All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andrew Honig <ahonig@google.com>,
	alan@linux.intel.com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/10] prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:01:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151632009605.21271.11304291057104672116.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Changes since v3 [1]
* Drop 'ifence_array_ptr' and associated compile-time + run-time
  switching and just use the masking approach all the time.

* Convert 'get_user' to use pointer sanitization via masking rather than
  lfence. '__get_user' and associated paths still rely on
  lfence. (Linus)

      "Basically, the rule is trivial: find all 'stac' users, and use
       address masking if those users already integrate the limit
       check, and lfence they don't."

* At syscall entry sanitize the syscall number under speculation
  to remove a user controlled pointer de-reference in kernel
  space.  (Linus)

* Fix a raw lfence in the kvm code (added for v4.15-rc8) to use
  'array_ptr'.

* Propose 'array_idx' as a way to sanitize user input that is
  later used as an array index, but where the validation is
  happening in a different code block than the array reference.
  (Christian).

* Fix grammar in speculation.txt (Kees)

---

Quoting Mark's original RFC:

"Recently, Google Project Zero discovered several classes of attack
against speculative execution. One of these, known as variant-1, allows
explicit bounds checks to be bypassed under speculation, providing an
arbitrary read gadget. Further details can be found on the GPZ blog [2]
and the Documentation patch in this series."

A precondition of using this attack on the kernel is to get a user
controlled pointer de-referenced (under speculation) in privileged code.
The primary source of user controlled pointers in the kernel is the
arguments passed to 'get_user' and '__get_user'. An example of other
user controlled pointers are user-controlled array / pointer offsets.

Better tooling is needed to find more arrays / pointers with user
controlled indices / offsets that can be converted to use 'array_ptr' or
'array_idx'. A few are included in this set, and these are not expected
to be complete. That said, the 'get_user' protections raise the bar on
finding a vulnerable gadget in the kernel.

These patches are also available via the 'nospec-v4' git branch here:

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/linux nospec-v4

Note that the BPF fix for Spectre variant1 is merged for 4.15-rc8.

[2]: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html

---

Dan Williams (9):
      asm/nospec, array_ptr: sanitize speculative array de-references
      x86: implement array_ptr_mask()
      x86: introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec and ifence
      x86, __get_user: use __uaccess_begin_nospec
      x86, get_user: use pointer masking to limit speculation
      x86: narrow out of bounds syscalls to sys_read under speculation
      vfs, fdtable: prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution
      kvm, x86: fix spectre-v1 mitigation
      nl80211: sanitize array index in parse_txq_params

Mark Rutland (1):
      Documentation: document array_ptr


 Documentation/speculation.txt     |  143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S         |    2 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h    |   28 +++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h        |    3 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h       |   24 ++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h    |   15 +++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h |    6 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h |   12 ++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c                |   19 ++---
 arch/x86/lib/getuser.S            |    5 +
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c        |    8 +-
 include/linux/fdtable.h           |    7 +-
 include/linux/nospec.h            |   65 +++++++++++++++++
 net/wireless/nl80211.c            |   10 ++-
 14 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/speculation.txt
 create mode 100644 include/linux/nospec.h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andrew Honig <ahonig@google.com>,
	alan@linux.intel.com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Christian Lamparter <chunk>
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/10] prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:01:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151632009605.21271.11304291057104672116.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Changes since v3 [1]
* Drop 'ifence_array_ptr' and associated compile-time + run-time
  switching and just use the masking approach all the time.

* Convert 'get_user' to use pointer sanitization via masking rather than
  lfence. '__get_user' and associated paths still rely on
  lfence. (Linus)

      "Basically, the rule is trivial: find all 'stac' users, and use
       address masking if those users already integrate the limit
       check, and lfence they don't."

* At syscall entry sanitize the syscall number under speculation
  to remove a user controlled pointer de-reference in kernel
  space.  (Linus)

* Fix a raw lfence in the kvm code (added for v4.15-rc8) to use
  'array_ptr'.

* Propose 'array_idx' as a way to sanitize user input that is
  later used as an array index, but where the validation is
  happening in a different code block than the array reference.
  (Christian).

