From: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>, Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>, charles.chenxin@huawei.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:55:52 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <570C9BF8.7070400@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20160412064657.GF1714@lahna.fi.intel.com> 在 2016/4/12 14:46, Mika Westerberg 写道: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:43:22PM +0800, Jiang Qiu wrote: >>> Currently it just complains if something goes wrong. The GPIO driver >>> itself can still work just fine (including interrupts). >>> >>> I'm fine to change it to return an error code. >> Agree, if add a error code for acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(), it looks more pretty. >> >> However, this function is common for other part, maybe cause any other effects if I >> do this change, did you think so? > I'm thinking what the callers are going to do with the error code. > Basically it means that we were not able to attach and configure ACPI > event GPIOs. It does not prevent GPIO drivers from functioning so they > probably just print out some warning message and continue probing, and > we already warn in acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() if something fails. > > Unless Linus W insists, let's just keep it as is for now :) Fine to me, thanks:). > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>, Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>, <charles.chenxin@huawei.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:55:52 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <570C9BF8.7070400@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20160412064657.GF1714@lahna.fi.intel.com> 在 2016/4/12 14:46, Mika Westerberg 写道: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:43:22PM +0800, Jiang Qiu wrote: >>> Currently it just complains if something goes wrong. The GPIO driver >>> itself can still work just fine (including interrupts). >>> >>> I'm fine to change it to return an error code. >> Agree, if add a error code for acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(), it looks more pretty. >> >> However, this function is common for other part, maybe cause any other effects if I >> do this change, did you think so? > I'm thinking what the callers are going to do with the error code. > Basically it means that we were not able to attach and configure ACPI > event GPIOs. It does not prevent GPIO drivers from functioning so they > probably just print out some warning message and continue probing, and > we already warn in acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() if something fails. > > Unless Linus W insists, let's just keep it as is for now :) Fine to me, thanks:). > . >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 6:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-04-06 7:07 [PATCH v7 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button qiujiang 2016-04-06 7:07 ` qiujiang 2016-04-06 7:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] gpio: dwapb: remove name from dwapb_port_property qiujiang 2016-04-06 7:07 ` qiujiang 2016-04-06 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko 2016-04-07 11:45 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-07 11:45 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-06 7:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode qiujiang 2016-04-06 7:07 ` qiujiang 2016-04-06 13:01 ` Andy Shevchenko 2016-04-07 11:14 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-07 11:14 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-15 2:29 ` Kefeng Wang 2016-04-15 2:29 ` Kefeng Wang 2016-04-06 7:08 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support qiujiang 2016-04-06 7:08 ` qiujiang 2016-04-08 8:26 ` Linus Walleij 2016-04-08 8:38 ` Mika Westerberg 2016-04-11 12:43 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-11 12:43 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-12 6:46 ` Mika Westerberg 2016-04-12 6:55 ` Jiang Qiu [this message] 2016-04-12 6:55 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-15 7:40 ` Linus Walleij 2016-04-15 7:58 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-15 7:58 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-11 13:00 ` Linus Walleij 2016-04-11 12:33 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-11 12:33 ` Jiang Qiu 2016-04-06 13:03 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=570C9BF8.7070400@huawei.com \ --to=qiujiang@huawei.com \ --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \ --cc=charles.chenxin@huawei.com \ --cc=delicious.quinoa@gmail.com \ --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \ --cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \ --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.