All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:00:35 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110172237030.3240@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318879396.4172.92.camel@twins>

On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 11:31 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > > I could of course propose this... but I really won't since I'm half
> > > retching by now.. ;-)
> > 
> > Wow. Is this "ugly and fragile code week" and I just didn't get the memo?
> 
> Do I get a price?
> 
> > I do wonder if we might not fix the problem by just taking the
> > *existing* lock in the right order?
> > 
> > IOW, how nasty would be it be to make "scheduler_tick()" just get the
> > cputimer->lock outside or rq->lock?
> > 
> > Sure, we'd hold that lock *much* longer than we need, but how much do
> > we care? Is that a lock that gets contention? It migth be the simple
> > solution for now - I *would* like to get 3.1 out..
> 
> Ah, sadly the tick isn't the only one with the inverted callchain,
> pretty much every callchain in the scheduler ends up in update_curr()
> one way or another.
> 
> The easier way around might be something like this... even when two
> threads in a process race to enable this clock the the wasted time is
> pretty much of the same order as we would otherwise have wasted spinning
> on the lock and the update_gt_cputime() think would end up moving the
> clock fwd to the latest outcome any which way.
> 
> Humm,. Thomas anything?
 
No, that should work. It does not make that call path more racy
against exit, which is another trainwreck at least on 32bit machines
which I discovered while looking for the problems with your patch.

thread_group_cputime() reads task->signal->utime/stime/sum_sched_runtime

These fields are updated in __exit_signal() w/o holding
task->signal->cputimer.lock. So nothing prevents that these values
change while we read them.

All callers of thread_group_cputime() except the scheduler callpath
hold sighand lock, which is also taken in __exit_signal().

So your patch does not make that particular case worse.

That said, I really need some sleep before I can make a final
judgement on that horror. The call paths are such an intermingled mess
that it's not funny anymore. I do that tomorrow morning first thing.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-17 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-05  1:40 Linux 3.1-rc9 Linus Torvalds
2011-10-07  7:08 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 17:48   ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-07 18:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-08  0:33       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08  0:50       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-08  7:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-12 21:35           ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-13 23:25             ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-17  1:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17  4:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17  9:03                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-17 10:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 11:40                       ` Alan Cox
2011-10-17 18:49                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 20:35                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:19                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 21:22                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:39                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:03                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:04                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17 22:08                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18  6:01                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18  7:12                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-18 18:50                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-17 21:31                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-17  7:55                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17  9:12                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17  9:18                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 20:48                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-18  7:20                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 10:34                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 14:07                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-17 14:57                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 17:54                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 18:31                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-17 19:23                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-17 21:00                           ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-10-18  8:39                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18  9:05                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18 14:59                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-18 15:26                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 18:07                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 18:14                                   ` [GIT PULL] timer fix Ingo Molnar
2011-10-18 16:13                                 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Dave Jones
2011-10-18 18:20                                 ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-18 19:48                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-18 20:12                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 15:26                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-26  1:47                                         ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 19:02                                     ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-25  7:13                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25  9:01                                         ` David Miller
2011-10-25 12:30                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-25 23:18                                             ` David Miller
2011-10-25 20:20                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-31 17:32                                         ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 16:40                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 17:27                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:46                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:53                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:00                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 18:05                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:10                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-11-02 17:49                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 17:58                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 19:16                                                   ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 22:42                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03  0:24                                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-03  0:52                                                       ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03 22:07                                                         ` David Miller
2011-11-03  6:06                                                       ` Jörg-Volker Peetz
2011-11-03  6:26                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-03  6:43                                                           ` David Miller
2011-11-02 17:54                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 18:04                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-02 18:28                                             ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-02 18:30                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-11-02 22:10                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-02 23:00                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03  0:09                                               ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-03  0:15                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-11-03  0:17                                                   ` Simon Kirby
2011-11-18 23:11                                         ` [tip:perf/core] lockdep: Show subclass in pretty print of lockdep output tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-10-20 14:36                 ` Linux 3.1-rc9 Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-23 11:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-24  7:48                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-24  7:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-24  8:08                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2011-10-18  5:40             ` Simon Kirby
2011-10-09 20:51 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10  2:29   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 16:23     ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-10-10 17:05       ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 17:22         ` Stefan Berger
2011-10-10 17:57           ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-10 21:08             ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-10-11  7:09             ` [tpmdd-devel] " Peter.Huewe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1110172237030.3240@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sim@hostway.ca \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.