All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:30:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2qgTyFcPdnNfkpj@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014201354.3190007-3-ndesaulniers@google.com>

Hi Russell,

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:13:52PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Similar to commit a6c30873ee4a ("ARM: 8989/1: use .fpu assembler
> directives instead of assembler arguments").
> 
> GCC and GNU binutils support setting the "sub arch" via -march=,
> -Wa,-march, target function attribute, and .arch assembler directive.
> 
> Clang was missing support for -Wa,-march=, but this was implemented in
> clang-13.
> 
> The behavior of both GCC and Clang is to
> prefer -Wa,-march= over -march= for assembler and assembler-with-cpp
> sources, but Clang will warn about the -march= being unused.
> 
> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-march=armv6k'
> [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
> 
> Since most assembler is non-conditionally assembled with one sub arch
> (modulo arch/arm/delay-loop.S which conditionally is assembled as armv4
> based on CONFIG_ARCH_RPC, and arch/arm/mach-at91/pm-suspend.S which is
> conditionally assembled as armv7-a based on CONFIG_CPU_V7), prefer the
> .arch assembler directive.
> 
> Add a few more instances found in compile testing as found by Arnd and
> Nathan.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d51c699b9e2ebc5bcfdbe85c74cc871426333d4
> Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48894
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1195
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1315
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> ---
> Changes v3 -> v4:
> * Add .arch armv7-a to arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep.S as per Nathan.
>   https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1315#issuecomment-1255646893
> * Add Nathan's SB tag.

I noticed that this series appears to be partially applied in
next-20221108:

59247fe730db ARM: 9265/1: pass -march= only to compiler
bc21212c5564 ARM: 9264/1: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler
5aa4860eb50f ARM: 9262/1: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile

This patch (submitted as 9263/1) is needed by 9265/1; without it, builds
are going to break:

https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2HGSpQMAKxJuaMAz2ZZc1UgUvvu/build.log

Was there a problem with applying this patch or just an oversight? It
would be great to get this whole series applied so that we can turn
-Wunused-command-line-argument into a hard error.

Cheers,
Nathan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:30:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2qgTyFcPdnNfkpj@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014201354.3190007-3-ndesaulniers@google.com>

Hi Russell,

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:13:52PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Similar to commit a6c30873ee4a ("ARM: 8989/1: use .fpu assembler
> directives instead of assembler arguments").
> 
> GCC and GNU binutils support setting the "sub arch" via -march=,
> -Wa,-march, target function attribute, and .arch assembler directive.
> 
> Clang was missing support for -Wa,-march=, but this was implemented in
> clang-13.
> 
> The behavior of both GCC and Clang is to
> prefer -Wa,-march= over -march= for assembler and assembler-with-cpp
> sources, but Clang will warn about the -march= being unused.
> 
> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-march=armv6k'
> [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
> 
> Since most assembler is non-conditionally assembled with one sub arch
> (modulo arch/arm/delay-loop.S which conditionally is assembled as armv4
> based on CONFIG_ARCH_RPC, and arch/arm/mach-at91/pm-suspend.S which is
> conditionally assembled as armv7-a based on CONFIG_CPU_V7), prefer the
> .arch assembler directive.
> 
> Add a few more instances found in compile testing as found by Arnd and
> Nathan.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d51c699b9e2ebc5bcfdbe85c74cc871426333d4
> Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48894
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1195
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1315
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> ---
> Changes v3 -> v4:
> * Add .arch armv7-a to arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep.S as per Nathan.
>   https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1315#issuecomment-1255646893
> * Add Nathan's SB tag.

I noticed that this series appears to be partially applied in
next-20221108:

59247fe730db ARM: 9265/1: pass -march= only to compiler
bc21212c5564 ARM: 9264/1: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler
5aa4860eb50f ARM: 9262/1: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile

This patch (submitted as 9263/1) is needed by 9265/1; without it, builds
are going to break:

https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2HGSpQMAKxJuaMAz2ZZc1UgUvvu/build.log

Was there a problem with applying this patch or just an oversight? It
would be great to get this whole series applied so that we can turn
-Wunused-command-line-argument into a hard error.

Cheers,
Nathan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14 20:13 [PATCH v4 0/4] pass -march= only to compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13   ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:18   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:18     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13   ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:19   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:19     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:30   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-11-08 18:30     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:37     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-08 18:37       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-08 18:40       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:40         ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13   ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:20   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:20     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: pass -march= only to compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13   ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:21   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 21:21     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:16   ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2qgTyFcPdnNfkpj@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.