All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:06:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6507fae-d0a6-00f4-4259-4084b6a442d8@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2y9OYL-pm38rcGvgzvjgErCUC1ckjVXhd3mb=YEXiD_g@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/17/19 12:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:28 PM Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> All of the patches beyond the 6 in this set rely on the system reset and
>> power "framework". I don't think there was broad concensus on that idea
>> yet.
> 
> Ok, I see.
> 
>> If you think it's worth another try I'm happy to send the patches
>> out again.
> 
> Maybe do that after we pull the first set into arm-soc then. If
> we can reach consensus, I can merge them as a follow-up,
> either through the soc tree as a new subsystem or through
> the asm-generic tree as cross-architecture work.
> 

I'd suggest to keep the two patch sets separate, though, and apply
the 6 system reset patches either way.

Thanks,
Guenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart()
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:06:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6507fae-d0a6-00f4-4259-4084b6a442d8@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2y9OYL-pm38rcGvgzvjgErCUC1ckjVXhd3mb=YEXiD_g@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/17/19 12:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:28 PM Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> All of the patches beyond the 6 in this set rely on the system reset and
>> power "framework". I don't think there was broad concensus on that idea
>> yet.
> 
> Ok, I see.
> 
>> If you think it's worth another try I'm happy to send the patches
>> out again.
> 
> Maybe do that after we pull the first set into arm-soc then. If
> we can reach consensus, I can merge them as a follow-up,
> either through the soc tree as a new subsystem or through
> the asm-generic tree as cross-architecture work.
> 

I'd suggest to keep the two patch sets separate, though, and apply
the 6 system reset patches either way.

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-17 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-30 11:05 [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart() Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: prima2: Register with kernel restart handler Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05   ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: xen: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05   ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05   ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05   ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart() Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05   ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: " Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 11:05   ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-14 15:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: " Guenter Roeck
2019-09-14 15:25   ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16  7:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16  7:49     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 13:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 13:17       ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 13:49       ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 13:49         ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 15:43         ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 15:43           ` Guenter Roeck
2019-09-16 15:50           ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 15:50             ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 16:29             ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 16:29               ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-16 20:28               ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-16 20:28                 ` Thierry Reding
2019-09-17  0:41                 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-09-17  0:41                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-09-17  7:01                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-17  7:01                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-17 13:06                   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2019-09-17 13:06                     ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6507fae-d0a6-00f4-4259-4084b6a442d8@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.