* Fix grammar in speculation.txt (Kees)

---

Quoting Mark's original RFC:

"Recently, Google Project Zero discovered several classes of attack
against speculative execution. One of these, known as variant-1, allows
explicit bounds checks to be bypassed under speculation, providing an
arbitrary read gadget. Further details can be found on the GPZ blog [2]
and the Documentation patch in this series."

A precondition of using this attack on the kernel is to get a user
controlled pointer de-referenced (under speculation) in privileged code.
The primary source of user controlled pointers in the kernel is the
arguments passed to 'get_user' and '__get_user'. An example of other
user controlled pointers are user-controlled array / pointer offsets.

Better tooling is needed to find more arrays / pointers with user
controlled indices / offsets that can be converted to use 'array_ptr' or
'array_idx'. A few are included in this set, and these are not expected
to be complete. That said, the 'get_user' protections raise the bar on
finding a vulnerable gadget in the kernel.

These patches are also available via the 'nospec-v4' git branch here:

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/linux nospec-v4

Note that the BPF fix for Spectre variant1 is merged for 4.15-rc8.

[2]: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html

---

Dan Williams (9):
      asm/nospec, array_ptr: sanitize speculative array de-references
      x86: implement array_ptr_mask()
      x86: introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec and ifence
      x86, __get_user: use __uaccess_begin_nospec
      x86, get_user: use pointer masking to limit speculation
      x86: narrow out of bounds syscalls to sys_read under speculation
      vfs, fdtable: prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution
      kvm, x86: fix spectre-v1 mitigation
      nl80211: sanitize array index in parse_txq_params

Mark Rutland (1):
      Documentation: document array_ptr


 Documentation/speculation.txt     |  143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S         |    2 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h    |   28 +++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h        |    3 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h       |   24 ++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h    |   15 +++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h |    6 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h |   12 ++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c                |   19 ++---
 arch/x86/lib/getuser.S            |    5 +
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c        |    8 +-
 include/linux/fdtable.h           |    7 +-
 include/linux/nospec.h            |   65 +++++++++++++++++
 net/wireless/nl80211.c            |   10 ++-
 14 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/speculation.txt
 create mode 100644 include/linux/nospec.h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andrew Honig <ahonig@google.com>,
	alan@linux.intel.com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 00/10] prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:01:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151632009605.21271.11304291057104672116.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Changes since v3 [1]
* Drop 'ifence_array_ptr' and associated compile-time + run-time
  switching and just use the masking approach all the time.

* Convert 'get_user' to use pointer sanitization via masking rather than
  lfence. '__get_user' and associated paths still rely on
  lfence. (Linus)

      "Basically, the rule is trivial: find all 'stac' users, and use
       address masking if those users already integrate the limit
       check, and lfence they don't."

* At syscall entry sanitize the syscall number under speculation
  to remove a user controlled pointer de-reference in kernel
  space.  (Linus)

* Fix a raw lfence in the kvm code (added for v4.15-rc8) to use
  'array_ptr'.

* Propose 'array_idx' as a way to sanitize user input that is
  later used as an array index, but where the validation is
  happening in a different code block than the array reference.
  (Christian).

* Fix grammar in speculation.txt (Kees)

---

Quoting Mark's original RFC:

"Recently, Google Project Zero discovered several classes of attack
against speculative execution. One of these, known as variant-1, allows
explicit bounds checks to be bypassed under speculation, providing an
arbitrary read gadget. Further details can be found on the GPZ blog [2]
and the Documentation patch in this series."

A precondition of using this attack on the kernel is to get a user
controlled pointer de-referenced (under speculation) in privileged code.
The primary source of user controlled pointers in the kernel is the
arguments passed to 'get_user' and '__get_user'. An example of other
user controlled pointers are user-controlled array / pointer offsets.

Better tooling is needed to find more arrays / pointers with user
controlled indices / offsets that can be converted to use 'array_ptr' or
'array_idx'. A few are included in this set, and these are not expected
to be complete. That said, the 'get_user' protections raise the bar on
finding a vulnerable gadget in the kernel.

