All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com, john.garry@huawei.com,
	vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the writing of the Status Register on micron flashes
Date: Thu,  9 Jan 2020 20:14:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200109191423.10589-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203144948.15137-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 14:50:01 UTC,  wrote:
> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> 
> Micron flashes do not support 16 bit writes on the Status Register.
> According to micron datasheets, when using the Write Status Register
> (01h) command, the chip select should be driven LOW and held LOW until
> the eighth bit of the last data byte has been latched in, after which
> it must be driven HIGH. If CS is not driven HIGH, the command is not
> executed, flag status register error bits are not set, and the write enable
> latch remains set to 1. This fixes the lock operations on micron flashes.
> 
> Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Fixes: 39d1e3340c73 ("mtd: spi-nor: Fix clearing of QE bit on lock()/unlock()")
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/fixes, thanks.

Miquel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com, john.garry@huawei.com,
	vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the writing of the Status Register on micron flashes
Date: Thu,  9 Jan 2020 20:14:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200109191423.10589-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203144948.15137-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 14:50:01 UTC,  wrote:
> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> 
> Micron flashes do not support 16 bit writes on the Status Register.
> According to micron datasheets, when using the Write Status Register
> (01h) command, the chip select should be driven LOW and held LOW until
> the eighth bit of the last data byte has been latched in, after which
> it must be driven HIGH. If CS is not driven HIGH, the command is not
> executed, flag status register error bits are not set, and the write enable
> latch remains set to 1. This fixes the lock operations on micron flashes.
> 
> Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Fixes: 39d1e3340c73 ("mtd: spi-nor: Fix clearing of QE bit on lock()/unlock()")
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git mtd/fixes, thanks.

Miquel

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-09 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-02 17:28 flash_lock issue for n25q 128mb spi nor part John Garry
2019-12-03  9:45 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 10:31   ` John Garry
2019-12-03 11:07     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 11:44       ` John Garry
2019-12-03 12:05         ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 12:27           ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 12:35             ` John Garry
2019-12-03 13:57               ` John Garry
2019-12-03 14:44                 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 15:29                   ` John Garry
2019-12-04 11:10                     ` John Garry
2019-12-16 18:09                       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-17  8:57                         ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-12-17 10:09                           ` John Garry
2020-01-09 10:36                           ` John Garry
2020-01-10 11:51                             ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-01-10 11:56                               ` John Garry
2020-01-15  9:28                                 ` John Garry
2020-03-09 10:15                               ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: Clear WEL bit when erase or program errors occur Tudor.Ambarus
2020-03-09 10:15                                 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix description of the sr_ready() return value Tudor.Ambarus
2020-03-09 15:04                                 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: Clear WEL bit when erase or program errors occur John Garry
2020-03-23 17:58                                   ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:16               ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the write Status Register on micron flashes Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:16                 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:50                 ` [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the writing of the " Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:50                   ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-04 10:18                   ` John Garry
2019-12-04 10:18                     ` John Garry
2020-01-09 19:14                   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-01-09 19:14                     ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200109191423.10589-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.