All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@gmail.com>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - remove locking in async callback
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:34:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516308.8nf3SO2l11@tauon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103132016.GB8330@gondor.apana.org.au>

Am Freitag, 3. November 2017, 14:20:16 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,

> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2017, 17:26:31 CET schrieb Romain Izard:
> > 
> > Hi Romain,
> > 
> > the patch below should cover the issue you see. Would you mind testing it?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Stephan
> > 
> > ---8<---
> > 
> > The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
> > socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not
> > even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock
> > can be safely ignored.
> 
> Are you sure about that? In particular is the callback function still
> sane without the socket lock if a concurrent recvmsg/sendmsg call is
> made?

resultlen receives its data from the async_request -> no socket

af_alg_free_areq_sgls(areq) does not require a socket, but it uses the socket 
to find the data structures -> I do not see that the socket is operated on 
though. The socket will always be alive as the sk_refcnt is not yet 
decremented by __sock_put.

sock_kfree_s uses an atomic operation

__sock_put uses an atomic operation

iocb->ki_complete does not use the socket

Where would you think that the lock is needed?
> 
> Your fixes header is wrong too as the locks weren't introduced in that
> commit, they just got moved around.

Neither the skcipher_async_cb nor aead_async_cb up to and including 4.13 
contain any lock.

Ciao
Stephan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: smueller@chronox.de (Stephan Mueller)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - remove locking in async callback
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 14:34:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516308.8nf3SO2l11@tauon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103132016.GB8330@gondor.apana.org.au>

Am Freitag, 3. November 2017, 14:20:16 CET schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,

> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Stephan M?ller wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2017, 17:26:31 CET schrieb Romain Izard:
> > 
> > Hi Romain,
> > 
> > the patch below should cover the issue you see. Would you mind testing it?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Stephan
> > 
> > ---8<---
> > 
> > The code paths protected by the socket-lock do not use or modify the
> > socket in a non-atomic fashion. The actions pertaining the socket do not
> > even need to be handled as an atomic operation. Thus, the socket-lock
> > can be safely ignored.
> 
> Are you sure about that? In particular is the callback function still
> sane without the socket lock if a concurrent recvmsg/sendmsg call is
> made?

resultlen receives its data from the async_request -> no socket

af_alg_free_areq_sgls(areq) does not require a socket, but it uses the socket 
to find the data structures -> I do not see that the socket is operated on 
though. The socket will always be alive as the sk_refcnt is not yet 
decremented by __sock_put.

sock_kfree_s uses an atomic operation

__sock_put uses an atomic operation

iocb->ki_complete does not use the socket

Where would you think that the lock is needed?
> 
> Your fixes header is wrong too as the locks weren't introduced in that
> commit, they just got moved around.

Neither the skcipher_async_cb nor aead_async_cb up to and including 4.13 
contain any lock.

Ciao
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-03 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-25 15:26 "BUG: scheduling while atomic" in atmel-aes on Linux v4.14-rc6 Romain Izard
2017-10-25 15:26 ` Romain Izard
2017-10-25 15:59 ` Stephan Mueller
2017-10-25 15:59   ` Stephan Mueller
2017-10-29 20:39 ` [PATCH] crypto: AF_ALG - remove locking in async callback Stephan Müller
2017-10-29 20:39   ` Stephan Müller
2017-10-30 17:15   ` Romain Izard
2017-10-30 17:15     ` Romain Izard
2017-11-03 13:20   ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-03 13:20     ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-03 13:34     ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2017-11-03 13:34       ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-06 16:06     ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-06 16:06       ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-07  5:22       ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-07  5:22         ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-07  6:19         ` Stephan Müller
2017-11-07  6:19           ` Stephan Müller
2017-11-07  6:32           ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-07  6:32             ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-07  9:05             ` [PATCH v2] " Stephan Müller
2017-11-07  9:05               ` Stephan Müller
2017-11-10 11:10               ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-10 11:10                 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-10 12:20                 ` [PATCH v3] " Stephan Müller
2017-11-10 12:20                   ` Stephan Müller
2017-11-10 16:50                   ` Romain Izard
2017-11-10 16:50                     ` Romain Izard
2017-11-24  7:37                   ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-24  7:37                     ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-24 16:04                     ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-24 16:04                       ` Stephan Mueller
2017-11-24 17:37                       ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-24 17:37                         ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-11-25  0:17                       ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-25  0:17                         ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1516308.8nf3SO2l11@tauon.chronox.de \
    --to=smueller@chronox.de \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@microchip.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=romain.izard.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.