From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:43:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916154336.GA6628@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916134920.GA18267@ulmo>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:17:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 9/16/19 12:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:26 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > This small series is preparatory work for a series that I'm working on
> > > > > which attempts to establish a formal framework for system restart and
> > > > > power off.
> > > > >
> > > > > Guenter has done a lot of good work in this area, but it never got
> > > > > merged. I think this set is a valuable addition to the kernel because
> > > > > it converts all odd providers to the established mechanism for restart.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since this is stretched across both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, as well as
> > > > > PSCI, and given the SoC/board level of functionality, I think it might
> > > > > make sense to take this through the ARM SoC tree in order to simplify
> > > > > the interdependencies. But it should also be possible to take patches
> > > > > 1-4 via their respective trees this cycle and patches 5-6 through the
> > > > > ARM and arm64 trees for the next cycle, if that's preferred.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We tried this twice now, and it seems to go nowhere. What does it take
> > > > to get it applied ?
> > >
> > > Can you send a pull request to soc@kernel.org after the merge window,
> > > with everyone else on Cc? If nobody objects, I'll merge it through
> > > the soc tree.
> > >
> >
> > Sure, I'll rebase and do that.
>
> I've uploaded a rebased tree here:
>
> https://github.com/thierryreding/linux/tree/for-5.5/system-power-reset
>
> The first 6 patches in that tree correspond to this series. There were a
> couple of conflicts I had to resolve and I haven't fully tested the
> series yet, but if you haven't done any of the rebasing, the above may
> be useful to you.
>
Maybe Arnd can just use your branch (or rather part of it if you would
split it off) since you already did the work ?
Thanks,
Guenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:43:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190916154336.GA6628@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916134920.GA18267@ulmo>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 03:49:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 06:17:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 9/16/19 12:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:26 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > This small series is preparatory work for a series that I'm working on
> > > > > which attempts to establish a formal framework for system restart and
> > > > > power off.
> > > > >
> > > > > Guenter has done a lot of good work in this area, but it never got
> > > > > merged. I think this set is a valuable addition to the kernel because
> > > > > it converts all odd providers to the established mechanism for restart.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since this is stretched across both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, as well as
> > > > > PSCI, and given the SoC/board level of functionality, I think it might
> > > > > make sense to take this through the ARM SoC tree in order to simplify
> > > > > the interdependencies. But it should also be possible to take patches
> > > > > 1-4 via their respective trees this cycle and patches 5-6 through the
> > > > > ARM and arm64 trees for the next cycle, if that's preferred.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We tried this twice now, and it seems to go nowhere. What does it take
> > > > to get it applied ?
> > >
> > > Can you send a pull request to soc@kernel.org after the merge window,
> > > with everyone else on Cc? If nobody objects, I'll merge it through
> > > the soc tree.
> > >
> >
> > Sure, I'll rebase and do that.
>
> I've uploaded a rebased tree here:
>
> https://github.com/thierryreding/linux/tree/for-5.5/system-power-reset
>
> The first 6 patches in that tree correspond to this series. There were a
> couple of conflicts I had to resolve and I haven't fully tested the
> series yet, but if you haven't done any of the rebasing, the above may
> be useful to you.
>
Maybe Arnd can just use your branch (or rather part of it if you would
split it off) since you already did the work ?
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 11:05 [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart() Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: prima2: Register with kernel restart handler Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: xen: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart() Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-14 15:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: " Guenter Roeck
2019-09-14 15:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 13:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 13:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 13:49 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 13:49 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 15:43 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2019-09-16 15:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 15:50 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 15:50 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 20:28 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 20:28 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-17 0:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-09-17 0:41 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-09-17 7:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-17 7:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-17 13:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-17 13:06 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190916154336.GA6628@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.