These patches are also available via the 'nospec-v4' git branch here:

    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/linux nospec-v4

Note that the BPF fix for Spectre variant1 is merged for 4.15-rc8.

[2]: https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html

---

Dan Williams (9):
      asm/nospec, array_ptr: sanitize speculative array de-references
      x86: implement array_ptr_mask()
      x86: introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec and ifence
      x86, __get_user: use __uaccess_begin_nospec
      x86, get_user: use pointer masking to limit speculation
      x86: narrow out of bounds syscalls to sys_read under speculation
      vfs, fdtable: prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution
      kvm, x86: fix spectre-v1 mitigation
      nl80211: sanitize array index in parse_txq_params

Mark Rutland (1):
      Documentation: document array_ptr


 Documentation/speculation.txt     |  143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S         |    2 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h    |   28 +++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h        |    3 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/smap.h       |   24 ++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h    |   15 +++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h |    6 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h |   12 ++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c                |   19 ++---
 arch/x86/lib/getuser.S            |    5 +
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c        |    8 +-
 include/linux/fdtable.h           |    7 +-
 include/linux/nospec.h            |   65 +++++++++++++++++
 net/wireless/nl80211.c            |   10 ++-
 14 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/speculation.txt
 create mode 100644 include/linux/nospec.h

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-19  0:01 Dan Williams [this message]
2018-01-19  0:01 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 00/10] prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01 ` Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] Documentation: document array_ptr Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] asm/nospec, array_ptr: sanitize speculative array de-references Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19 10:20   ` Jann Horn
2018-01-19 17:48     ` Adam Sampson
2018-01-19 17:48       ` Adam Sampson
2018-01-19 17:48       ` Adam Sampson
2018-01-19 17:48       ` Adam Sampson
2018-01-19 18:12       ` Dan Williams
2018-01-19 18:18         ` Will Deacon
2018-01-19 18:18           ` Will Deacon
2018-01-19 18:26           ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19 18:18     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-19 18:18       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-19 20:55       ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-25  7:09   ` Cyril Novikov
2018-01-25  7:09     ` [kernel-hardening] " Cyril Novikov
2018-01-25 22:37     ` Dan Williams
2018-01-25 22:37       ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86: implement array_ptr_mask() Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86: introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec and ifence Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:01   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86, __get_user: use __uaccess_begin_nospec Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] x86, get_user: use pointer masking to limit speculation Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] x86: narrow out of bounds syscalls to sys_read under speculation Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-24 14:40   ` Jiri Slaby
2018-01-24 14:40     ` [kernel-hardening] " Jiri Slaby
2018-02-06 19:29   ` Luis Henriques
2018-02-06 19:48     ` Dan Williams
2018-02-06 20:26       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 20:37         ` Dan Williams
2018-02-06 20:42           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 20:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 20:49             ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-06 20:58               ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 21:37                 ` Dan Williams
2018-02-06 22:52                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-07  0:33                     ` Dan Williams
2018-02-07  1:23                       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-06 22:51       ` Luis Henriques
2018-02-06 22:51         ` Luis Henriques
2018-01-19  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] vfs, fdtable: prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm, x86: fix spectre-v1 mitigation Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  8:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-19  8:42     ` [kernel-hardening] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-19  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] nl80211: sanitize array index in parse_txq_params Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-19  0:02   ` Dan Williams
2018-01-21 10:37   ` Johannes Berg
2018-01-21 10:37     ` [kernel-hardening] " Johannes Berg
2018-01-21 10:37     ` Johannes Berg
2018-01-20  6:58 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] prevent bounds-check bypass via speculative execution Dan Williams
2018-01-20  6:58   ` [kernel-hardening] " Dan Williams
2018-01-20  6:58   ` Dan Williams
2018-01-20 16:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-20 16:56     ` [kernel-hardening] " Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-20 16:56     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-20 17:07     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-20 17:07       ` [kernel-hardening] " Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-20 17:07       ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151632009605.21271.11304291057104672116.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ahonig@google.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chunkeey@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.