All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
	slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:53:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701135324.GS4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6792135-3285-0861-014e-3db85ea251dc@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:24:29PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2020/07/01 19:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 30.06.20 19:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:54:10AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>> [...]> 
> >>>>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>>>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>>>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>>>> and we did not do it before. 
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So the right fix is
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >>>>                  * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >>>>                  * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >>>>                  */
> >>>> -               if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >>>> +               if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >>>>                         sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> 
> Well, it is not br_stp_call_user() but br_stp_start() which is expecting
> to set sub_info->retval for both KWIFEXITED() case and KWIFSIGNALED() case.
> That is, sub_info->retval needs to carry raw value (i.e. without "umh: fix
> processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" will be the correct behavior).

br_stp_start() doesn't check for the raw value, it just checks for err
or !err. So the patch, "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is
used" propagates the correct error now.

Christian, can you try removing the binary temporarily and seeing if
you get your bridge working?

  Luis

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, bfields@fieldses.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
	slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:53:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701135324.GS4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6792135-3285-0861-014e-3db85ea251dc@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:24:29PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2020/07/01 19:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 30.06.20 19:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:54:10AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>> [...]> 
> >>>>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>>>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>>>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>>>> and we did not do it before. 
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So the right fix is
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >>>>                  * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >>>>                  * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >>>>                  */
> >>>> -               if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >>>> +               if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >>>>                         sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> 
> Well, it is not br_stp_call_user() but br_stp_start() which is expecting
> to set sub_info->retval for both KWIFEXITED() case and KWIFSIGNALED() case.
> That is, sub_info->retval needs to carry raw value (i.e. without "umh: fix
> processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" will be the correct behavior).

br_stp_start() doesn't check for the raw value, it just checks for err
or !err. So the patch, "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is
used" propagates the correct error now.

Christian, can you try removing the binary temporarily and seeing if
you get your bridge working?

  Luis

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	philipp.reisner@linbit.com, bfields@fieldses.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	kuba@kernel.org, serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, slyfox@gentoo.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, chainsaw@gentoo.org,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:53:27 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701135324.GS4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6792135-3285-0861-014e-3db85ea251dc@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:24:29PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2020/07/01 19:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 30.06.20 19:57, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:54:10AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24.06.20 20:32, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>> [...]> 
> >>>>> So the translations look correct. But your change is actually a sematic change
> >>>>> if(ret) will only trigger if there is an error
> >>>>> if (KWIFEXITED(ret)) will always trigger when the process ends. So we will always overwrite -ECHILD
> >>>>> and we did not do it before. 
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So the right fix is
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> index f81e8698e36e..a3a3196e84d1 100644
> >>>> --- a/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> +++ b/kernel/umh.c
> >>>> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void call_usermodehelper_exec_sync(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
> >>>>                  * the real error code is already in sub_info->retval or
> >>>>                  * sub_info->retval is 0 anyway, so don't mess with it then.
> >>>>                  */
> >>>> -               if (KWIFEXITED(ret))
> >>>> +               if (KWEXITSTATUS(ret))
> >>>>                         sub_info->retval = KWEXITSTATUS(ret);
> 
> Well, it is not br_stp_call_user() but br_stp_start() which is expecting
> to set sub_info->retval for both KWIFEXITED() case and KWIFSIGNALED() case.
> That is, sub_info->retval needs to carry raw value (i.e. without "umh: fix
> processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" will be the correct behavior).

br_stp_start() doesn't check for the raw value, it just checks for err
or !err. So the patch, "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is
used" propagates the correct error now.

Christian, can you try removing the binary temporarily and seeing if
you get your bridge working?

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 15:49 [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests: kmod: Use variable NAME in kmod_test_0001() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Remove redundant "be an" in the comment Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] test_kmod: Avoid potential double free in trigger_config_run_type() Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-23 14:11   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:12     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:11     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 15:09       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:12         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 12:05           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 14:43           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-24 15:54           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:56             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 15:54             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:09               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:58               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:59                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 17:58                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:10                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:38                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:27                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  2:54                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  2:54                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  2:54                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  5:22                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  5:24                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  5:22                           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  9:00                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  9:00                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26  9:00                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:40                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                               ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                                 ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 10:08                             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:24                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53                               ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-07-01 13:53                                 ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:53                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08                                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08                                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 14:08                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:38                                   ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:39                                     ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:38                                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:48                                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:49                                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:48                                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58                                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58                                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:58                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:01                                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:03                                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 16:01                                           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02  4:26                                     ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02  4:26                                       ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02  4:26                                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:46                                       ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:47                                         ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-02 19:46                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03  0:52                                         ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03  0:52                                           ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03  0:52                                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28                                           ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28                                             ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:28                                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:26                                 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:27                                   ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:26                                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46                             ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46                               ` [Bridge] linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 13:46                               ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-10 15:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: simplify kmod failure value Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` [Bridge] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-10 15:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2020-06-18  0:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] kmod/umh: a few fixes Andrew Morton
2020-06-18  0:43   ` [Bridge] " Andrew Morton
2020-06-18  0:43   ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-19 20:46   ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46     ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 20:46     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-19 21:07       ` [Bridge] " Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701135324.GS4332@42.do-not-panic.com \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markward@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.