All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dvyukov@google.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:54:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505085445.cmdnqh6xpnpfoqzb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505083635.622xmcvb42dw5xxh@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> Note that the simplest definition block is now:
> 
> #ifndef atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed
> # define atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed			atomic_cmpxchg
> # define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire			atomic_cmpxchg
> # define atomic_cmpxchg_release			atomic_cmpxchg
> #else
> # ifndef atomic_cmpxchg
> #  define atomic_cmpxchg(...)			__atomic_op_fence(atomic_cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #  define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(...)		__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #  define atomic_cmpxchg_release(...)		__atomic_op_release(atomic_cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> # endif
> #endif
> 
> ... which is very readable!
> 
> The total linecount reduction of the two patches is pretty significant as well:
> 
>  include/linux/atomic.h | 1063 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 343 insertions(+), 720 deletions(-)

BTW., I noticed two asymmetries while cleaning up this code:

==============>

#ifdef atomic_andnot

#ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed
# define atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed            atomic_fetch_andnot
# define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire            atomic_fetch_andnot
# define atomic_fetch_andnot_release            atomic_fetch_andnot
#else
# ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot
#  define atomic_fetch_andnot(...)              __atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)      __atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_release(...)      __atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
# endif
#endif

#endif /* atomic_andnot */

...

#ifdef atomic64_andnot

#ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed
# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed          atomic64_fetch_andnot
# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire          atomic64_fetch_andnot
# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release          atomic64_fetch_andnot
#else
# ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot
#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot(...)            __atomic_op_fence(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)    __atomic_op_acquire(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(...)    __atomic_op_release(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
# endif
#endif

#endif /* atomic64_andnot */

<==============

Why do these two API groups have an outer condition, i.e.:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic_andnot */
 ...
 #ifdef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic64_andnot */

because the base APIs themselves are optional and have a default implementation:

 #ifndef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif
 ...
 #ifndef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif

I think it's overall cleaner if we combine them into continous blocks, defining 
all variants of an API group in a single place:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 #else
 #endif

etc.

The patch below implements this.

Thanks,

	Ingo

===================>
>From f5efafa83af8c46b9e81b010b46caeeadb450179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:46:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions

The atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() are defined in 4 separate groups
spred out in the atomic.h header:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic_andnot */
 ...
 #ifndef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif
 ...
 #ifdef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic64_andnot */
 ...
 #ifndef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif

Combine them into unify them into two groups:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 #else
 #endif

 ...

 #ifdef atomic64_andnot
 #else
 #endif

So that one API group is defined in a single place within the header.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/atomic.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
index 352ecc72d7f5..1176cf7c6f03 100644
--- a/include/linux/atomic.h
+++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
@@ -205,22 +205,6 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
-#ifdef atomic_andnot
-
-#ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed
-# define atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic_fetch_andnot_release		atomic_fetch_andnot
-#else
-# ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot
-#  define atomic_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-# endif
-#endif
-
-#endif /* atomic_andnot */
-
 #ifndef atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed
 # define atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed		atomic_fetch_xor
 # define atomic_fetch_xor_acquire		atomic_fetch_xor
@@ -338,7 +322,22 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
 # define atomic_inc_not_zero(v)			atomic_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
 #endif
 
-#ifndef atomic_andnot
+#ifdef atomic_andnot
+
+#ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed
+# define atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic_fetch_andnot_release		atomic_fetch_andnot
+#else
+# ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot
+#  define atomic_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+# endif
+#endif
+
+#else /* !atomic_andnot: */
+
 static inline void atomic_andnot(int i, atomic_t *v)
 {
 	atomic_and(~i, v);
@@ -363,7 +362,8 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_andnot_release(int i, atomic_t *v)
 {
 	return atomic_fetch_and_release(~i, v);
 }
-#endif
+
+#endif /* !atomic_andnot */
 
 /**
  * atomic_inc_not_zero_hint - increment if not null
@@ -600,22 +600,6 @@ static inline int atomic_dec_if_positive(atomic_t *v)
 # endif
 #endif
 
-#ifdef atomic64_andnot
-
-#ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed
-# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic64_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic64_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release		atomic64_fetch_andnot
-#else
-# ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot
-#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-# endif
-#endif
-
-#endif /* atomic64_andnot */
-
 #ifndef atomic64_fetch_xor_relaxed
 # define atomic64_fetch_xor_relaxed		atomic64_fetch_xor
 # define atomic64_fetch_xor_acquire		atomic64_fetch_xor
@@ -672,7 +656,22 @@ static inline int atomic_dec_if_positive(atomic_t *v)
 # define atomic64_try_cmpxchg_release		atomic64_try_cmpxchg
 #endif
 
