All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 21:33:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151102213305.GA1158@tetsubishi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446482175-26507-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]


> The first patches fixes the build problem, and the second patch reverts the
> patch that removed the driver from arm64 builds. The final patch add a compat
> string for the r8a7795 (arm64) device.

Thanks. I will test them next week when I have access to my board again.

> Apart from patches to add the PCIe clock and DT nodes, I had to revert these
> patches to get it to work on arm64:
>  f075915ac0b1 ("PCI/MSI: Drop domain field from msi_controller")
>  d8a1cb757550 ("PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct device::msi_domain")

Does that solve the MSI problems you mentioned?

Regards,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:33:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151102213305.GA1158@tetsubishi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446482175-26507-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]


> The first patches fixes the build problem, and the second patch reverts the
> patch that removed the driver from arm64 builds. The final patch add a compat
> string for the r8a7795 (arm64) device.

Thanks. I will test them next week when I have access to my board again.

> Apart from patches to add the PCIe clock and DT nodes, I had to revert these
> patches to get it to work on arm64:
>  f075915ac0b1 ("PCI/MSI: Drop domain field from msi_controller")
>  d8a1cb757550 ("PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct device::msi_domain")

Does that solve the MSI problems you mentioned?

Regards,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-02 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-02 16:36 [PATCH 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64 Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36 ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: pcie-rcar: Convert to DT resource parsing API Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36   ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-07 13:29   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-07 13:29     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-09  9:31     ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-09  9:31       ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "PCI: rcar: Build pcie-rcar.c only on ARM" Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36   ` Phil Edworthy
     [not found] ` <1446482175-26507-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-02 16:36   ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: pcie-rcar: Add support for R-Car H3 Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36     ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-02 16:36     ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-07 13:29     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-07 13:29       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-02 21:33 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-11-02 21:33   ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix rcar-pcie for arm64 Wolfram Sang
2015-11-03  9:00   ` Phil Edworthy
2015-11-03  9:00     ` Phil Edworthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151102213305.GA1158@tetsubishi \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.