All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com" 
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	"hsinyi@google.com" <hsinyi@google.com>,
	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] r8152: stop submitting rx for -EPROTO
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 03:26:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f56b21575dd4f64a3b46aac21151667@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3694347f29ed431e9f8f2c065b8df0a7@realtek.com>

> Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> [...]
> > There has been some discussion about this in the past.
> >
> > In general, -EPROTO is almost always a non-recoverable error.
> 
> Excuse me. I am confused about the above description.
> I got -EPROTO before, when I debugged another issue.
> However, the bulk transfer still worked after I resubmitted
> the transfer. I didn't do anything to recover it. That is why
> I do resubmission for -EPROTO.

I check the Linux driver and the xHCI spec.
The driver gets -EPROTO for bulk transfer, when the host
returns COMP_USB_TRANSACTION_ERROR.
According to the spec of xHCI, USB TRANSACTION ERROR
means the host did not receive a valid response from the
device (Timeout, CRC, Bad PID, unexpected NYET, etc.).
It seems to be reasonable why resubmission sometimes works.

Best Regards,
Hayes



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com"
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	"hsinyi@google.com" <hsinyi@google.com>,
	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] r8152: stop submitting rx for -EPROTO
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 03:26:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f56b21575dd4f64a3b46aac21151667@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3694347f29ed431e9f8f2c065b8df0a7@realtek.com>

> Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> [...]
> > There has been some discussion about this in the past.
> >
> > In general, -EPROTO is almost always a non-recoverable error.
> 
> Excuse me. I am confused about the above description.
> I got -EPROTO before, when I debugged another issue.
> However, the bulk transfer still worked after I resubmitted
> the transfer. I didn't do anything to recover it. That is why
> I do resubmission for -EPROTO.

I check the Linux driver and the xHCI spec.
The driver gets -EPROTO for bulk transfer, when the host
returns COMP_USB_TRANSACTION_ERROR.
According to the spec of xHCI, USB TRANSACTION ERROR
means the host did not receive a valid response from the
device (Timeout, CRC, Bad PID, unexpected NYET, etc.).
It seems to be reasonable why resubmission sometimes works.

Best Regards,
Hayes



_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@mediatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com"
	<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	"hsinyi@google.com" <hsinyi@google.com>,
	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] r8152: stop submitting rx for -EPROTO
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 03:26:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f56b21575dd4f64a3b46aac21151667@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3694347f29ed431e9f8f2c065b8df0a7@realtek.com>

> Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> [...]
> > There has been some discussion about this in the past.
> >
> > In general, -EPROTO is almost always a non-recoverable error.
> 
> Excuse me. I am confused about the above description.
> I got -EPROTO before, when I debugged another issue.
> However, the bulk transfer still worked after I resubmitted
> the transfer. I didn't do anything to recover it. That is why
> I do resubmission for -EPROTO.

I check the Linux driver and the xHCI spec.
The driver gets -EPROTO for bulk transfer, when the host
returns COMP_USB_TRANSACTION_ERROR.
According to the spec of xHCI, USB TRANSACTION ERROR
means the host did not receive a valid response from the
device (Timeout, CRC, Bad PID, unexpected NYET, etc.).
It seems to be reasonable why resubmission sometimes works.

Best Regards,
Hayes



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29  5:18 [PATCH] r8152: stop submitting rx for -EPROTO Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-29  5:18 ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-29  5:18 ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-29  8:14 ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-29  8:14   ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-29  8:14   ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-29  9:52   ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-29  9:52     ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-29  9:52     ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-30  2:41     ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-30  2:41       ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-30  2:41       ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-01  1:36       ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-10-01  1:36         ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-10-01  1:36         ` Jason-ch Chen
2021-09-30  9:30     ` Oliver Neukum
2021-09-30  9:30       ` Oliver Neukum
2021-09-30  9:30       ` Oliver Neukum
2021-09-30 15:18       ` Alan Stern
2021-09-30 15:18         ` Alan Stern
2021-09-30 15:18         ` Alan Stern
2021-10-01  2:40         ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-01  2:40           ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-01  2:40           ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-01  3:26           ` Hayes Wang [this message]
2021-10-01  3:26             ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-01  3:26             ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-01 15:22             ` Alan Stern
2021-10-01 15:22               ` Alan Stern
2021-10-01 15:22               ` Alan Stern
2021-10-04  2:15               ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-04  2:15                 ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-04  2:15                 ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-04 11:44               ` Oliver Neukum
2021-10-04 11:44                 ` Oliver Neukum
2021-10-04 11:44                 ` Oliver Neukum
2021-10-04 14:33                 ` Alan Stern
2021-10-04 14:33                   ` Alan Stern
2021-10-04 14:33                   ` Alan Stern
2021-09-30 16:13       ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-30 16:13         ` Hayes Wang
2021-09-30 16:13         ` Hayes Wang
2021-10-04  6:28 ` [PATCH net] r8152: avoid to resubmit rx immediately Hayes Wang
2021-10-05 11:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f56b21575dd4f64a3b46aac21151667@realtek.com \
    --to=hayeswang@realtek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=hsinyi@google.com \
    --cc=jason-ch.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.