All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Jonas Aaberg <jonas.aberg@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:10:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimG+DQ3yE6hMiTSHGC6VFQ6Nkq4oA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikc7B5J0Z_aiS5kXCxMSxcFrfSRxw@mail.gmail.com>

2011/4/28 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
> 2011/4/27 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:
>> # NOTE: platform-specific GPIO drivers don't belong in the
>> # drivers/gpio directory; put them with other platform setup
>> # code, IRQ controllers, board init, etc.
>
> Yeah, you're right. I can take these comments out, simply.
> I'll review the files as bit to make sure there aren't any more
> statements like that.

Thinking of this, the pl061.c driver is already no expansion
chip (it's SoC silicon) so this statement has been wrong for
some time already.

Linus Walleij

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:10:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimG+DQ3yE6hMiTSHGC6VFQ6Nkq4oA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikc7B5J0Z_aiS5kXCxMSxcFrfSRxw@mail.gmail.com>

2011/4/28 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
> 2011/4/27 H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>:
>> # NOTE: platform-specific GPIO drivers don't belong in the
>> # drivers/gpio directory; put them with other platform setup
>> # code, IRQ controllers, board init, etc.
>
> Yeah, you're right. I can take these comments out, simply.
> I'll review the files as bit to make sure there aren't any more
> statements like that.

Thinking of this, the pl061.c driver is already no expansion
chip (it's SoC silicon) so this statement has been wrong for
some time already.

Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-28  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-27 13:13 [PATCH 02/10] mach-u300: rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio Linus Walleij
2011-04-27 13:13 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-27 18:23 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-04-27 18:23   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-04-28  7:07   ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-28  7:07     ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-28  7:10     ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2011-04-28  7:10       ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-28 17:41     ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-04-28 17:41       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-13 14:51       ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-13 14:51         ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19  8:56 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19  8:56   ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 12:21   ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 12:21     ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 13:56     ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 13:56       ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 19:11       ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 19:11         ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 19:30         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 19:30           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-20  3:18           ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-20  3:18             ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-20  3:43             ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-20  3:43               ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-20  3:54               ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-20  3:54                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-19 21:18         ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-19 21:18           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-20  1:50           ` Jamie Iles
2011-05-20  1:50             ` Jamie Iles
2011-05-20 22:07             ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-20 22:07               ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-05-21 13:03               ` Jamie Iles
2011-05-21 13:03                 ` Jamie Iles
2011-05-20  7:01         ` Grant Likely
2011-05-20  7:01           ` Grant Likely
2011-05-20  7:47           ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-20  7:47             ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 11:11 ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 11:38   ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 11:38     ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 12:25     ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 12:25       ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 12:35       ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 12:35         ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 13:17         ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 13:17           ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19 14:05           ` Barry Song
2011-05-19 14:05             ` Barry Song
2011-05-20  6:58             ` Grant Likely
2011-05-20  6:58               ` Grant Likely
2011-05-20  6:52       ` Grant Likely
2011-05-20  6:52         ` Grant Likely
2011-05-20  7:46         ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-20  7:46           ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTimG+DQ3yE6hMiTSHGC6VFQ6Nkq4oA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
    --cc=jonas.aberg@stericsson.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.