From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem to json schema Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:25:54 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same. > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> > Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 15 --------------- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 1 + > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes > node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers > into the clock-output-names array. > > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI > -------------------------------- > - > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application > -processors and SCP. > - > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3] > - > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI. > - > -Required sub-node properties: > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based > + - arm,scpi-shmem Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel tree of either. Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem to json schema Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:25:54 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210526182807.548118-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:28:00PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Move the SRAM and shared memory binding for SCPI into the existing > Generic on-chip SRAM. We just need to update the compatible list and > there-by remove the whole old text format binding for the same. > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> > Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt | 15 --------------- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 1 + > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > index bcd6c3ec471e..bcb8b3d61e68 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt > @@ -56,21 +56,6 @@ Sub-nodes > node. It can be non linear and hence provide the mapping of identifiers > into the clock-output-names array. > > -SRAM and Shared Memory for SCPI > -------------------------------- > - > -A small area of SRAM is reserved for SCPI communication between application > -processors and SCP. > - > -The properties should follow the generic mmio-sram description found in [3] > - > -Each sub-node represents the reserved area for SCPI. > - > -Required sub-node properties: > -- reg : The base offset and size of the reserved area with the SRAM > -- compatible : should be "arm,scp-shmem" for Non-secure SRAM based > + - arm,scpi-shmem Which is correct? There's not a single other occurrance in the kernel tree of either. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 20:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-26 18:27 [PATCH 0/8] dt-bindings: firmware: Convert SCPI and SCMI to json schema Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:27 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 20:25 ` Rob Herring [this message] 2021-05-27 20:25 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-31 8:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-31 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-31 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-06-01 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem " Rob Herring 2021-06-01 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem " Rob Herring 2021-06-01 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-06-01 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Move arm,scmi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: Move arm, scmi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: firmware: juno,scpi: Move to sram.yaml " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: firmware: juno, scpi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic,scpi: Move arm,scpi-shmem to " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic, scpi: Move arm, scpi-shmem " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: Convert " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 14:23 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-27 14:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scpi: " Rob Herring 2021-05-27 16:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scpi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 16:17 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] dt-bindings: mailbox : arm,mhu: Fix arm,scpi example used here Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] dt-bindings: mailbox : arm, mhu: Fix arm, scpi " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 14:23 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-27 14:23 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-27 16:25 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 16:25 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 20:07 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-27 20:07 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-31 8:17 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-31 8:17 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic,scpi: Convert to json schema Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic, scpi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 20:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic,scpi: " Rob Herring 2021-05-27 20:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic, scpi: " Rob Herring 2021-05-31 8:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic,scpi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-31 8:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: firmware: amlogic, scpi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:28 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:35 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-26 18:35 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 20:15 ` Rob Herring 2021-05-27 20:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: " Rob Herring 2021-05-27 6:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " Etienne Carriere 2021-05-27 6:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: " Etienne Carriere 2021-05-27 10:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 10:53 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 10:33 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-05-27 10:33 ` Cristian Marussi 2021-05-27 10:49 ` Sudeep Holla 2021-05-27 10:49 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210527202554.GA1351447@robh.at.kernel.org \ --to=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \ --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.