From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com Cc: slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, ravenexp@gmail.com, chainsaw@gentoo.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:20 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200610154923.27510-3-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> There exists redundant "be an" in the comment, remove it. Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- kernel/kmod.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c index 37c3c4b97b8e..3cd075ce2a1e 100644 --- a/kernel/kmod.c +++ b/kernel/kmod.c @@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ * * If you need less than 50 threads would mean we're dealing with systems * smaller than 3200 pages. This assumes you are capable of having ~13M memory, - * and this would only be an be an upper limit, after which the OOM killer - * would take effect. Systems like these are very unlikely if modules are - * enabled. + * and this would only be an upper limit, after which the OOM killer would take + * effect. Systems like these are very unlikely if modules are enabled. */ #define MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT 50 static atomic_t kmod_concurrent_max = ATOMIC_INIT(MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT); -- 2.26.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org, ravenexp@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, slyfox@gentoo.org, ast@kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>, keescook@chromium.org Subject: [Bridge] [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:49:30 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200610154923.27510-3-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200610154923.27510-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> There exists redundant "be an" in the comment, remove it. Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> --- kernel/kmod.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c index 37c3c4b97b8e..3cd075ce2a1e 100644 --- a/kernel/kmod.c +++ b/kernel/kmod.c @@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ * * If you need less than 50 threads would mean we're dealing with systems * smaller than 3200 pages. This assumes you are capable of having ~13M memory, - * and this would only be an be an upper limit, after which the OOM killer - * would take effect. Systems like these are very unlikely if modules are - * enabled. + * and this would only be an upper limit, after which the OOM killer would take + * effect. Systems like these are very unlikely if modules are enabled. */ #define MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT 50 static atomic_t kmod_concurrent_max = ATOMIC_INIT(MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT); -- 2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 15:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-10 15:49 [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message] 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-23 14:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-23 14:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-23 14:11 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-23 14:23 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-23 15:09 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-23 14:23 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 11:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 11:12 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 12:05 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 12:05 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 12:05 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 13:17 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 13:17 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 13:17 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 16:13 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 16:13 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 16:13 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 14:43 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-24 14:43 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-24 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-24 15:54 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 15:56 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 15:54 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 16:09 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 16:09 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 16:09 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-24 17:58 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 17:59 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 17:58 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:09 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:10 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:09 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:32 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:32 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:32 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:37 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:38 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-24 18:37 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-25 13:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-25 13:27 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-25 13:26 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-26 2:54 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 2:54 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 2:54 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 5:22 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-26 5:24 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-26 5:22 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-06-26 9:00 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-26 9:00 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-26 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig 2020-06-26 11:40 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 11:40 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 11:40 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 11:50 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 11:50 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-26 11:50 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-30 17:57 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-30 17:57 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-30 17:57 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 10:08 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 10:08 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 10:08 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 13:24 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-01 13:24 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-01 13:24 ` Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-01 13:53 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 13:53 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 13:53 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 14:08 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-01 14:08 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-01 14:08 ` Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-01 15:38 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 15:39 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 15:38 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 15:48 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 15:49 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 15:48 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 15:58 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 15:58 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 15:58 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 16:01 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 16:03 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 16:01 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-02 4:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-02 4:26 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-02 4:26 ` Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-02 19:46 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-02 19:47 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-02 19:46 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-03 0:52 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-03 0:52 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-03 0:52 ` Tetsuo Handa 2020-07-03 13:28 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-03 13:28 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-03 13:28 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 15:26 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 15:27 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 15:26 ` Christian Borntraeger 2020-07-01 13:46 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 13:46 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain 2020-07-01 13:46 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-10 15:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2020-06-18 0:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton 2020-06-18 0:43 ` [Bridge] " Andrew Morton 2020-06-18 0:43 ` Andrew Morton 2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-19 20:46 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-19 20:46 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-19 21:07 ` Luis Chamberlain 2020-06-19 21:07 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200610154923.27510-3-mcgrof@kernel.org \ --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \ --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \ --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \ --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=jmorris@namei.org \ --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \ --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \ --cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \ --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \ --cc=serge@hallyn.com \ --cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.