All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Debora Velarde <debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:08:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110102308.43145.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110101957.25322.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>

On Monday 10 of October 2011, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 10 of October 2011, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 10/10/2011 01:05 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 of October 2011, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> > >> On 09/10/11 23:29, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >>> On 10/09/2011 04:51 PM, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> > >>>> On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >>>>> Another week, another -rc.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> suspend to ram regression is annoying (still visible on rc9;
> > >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/24/76) but unfortunately maintainers
> > >>>> are silent.
> > >>> 
> > >>> I tried -rc9 on my Lenovo W500 with that same TPM. I cannot reproduce
> > >>> the 'scheduling while atomic' problem you had reported earlier. I
> > >>> also could suspend / resume fine as long as I did the following:
> > >>> 
> > >>> - suspended with the tpm_tis driver as module in the kernel
> > >>> - once a suspend was done without the tpm_tis driver the subsequent
> > >>> suspends were all done without the tpm_tis driver
> > >>> 
> > >>> Once I had done a suspend/resume with the tpm_tis driver *not* in the
> > >>> kernel and then again a suspend with the tpm_tis driver in the
> > >>> kernel, it did not resume anymore. I believe previously (previous
> > >>> version of kernel and/or Fedora) it refused to even suspend. The
> > >>> reason why this doesn't work properly is that the driver has to send
> > >>> a command to the TPM upon suspend and the BIOS then sends the
> > >>> corresponding wakeup command.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Did you maybe previously suspend/resume without a tpm_tis driver and
> > >>> then try to suspend with it ?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Also, my Lenovo W500 shows particularly odd behavior when I switch
> > >>> from Windows to Linux. The first suspend with a Linux booted after
> > >>> Windows (with or without tpm_tis driver) does *not* resume (reboot
> > >>> required). A subsequently rebooted Linux makes the suspend/resume
> > >>> work fine.
> > >>> 
> > >>>     Stefan
> > >> 
> > >> Arkadiusz,
> > >> 
> > >> Do you still see the issue with this patch [1][2] applied?
> > > 
> > > The issue doesn't happen with this patch but error condition with
> > > "Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working correctly." is triggered
> > > immediately at boot, even before suspend is used.
> > > 
> > > $ dmesg|grep -iE "(tpm|suspend)"
> > > [   12.640039] tpm_tis 00:0a: 1.2 TPM (device-id 0x1020, rev-id 6)
> > > [   12.640048] tpm_tis 00:0a: Intel iTPM workaround enabled
> > > [   12.768057] tpm_tis 00:0a: Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working
> > > correctly.
> > > [   12.768066] tpm_tis 00:0a: Was machine previously suspended without
> > > TPM driver present?
> > > [   88.512117] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> > 
> > Though I suppose that now your suspend/resume cycles always work?
> 
> Tried several times and it always worked, so probably yes. Longer testing
> will give definitive answer.
> 
> > I guess the BIOS seems not to be initializing the TPM correctly. Any
> > chance you can get a hold of a BIOS update for your machine?
> 
> Then I looked into bios options on this thinkpad t400 and there are 3
> possible TPM settings: Enabled, Invisible, Disabled.
> 
> Invisible is - visible but not working - according to bios help. No idea
> why such option exists but I had it enabled.
> 
> Right now I've set that to "Enabled" and ran few suspend/resume cycles - no
> problems so far.

Unfortunately TPM enabled in bios + kernel (3.1.0-rc9-00064-g65112dc-dirty) 
with the patch applied

[11629.922643] legacy_resume(): pnp_bus_resume+0x0/0x67 returns -19
[11629.922646] PM: Device 00:0a failed to resume: error -19


and there is no "Could not read PCR 0. TPM is not working correctly." message, 
so this check  doesn't seem to be good enough.

> 
> I guess there is some way to make "Invisible" mode properly handled in
> Linux, too.
> 
> >     Stefan


-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-05  1:40 Linux 3.1-rc9 Linus Torvalds
2011-10-07  7:08 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 17:48   ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 18:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-08  0:33       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08  0:50       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08  7:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-12 21:35           ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-13 23:25             ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-17  1:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17  4:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17  9:03                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-17 10:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 11:40                       ` Alan Cox
2011-10-17 18:49                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 20:35                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:19                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 21:22                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:39                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:03                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:04                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:08                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18  6:01                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18  7:12                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-18 18:50                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:31                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17  7:55                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17  9:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17  9:18                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 20:48                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18  7:20                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 10:34                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 14:07                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 14:57                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 17:54                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 18:31                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 19:23                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 21:00                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18  8:39                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18  9:05                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18 14:59                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-18 15:26                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 18:07                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 18:14                                   ` [GIT PULL] timer fix Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 16:13                                 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Dave Jones
2011-10-18 18:20                                 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-18 19:48                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 20:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 15:26                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-26  1:47                                         ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 19:02                                     ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-25  7:13                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25  9:01                                         ` David Miller
2011-10-25 12:30                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-25 23:18                                             ` David Miller
2011-10-25 20:20                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-31 17:32                                         ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 16:40                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 17:27                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:46                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:53                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:00                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 18:05                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:10                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:49                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:58                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 19:16                                                   ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 22:42                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03  0:24                                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-03  0:52                                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03 22:07                                                         ` David Miller
2011-11-03  6:06                                                       ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2011-11-03  6:26                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03  6:43                                                           ` David Miller
2011-11-02 17:54                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 18:04                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:28                                             ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 18:30                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 22:10                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-02 23:00                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03  0:09                                               ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03  0:15                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03  0:17                                                   ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-18 23:11                                         ` [tip:perf/core] lockdep: Show subclass in pretty print of lockdep output tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-10-20 14:36                 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-23 11:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-24  7:48                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-24  7:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-24  8:08                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-18  5:40             ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-09 20:51 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10  2:29   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 16:23     ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-10-10 17:05       ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 17:22         ` Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 17:57           ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 21:08             ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz [this message]
2011-10-11  7:09             ` [tpmdd-devel] " Peter.Huewe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201110102308.43145.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --to=a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.selhorst@sirrix.com \
    --cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.