All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>, Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dougall <dougallj@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] irqchip/apple-aic: Add cpumasks for E and P cores
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:08:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yaed7VAlwwCBcP13@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201134909.390490-4-maz@kernel.org>

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:49:04PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to be able to tell the core IRQ code about the affinity
> of the PMU interrupt in later patches, compute the cpumasks of the
> P and E cores at boot time.
> 
> This relies on the affinity scheme used by the vendor, which seems
> to work for the couple of SoCs that are out in the wild.

... but may change at any arbitrary point in future?

Can we please put the affinity in the DT, like we do for other SoCs and
devices?

I don't think we should treat this HW specially in this regard; we certaintly
don't want other folk hard-coding system topology in their irqchip driver, and
it should be possible to do something like the ppi-partitions binding, no?

Thanks,
Mark.

> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> index 3759dc36cc8f..30ca80ccda8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ struct aic_irq_chip {
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	struct irq_domain *hw_domain;
>  	struct irq_domain *ipi_domain;
> +	struct cpumask ecore_mask;
> +	struct cpumask pcore_mask;
>  	int nr_hw;
>  	int ipi_hwirq;
>  };
> @@ -200,6 +202,11 @@ static void aic_ic_write(struct aic_irq_chip *ic, u32 reg, u32 val)
>  	writel_relaxed(val, ic->base + reg);
>  }
>  
> +static bool __is_pcore(u64 mpidr)
> +{
> +	return MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) == 1;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * IRQ irqchip
>   */
> @@ -833,6 +840,13 @@ static int __init aic_of_ic_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *p
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		if (__is_pcore(cpu_logical_map(i)))
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &irqc->pcore_mask);
> +		else
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &irqc->ecore_mask);
> +	}
> +
>  	set_handle_irq(aic_handle_irq);
>  	set_handle_fiq(aic_handle_fiq);
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>, Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dougall <dougallj@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] irqchip/apple-aic: Add cpumasks for E and P cores
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:08:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yaed7VAlwwCBcP13@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201134909.390490-4-maz@kernel.org>

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:49:04PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> In order to be able to tell the core IRQ code about the affinity
> of the PMU interrupt in later patches, compute the cpumasks of the
> P and E cores at boot time.
> 
> This relies on the affinity scheme used by the vendor, which seems
> to work for the couple of SoCs that are out in the wild.

... but may change at any arbitrary point in future?

Can we please put the affinity in the DT, like we do for other SoCs and
devices?

I don't think we should treat this HW specially in this regard; we certaintly
don't want other folk hard-coding system topology in their irqchip driver, and
it should be possible to do something like the ppi-partitions binding, no?

Thanks,
Mark.

> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> index 3759dc36cc8f..30ca80ccda8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-apple-aic.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ struct aic_irq_chip {
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	struct irq_domain *hw_domain;
>  	struct irq_domain *ipi_domain;
> +	struct cpumask ecore_mask;
> +	struct cpumask pcore_mask;
>  	int nr_hw;
>  	int ipi_hwirq;
>  };
> @@ -200,6 +202,11 @@ static void aic_ic_write(struct aic_irq_chip *ic, u32 reg, u32 val)
>  	writel_relaxed(val, ic->base + reg);
>  }
>  
> +static bool __is_pcore(u64 mpidr)
> +{
> +	return MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) == 1;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * IRQ irqchip
>   */
> @@ -833,6 +840,13 @@ static int __init aic_of_ic_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *p
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		if (__is_pcore(cpu_logical_map(i)))
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &irqc->pcore_mask);
> +		else
> +			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &irqc->ecore_mask);
> +	}
> +
>  	set_handle_irq(aic_handle_irq);
>  	set_handle_fiq(aic_handle_fiq);
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-01 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-01 13:49 [PATCH v2 0/8] drivers/perf: CPU PMU driver for Apple M1 Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: arm-pmu: Document Apple PMU compatible strings Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:27   ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:27     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: apple,aic: Add CPU PMU per-cpu pseudo-interrupts Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: apple, aic: " Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:26   ` [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: apple,aic: " Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:26     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] irqchip/apple-aic: Add cpumasks for E and P cores Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 16:08   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-12-01 16:08     ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-03 16:32     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-03 16:32       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:22       ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:22         ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:30   ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:30     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-13 14:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-13 14:43       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] irqchip/apple-aic: Wire PMU interrupts Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:25   ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:25     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] irqchip/apple-aic: Move PMU-specific registers to their own include file Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:23   ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:23     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: apple: t8301: Add PMU nodes Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:26   ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:26     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: Handle 47 bit counters Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-12  7:26   ` Hector Martin
2021-12-12  7:26     ` Hector Martin
2021-12-01 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drivers/perf: Add Apple icestorm/firestorm CPU PMU driver Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-01 16:58   ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-01 16:58     ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-01 17:56     ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-12-01 17:56       ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2021-12-02 15:39     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-02 15:39       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-02 16:14       ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-02 16:14         ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-03 11:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-03 11:22           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-03 12:04           ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-03 12:04             ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-03 16:22             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-03 16:22               ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yaed7VAlwwCBcP13@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dougallj@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcan@marcan.st \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sven@svenpeter.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.