All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dvyukov@google.com, will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:47:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505084721.GA32344@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505081100.nsyrqrpzq2vd27bk@gmail.com>

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:11:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Before:
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec(v)	        atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
>  #else /* atomic_fetch_dec */
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed	atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire	atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release	atomic_fetch_dec
>  #endif /* atomic_fetch_dec */
> 
>  #else /* atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed */
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)					\
> 	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #endif
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)					\
> 	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #endif
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec(...)						\
> 	__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #endif
>  #endif /* atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed */
> 
> After:
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
>  # else
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
>  # endif
>  #else
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  #endif
> 
> The new variant is readable at a glance, and the hierarchy of defines is very 
> obvious as well.

It wraps and looks hideous in my normal setup. And I do detest that indent
after # thing.

> And I think we could do even better - there's absolutely no reason why _every_ 
> operation has to be made conditional on a finegrained level - they are overriden 
> in API groups. In fact allowing individual override is arguably a fragility.
> 
> So we could do the following simplification on top of that:
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
>  # else
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
>  # endif
>  #else
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  #endif

This would disallow an architecture to override just fetch_dec_release for
instance.

I don't think there currently is any architecture that does that, but the
intent was to allow it to override anything and only provide defaults where it
does not.

None of this takes away the giant trainwreck that is the annotated atomic stuff
though.

And I seriously hate this one:

  ba1c9f83f633 ("locking/atomic/x86: Un-macro-ify atomic ops implementation")

and will likely undo that the moment I need to change anything there.

So no, don't like.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:47:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505084721.GA32344@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505081100.nsyrqrpzq2vd27bk@gmail.com>

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:11:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Before:
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec(v)	        atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)	atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
>  #else /* atomic_fetch_dec */
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed	atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire	atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release	atomic_fetch_dec
>  #endif /* atomic_fetch_dec */
> 
>  #else /* atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed */
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)					\
> 	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #endif
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)					\
> 	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #endif
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #define atomic_fetch_dec(...)						\
> 	__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #endif
>  #endif /* atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed */
> 
> After:
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
>  # else
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
>  # endif
>  #else
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_acquire
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_release
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  #endif
> 
> The new variant is readable at a glance, and the hierarchy of defines is very 
> obvious as well.

It wraps and looks hideous in my normal setup. And I do detest that indent
after # thing.

> And I think we could do even better - there's absolutely no reason why _every_ 
> operation has to be made conditional on a finegrained level - they are overriden 
> in API groups. In fact allowing individual override is arguably a fragility.
> 
> So we could do the following simplification on top of that:
> 
>  #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(v)			atomic_fetch_sub(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(1, (v))
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(v)		atomic_fetch_sub_release(1, (v))
>  # else
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire		atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release		atomic_fetch_dec
>  # endif
>  #else
>  # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  #  define atomic_fetch_dec_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_dec, __VA_ARGS__)
>  # endif
>  #endif

This would disallow an architecture to override just fetch_dec_release for
instance.

I don't think there currently is any architecture that does that, but the
intent was to allow it to override anything and only provide defaults where it
does not.

None of this takes away the giant trainwreck that is the annotated atomic stuff
though.

And I seriously hate this one:

  ba1c9f83f633 ("locking/atomic/x86: Un-macro-ify atomic ops implementation")

and will likely undo that the moment I need to change anything there.

So no, don't like.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-05  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-04 17:39 [PATCH 0/6] arm64: add instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument ordering variants Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:09     ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:09       ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:12         ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-05  9:12           ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-05  8:11       ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:36         ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:54           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:15             ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 14:15             ` [PATCH] " Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:15               ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 12:14           ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-09  7:33             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-09 13:03               ` Will Deacon
2018-05-15  8:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15  8:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15 11:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 12:13                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 15:43                   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-15 17:10                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 17:53                       ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-15 18:11                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 18:15                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 18:52                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-15 19:39                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-21 17:12                           ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-06 14:12           ` [PATCH] " Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:12             ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 14:57               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  9:54               ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-07  9:54                 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-18 18:43               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-05-18 18:43                 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-05-05  8:47         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-05-05  8:47           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:00               ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Introduce optimized cmpxchg_release() family of APIs for PowerPC Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:26                 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:26                   ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06  1:56                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-06  1:56                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-05 10:16               ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:16                 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:35                 ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Clarify why the cmpxchg_relaxed() family of APIs falls back to full cmpxchg() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:35                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 11:28                   ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 11:28                     ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 13:27                     ` [PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 13:27                       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 14:03                       ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 14:03                         ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06 12:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:11                           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  1:04                           ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-07  1:04                             ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-07  6:50                             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  6:50                               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:13                     ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Boqun Feng
2018-05-07 13:31                       ` [PATCH v2] " Boqun Feng
2018-05-07 13:31                         ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05  9:05           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-05  9:05             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-05  9:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:32               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-07  6:43               ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/x86/64: Clean up and fix details of <asm/atomic64_64.h> Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  6:43                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:09           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:09             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 10:48               ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:48                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:59                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:59                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:15                 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:14         ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument atomic*andnot*() Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: use <linux/atomic.h> for cmpxchg Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: fix assembly constraints " Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: use instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: instrument smp_{load_acquire,store_release} Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180505084721.GA32344@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.