From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@mulix.org>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] dma-direct: handle the memory encryption bit in common code Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:55:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180319165551.GE14916@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180319160343.GA29002@lst.de> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:48:33PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > Why can't we just resolve the conflict by adding the underscores? > > We can solve the conflict easily that way. But that's not the point. > > The point is that I've been fighting hard to consolidate dma code > given that the behavior really is common and not arch specific. And > this one is another case like that: the fact that the non-coherent > dma boundary is bigger than the exposed size is something that can > easily happen elsewhere, so there is no need to duplicate a lot > of code for that. Fair enough, although I wouldn't say it's a *lot* of code being duplicated. Are there other architectures working around this issue too? I couldn't see anything in the other dma-direct.h headers. > Nevermind that the commit should at least be three different patches: > > (1) revert the broken original commit > (2) increase the dma min alignment > (3) put the swiotlb workaround in place I'd agree with you if this wasn't already queued and sitting in -next. Reverting what we currently have seems a bit OTT now. Catalin? Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix-BzGcCpaT2IbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] dma-direct: handle the memory encryption bit in common code Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:55:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180319165551.GE14916@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180319160343.GA29002-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:48:33PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > Why can't we just resolve the conflict by adding the underscores? > > We can solve the conflict easily that way. But that's not the point. > > The point is that I've been fighting hard to consolidate dma code > given that the behavior really is common and not arch specific. And > this one is another case like that: the fact that the non-coherent > dma boundary is bigger than the exposed size is something that can > easily happen elsewhere, so there is no need to duplicate a lot > of code for that. Fair enough, although I wouldn't say it's a *lot* of code being duplicated. Are there other architectures working around this issue too? I couldn't see anything in the other dma-direct.h headers. > Nevermind that the commit should at least be three different patches: > > (1) revert the broken original commit > (2) increase the dma min alignment > (3) put the swiotlb workaround in place I'd agree with you if this wasn't already queued and sitting in -next. Reverting what we currently have seems a bit OTT now. Catalin? Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 16:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-03-19 10:38 use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3 Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 01/14] x86: remove X86_PPRO_FENCE Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 11:04 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/cpu: Remove the CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE=y quirk tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 02/14] x86: remove dma_alloc_coherent_mask Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:48 ` [tip:x86/dma] x86/dma: Remove dma_alloc_coherent_mask() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 03/14] x86: use dma-direct Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:49 ` [tip:x86/dma] x86/dma: Use DMA-direct (CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y) tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86: use generic swiotlb_ops Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:49 ` [tip:x86/dma] x86/dma: Use " tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 05/14] x86/amd_gart: look at coherent_dma_mask instead of GFP_DMA Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:50 ` [tip:x86/dma] x86/dma/amd_gart: Look at dev->coherent_dma_mask " tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 06/14] x86/amd_gart: use dma_direct_{alloc,free} Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:50 ` [tip:x86/dma] x86/dma/amd_gart: Use dma_direct_{alloc,free}() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 07/14] iommu/amd_iommu: use dma_direct_{alloc,free} Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:51 ` [tip:x86/dma] iommu/amd_iommu: Use CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and dma_direct_{alloc,free}() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 08/14] iommu/intel-iommu: cleanup intel_{alloc,free}_coherent Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:51 ` [tip:x86/dma] iommu/intel-iommu: Enable CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS=y and clean up intel_{alloc,free}_coherent() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 09/14] x86: remove dma_alloc_coherent_gfp_flags Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:52 ` [tip:x86/dma] x86/dma: Remove dma_alloc_coherent_gfp_flags() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 10/14] set_memory.h: provide set_memory_{en,de}crypted stubs Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 14:21 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-23 19:52 ` [tip:x86/dma] set_memory.h: Provide set_memory_{en,de}crypted() stubs tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 11/14] swiotlb: remove swiotlb_set_mem_attributes Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 14:41 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-23 19:52 ` [tip:x86/dma] dma/swiotlb: Remove swiotlb_set_mem_attributes() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 12/14] dma-direct: handle the memory encryption bit in common code Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 14:50 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 14:50 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 15:19 ` Robin Murphy 2018-03-19 15:19 ` Robin Murphy 2018-03-19 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 15:37 ` Robin Murphy 2018-03-19 15:37 ` Robin Murphy 2018-03-19 15:48 ` Will Deacon 2018-03-19 15:48 ` Will Deacon 2018-03-19 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 16:55 ` Will Deacon [this message] 2018-03-19 16:55 ` Will Deacon 2018-03-19 18:01 ` Catalin Marinas 2018-03-19 18:01 ` Catalin Marinas 2018-03-19 19:49 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 19:49 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas 2018-03-20 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas 2018-03-23 19:53 ` [tip:x86/dma] dma/direct: Handle " tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 13/14] dma-direct: handle force decryption for dma coherent buffers " Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 14:51 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 14:51 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-23 19:53 ` [tip:x86/dma] dma/direct: Handle force decryption for DMA " tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` [PATCH 14/14] swiotlb: remove swiotlb_{alloc,free}_coherent Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-23 19:54 ` [tip:x86/dma] dma/swiotlb: Remove swiotlb_{alloc,free}_coherent() tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-19 14:00 ` use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3 Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 14:00 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-03-19 14:56 ` Thomas Gleixner 2018-03-19 14:56 ` Thomas Gleixner 2018-03-19 15:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-03-19 15:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-03-19 15:28 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-03-20 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-03-20 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-03-20 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar [not found] ` <20180320090351.2qnwcsauhodrqxdj-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2018-03-20 11:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-03-20 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-20 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-21 14:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-03-21 14:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2018-03-14 17:51 use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V2 Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-14 17:52 ` [PATCH 12/14] dma-direct: handle the memory encryption bit in common code Christoph Hellwig 2018-03-14 17:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180319165551.GE14916@arm.com \ --to=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mulix@mulix.org \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.