locking in async callback Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:34:44 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1516308.8nf3SO2l11@tauon.chronox.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171103132016.GB8330@gondor.apana.org.au> Am Freitag, 3. November 2017, 14:20:16 CET schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2017, 17:26:31 CET schrieb Romain Izard: > > > > Hi Romain, > > > > the patch below should cover the issue you see. Would you mind testing it? > > > > Thanks > > Stephan > > > > ---8<--- > > > > The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the > > socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not > > even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock > > can be safely ignored. > > Are you sure about that? In particular is the callback function still > sane without the socket lock if a concurrent recvmsg/sendmsg call is > made? resultlen receives its data from the async_request -> no socket af_alg_free_areq_sgls(areq) does not require a socket, but it uses the socket to find the data structures -> I do not see that the socket is operated on though. The socket will always be alive as the sk_refcnt is not yet decremented by __sock_put. sock_kfree_s uses an atomic operation __sock_put uses an atomic operation iocb->ki_complete does not use the socket Where would you think that the lock is needed? > > Your fixes header is wrong too as the locks weren't introduced in that > commit, they just got moved around. Neither the skcipher_async_cb nor aead_async_cb up to and including 4.13 contain any lock. Ciao Stephan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: smueller@chronox.de (Stephan Mueller) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - remove locking in async callback Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:34:44 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1516308.8nf3SO2l11@tauon.chronox.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171103132016.GB8330@gondor.apana.org.au> Am Freitag, 3. November 2017, 14:20:16 CET schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Stephan M?ller wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2017, 17:26:31 CET schrieb Romain Izard: > > > > Hi Romain, > > > > the patch below should cover the issue you see. Would you mind testing it? > > > > Thanks > > Stephan > > > > ---8<--- > > > > The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the > > socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not > > even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock > > can be safely ignored. > > Are you sure about that? In particular is the callback function still > sane without the socket lock if a concurrent recvmsg/sendmsg call is > made? resultlen receives its data from the async_request -> no socket af_alg_free_areq_sgls(areq) does not require a socket, but it uses the socket to find the data structures -> I do not see that the socket is operated on though. The socket will always be alive as the sk_refcnt is not yet decremented by __sock_put. sock_kfree_s uses an atomic operation __sock_put uses an atomic operation iocb->ki_complete does not use the socket Where would you think that the lock is needed? > > Your fixes header is wrong too as the locks weren't introduced in that > commit, they just got moved around. Neither the skcipher_async_cb nor aead_async_cb up to and including 4.13 contain any lock. Ciao Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 13:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-10-25 15:26 "BUG: scheduling while atomic" in atmel-aes on Linux v4.14-rc6 Romain Izard 2017-10-25 15:26 ` Romain Izard 2017-10-25 15:59 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-10-25 15:59 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-10-29 20:39 ` [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - remove locking in async callback Stephan Müller 2017-10-29 20:39 ` Stephan Müller 2017-10-30 17:15 ` Romain Izard 2017-10-30 17:15 ` Romain Izard 2017-11-03 13:20 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-03 13:20 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-03 13:34 ` Stephan Mueller [this message] 2017-11-03 13:34 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-11-06 16:06 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-11-06 16:06 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-11-07 5:22 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-07 5:22 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-07 6:19 ` Stephan Müller 2017-11-07 6:19 ` Stephan Müller 2017-11-07 6:32 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-07 6:32 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-07 9:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Stephan Müller 2017-11-07 9:05 ` Stephan Müller 2017-11-10 11:10 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-10 11:10 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-10 12:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Stephan Müller 2017-11-10 12:20 ` Stephan Müller 2017-11-10 16:50 ` Romain Izard 2017-11-10 16:50 ` Romain Izard 2017-11-24 7:37 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-24 7:37 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-24 16:04 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-11-24 16:04 ` Stephan Mueller 2017-11-24 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2017-11-24 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron 2017-11-25 0:17 ` Herbert Xu 2017-11-25 0:17 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1516308.8nf3SO2l11@tauon.chronox.de \ --to=smueller@chronox.de \ --cc=cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com \ --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \ --cc=romain.izard.pro@gmail.com \ --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.