-#ifndef atomic64_andnot
+#ifdef atomic64_andnot
+
+#ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed
+# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic64_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic64_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release		atomic64_fetch_andnot
+#else
+# ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot
+#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+# endif
+#endif
+
+#else /* !atomic64_andnot: */
+
 static inline void atomic64_andnot(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
 {
 	atomic64_and(~i, v);
@@ -697,7 +696,8 @@ static inline long long atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(long long i, atomic64_t *v
 {
 	return atomic64_fetch_and_release(~i, v);
 }
-#endif
+
+#endif /* !atomic64_andnot */
 
 #define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed(v, c)	smp_cond_load_relaxed(&(v)->counter, (c))
 #define atomic64_cond_read_acquire(v, c)	smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:54:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180505085445.cmdnqh6xpnpfoqzb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180505083635.622xmcvb42dw5xxh@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> Note that the simplest definition block is now:
> 
> #ifndef atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed
> # define atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed			atomic_cmpxchg
> # define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire			atomic_cmpxchg
> # define atomic_cmpxchg_release			atomic_cmpxchg
> #else
> # ifndef atomic_cmpxchg
> #  define atomic_cmpxchg(...)			__atomic_op_fence(atomic_cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #  define atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(...)		__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> #  define atomic_cmpxchg_release(...)		__atomic_op_release(atomic_cmpxchg, __VA_ARGS__)
> # endif
> #endif
> 
> ... which is very readable!
> 
> The total linecount reduction of the two patches is pretty significant as well:
> 
>  include/linux/atomic.h | 1063 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 343 insertions(+), 720 deletions(-)

BTW., I noticed two asymmetries while cleaning up this code:

==============>

#ifdef atomic_andnot

#ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed
# define atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed            atomic_fetch_andnot
# define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire            atomic_fetch_andnot
# define atomic_fetch_andnot_release            atomic_fetch_andnot
#else
# ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot
#  define atomic_fetch_andnot(...)              __atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)      __atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_release(...)      __atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
# endif
#endif

#endif /* atomic_andnot */

...

#ifdef atomic64_andnot

#ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed
# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed          atomic64_fetch_andnot
# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire          atomic64_fetch_andnot
# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release          atomic64_fetch_andnot
#else
# ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot
#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot(...)            __atomic_op_fence(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)    __atomic_op_acquire(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(...)    __atomic_op_release(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
# endif
#endif

#endif /* atomic64_andnot */

<==============

Why do these two API groups have an outer condition, i.e.:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic_andnot */
 ...
 #ifdef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic64_andnot */

because the base APIs themselves are optional and have a default implementation:

 #ifndef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif
 ...
 #ifndef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif

I think it's overall cleaner if we combine them into continous blocks, defining 
all variants of an API group in a single place:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 #else
 #endif

etc.

The patch below implements this.

Thanks,

	Ingo

===================>
>From f5efafa83af8c46b9e81b010b46caeeadb450179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:46:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions

The atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() are defined in 4 separate groups
spred out in the atomic.h header:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic_andnot */
 ...
 #ifndef atomic_andnot
 ...
 #endif
 ...
 #ifdef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif /* atomic64_andnot */
 ...
 #ifndef atomic64_andnot
 ...
 #endif

Combine them into unify them into two groups:

 #ifdef atomic_andnot
 #else
 #endif

 ...

 #ifdef atomic64_andnot
 #else
 #endif

So that one API group is defined in a single place within the header.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/atomic.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
index 352ecc72d7f5..1176cf7c6f03 100644
--- a/include/linux/atomic.h
+++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
@@ -205,22 +205,6 @@
 # endif
 #endif
 
-#ifdef atomic_andnot
-
-#ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed
-# define atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic_fetch_andnot_release		atomic_fetch_andnot
-#else
-# ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot
-#  define atomic_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-# endif
-#endif
-
-#endif /* atomic_andnot */
-
 #ifndef atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed
 # define atomic_fetch_xor_relaxed		atomic_fetch_xor
 # define atomic_fetch_xor_acquire		atomic_fetch_xor
@@ -338,7 +322,22 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
 # define atomic_inc_not_zero(v)			atomic_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
 #endif
 
-#ifndef atomic_andnot
+#ifdef atomic_andnot
+
+#ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed
+# define atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic_fetch_andnot_release		atomic_fetch_andnot
+#else
+# ifndef atomic_fetch_andnot
+#  define atomic_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+# endif
+#endif
+
+#else /* !atomic_andnot: */
+
 static inline void atomic_andnot(int i, atomic_t *v)
 {
 	atomic_and(~i, v);
@@ -363,7 +362,8 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_andnot_release(int i, atomic_t *v)
 {
 	return atomic_fetch_and_release(~i, v);
 }
-#endif
+
+#endif /* !atomic_andnot */
 
