All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
	linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Glexiner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:29:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSxxEXF5knSDXsq=dTkZjtw_Qr1voo0A3qqW+KN8LKcMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180712161538.0737ba7f@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:17:01 -0700
>> So then, we should use the regular variant for this additional check you're
>> suggesting.
>
> OK, I thought we had a rcu_dereference_notrace() that did checks and
> thought that this followed suit, but it appears there is no such call.
> That's where my confusion was.
>
> Sure, I'll nuke the notrace() portion, thanks.
>
> Also, I've applied 1-3, since 4 and 5 looks to be getting a remake, I'm
> going to remove them from my queue. Please fold the SPDX patch into 5.

Will do, and send out the 4 and 5 shortly with the SPDK folded.

Also the kselftest patches were acked and can be taken independently,
I had reposted them as a separate 2 patch series with some minor
changes based on your suggestions. Could you check them?

thanks!

- Joel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joel at joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes)
Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:29:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSxxEXF5knSDXsq=dTkZjtw_Qr1voo0A3qqW+KN8LKcMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180712161538.0737ba7f@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:17:01 -0700
>> So then, we should use the regular variant for this additional check you're
>> suggesting.
>
> OK, I thought we had a rcu_dereference_notrace() that did checks and
> thought that this followed suit, but it appears there is no such call.
> That's where my confusion was.
>
> Sure, I'll nuke the notrace() portion, thanks.
>
> Also, I've applied 1-3, since 4 and 5 looks to be getting a remake, I'm
> going to remove them from my queue. Please fold the SPDX patch into 5.

Will do, and send out the 4 and 5 shortly with the SPDK folded.

Also the kselftest patches were acked and can be taken independently,
I had reposted them as a separate 2 patch series with some minor
changes based on your suggestions. Could you check them?

thanks!

- Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joel@joelfernandes.org (Joel Fernandes)
Subject: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:29:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSxxEXF5knSDXsq=dTkZjtw_Qr1voo0A3qqW+KN8LKcMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180712202932.e7yUDR_O2lr-pcK2R4MnsCfOUzhjKhoLHLC1wqsa914@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180712161538.0737ba7f@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018@1:15 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:17:01 -0700
>> So then, we should use the regular variant for this additional check you're
>> suggesting.
>
> OK, I thought we had a rcu_dereference_notrace() that did checks and
> thought that this followed suit, but it appears there is no such call.
> That's where my confusion was.
>
> Sure, I'll nuke the notrace() portion, thanks.
>
> Also, I've applied 1-3, since 4 and 5 looks to be getting a remake, I'm
> going to remove them from my queue. Please fold the SPDX patch into 5.

Will do, and send out the 4 and 5 shortly with the SPDK folded.

Also the kselftest patches were acked and can be taken independently,
I had reposted them as a separate 2 patch series with some minor
changes based on your suggestions. Could you check them?

thanks!

- Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-12 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-28 18:21 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] srcu: Add notrace variants of srcu_read_{lock,unlock} Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] srcu: Add notrace variant of srcu_dereference Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] trace/irqsoff: Split reset into separate functions Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-11 12:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:49     ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:00       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:00       ` rostedt
2018-07-11 14:27       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 14:27         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 14:27         ` paulmck
2018-07-11 14:46         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 14:46           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 14:46           ` rostedt
2018-07-11 15:15           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 15:15             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 15:15             ` paulmck
2018-07-11 20:56             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:56               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:56               ` joel
2018-07-12  1:22               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:22                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:22                 ` rostedt
2018-07-12  2:35                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:35                   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:35                   ` joel
2018-07-11 20:52           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:52             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:52             ` joel
2018-07-12  3:21             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  3:21               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  3:21               ` rostedt
2018-07-12  4:28               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  4:28                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  4:28                 ` joel
2018-07-12 13:35                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:35                   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:35                   ` rostedt
2018-07-12 19:17                   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 19:17                     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 19:17                     ` joel
2018-07-12 20:15                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:15                       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:15                       ` rostedt
2018-07-12 20:29                       ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2018-07-12 20:29                         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:29                         ` joel
2018-07-12 20:31                         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:31                           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:31                           ` rostedt
2018-07-11 12:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:53     ` peterz
2018-07-12  2:32     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:32       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  2:32       ` joel
2018-07-11 12:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 12:56     ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:06       ` rostedt
2018-07-11 15:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 15:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 15:17         ` peterz
2018-07-11 15:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:26           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:26           ` rostedt
2018-07-11 16:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:46             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:46             ` mathieu.desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40           ` mathieu.desnoyers
2018-07-12  0:31       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:31         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:31         ` joel
2018-07-12  1:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:26           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  1:26           ` rostedt
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-06 22:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-06 22:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-06 22:06     ` rostedt
2018-07-07  4:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-07  4:20       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-07  4:20       ` joel
2018-07-10 14:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 14:20     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 14:20     ` rostedt
2018-07-10 17:33     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-10 17:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-10 17:33       ` joel
2018-07-11 13:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:12     ` peterz
2018-07-11 13:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:19       ` rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22         ` rostedt
2018-07-12  8:38       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  8:38         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  8:38         ` joel
2018-07-12 13:37         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:37           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 13:37           ` rostedt
2018-07-12  0:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:44       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  0:44       ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-11  0:47   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:47     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:47     ` rostedt
2018-07-11  5:26     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:26       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:26       ` joel
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21   ` joel
2018-07-11  0:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:49     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  0:49     ` rostedt
2018-07-11  5:27     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:27       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  5:27       ` joel
2018-07-03 14:15 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:15   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:15   ` joel
2018-07-03 14:23   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-03 14:23     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-03 14:23     ` rostedt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-21 22:32 Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32   ` joel
2018-06-07 20:38 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38   ` joelaf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEXW_YSxxEXF5knSDXsq=dTkZjtw_Qr1voo0A3qqW+KN8LKcMQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=julia@ni.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.