 /**
  * atomic_inc_not_zero_hint - increment if not null
@@ -600,22 +600,6 @@ static inline int atomic_dec_if_positive(atomic_t *v)
 # endif
 #endif
 
-#ifdef atomic64_andnot
-
-#ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed
-# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic64_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic64_fetch_andnot
-# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release		atomic64_fetch_andnot
-#else
-# ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot
-#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
-# endif
-#endif
-
-#endif /* atomic64_andnot */
-
 #ifndef atomic64_fetch_xor_relaxed
 # define atomic64_fetch_xor_relaxed		atomic64_fetch_xor
 # define atomic64_fetch_xor_acquire		atomic64_fetch_xor
@@ -672,7 +656,22 @@ static inline int atomic_dec_if_positive(atomic_t *v)
 # define atomic64_try_cmpxchg_release		atomic64_try_cmpxchg
 #endif
 
-#ifndef atomic64_andnot
+#ifdef atomic64_andnot
+
+#ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed
+# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed		atomic64_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire		atomic64_fetch_andnot
+# define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release		atomic64_fetch_andnot
+#else
+# ifndef atomic64_fetch_andnot
+#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot(...)		__atomic_op_fence(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_acquire(...)	__atomic_op_acquire(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+#  define atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(...)	__atomic_op_release(atomic64_fetch_andnot, __VA_ARGS__)
+# endif
+#endif
+
+#else /* !atomic64_andnot: */
+
 static inline void atomic64_andnot(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
 {
 	atomic64_and(~i, v);
@@ -697,7 +696,8 @@ static inline long long atomic64_fetch_andnot_release(long long i, atomic64_t *v
 {
 	return atomic64_fetch_and_release(~i, v);
 }
-#endif
+
+#endif /* !atomic64_andnot */
 
 #define atomic64_cond_read_relaxed(v, c)	smp_cond_load_relaxed(&(v)->counter, (c))
 #define atomic64_cond_read_acquire(v, c)	smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-05  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-04 17:39 [PATCH 0/6] arm64: add instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument ordering variants Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:09     ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:09       ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 18:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-04 18:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:12         ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-05  9:12           ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-05  8:11       ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:36         ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  8:54           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-05-05  8:54             ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Combine the atomic_andnot() and atomic64_andnot() API definitions Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:15             ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 14:15             ` [PATCH] " Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:15               ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 12:14           ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-09  7:33             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-09 13:03               ` Will Deacon
2018-05-15  8:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15  8:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-15 11:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 12:13                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 15:43                   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-15 17:10                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 17:53                       ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-15 18:11                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 18:15                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-15 18:52                             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-15 19:39                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-21 17:12                           ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-06 14:12           ` [PATCH] " Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:12             ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-06 14:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 14:57               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  9:54               ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-07  9:54                 ` Andrea Parri
2018-05-18 18:43               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-05-18 18:43                 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-05-05  8:47         ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  8:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:00               ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Introduce optimized cmpxchg_release() family of APIs for PowerPC Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:00                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:26                 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:26                   ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06  1:56                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-06  1:56                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-05 10:16               ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:16                 ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 10:35                 ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Clarify why the cmpxchg_relaxed() family of APIs falls back to full cmpxchg() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:35                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 11:28                   ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 11:28                     ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 13:27                     ` [PATCH] locking/atomics/powerpc: Move cmpxchg helpers to asm/cmpxchg.h and define the full set of cmpxchg APIs Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 13:27                       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 14:03                       ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05 14:03                         ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-06 12:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:11                           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  1:04                           ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-07  1:04                             ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-07  6:50                             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  6:50                               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:13                     ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Boqun Feng
2018-05-07 13:31                       ` [PATCH v2] " Boqun Feng
2018-05-07 13:31                         ` Boqun Feng
2018-05-05  9:05           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-05  9:05             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-05  9:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:32               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-07  6:43               ` [RFC PATCH] locking/atomics/x86/64: Clean up and fix details of <asm/atomic64_64.h> Ingo Molnar
2018-05-07  6:43                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:09           ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:09             ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05  9:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05  9:29               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-05 10:48               ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op() Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:48                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:59                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-05 10:59                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:15                 ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-06 12:14         ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Clean up the atomic.h maze of #defines tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument atomic*andnot*() Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64: use <linux/atomic.h> for cmpxchg Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: fix assembly constraints " Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: use instrumented atomics Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: instrument smp_{load_acquire,store_release} Mark Rutland
2018-05-04 17:39   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180505085445.cmdnqh6xpnpfoqzb@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.