All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [virtio-comment] [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
@ 2020-10-23  6:51 Jie Deng
  2020-10-23 16:00 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Deng @ 2020-10-23  6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: virtio-comment, virtio-dev; +Cc: mst, Jie Deng

virtio-i2c is a virtual I2C adapter device. It provides a way
to flexibly communicate with the I2C slave devices from the guest.

This patch adds the specification for this device.

Signed-off-by: Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>
---
 conformance.tex | 28 +++++++++++++++---
 content.tex     |  1 +
 virtio-i2c.tex  | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 virtio-i2c.tex

diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex
index f1f23a8..12bce3a 100644
--- a/conformance.tex
+++ b/conformance.tex
@@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
 \ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Socket Driver Conformance},
 \ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / RPMB Driver Conformance},
 \ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / IOMMU Driver Conformance},
-\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Sound Driver Conformance} or
-\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Memory Driver Conformance}.
+\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Sound Driver Conformance}
+\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Memory Driver Conformance} or
+\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / I2C Adapter Driver Conformance}.
+
     \item Clause \ref{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}.
   \end{itemize}
 \item[Device] A device MUST conform to four conformance clauses:
@@ -47,8 +49,10 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
 \ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Socket Device Conformance}, 
 \ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / RPMB Device Conformance},
 \ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / IOMMU Device Conformance},
-\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Sound Device Conformance} or
-\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Memory Device Conformance}.
+\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Sound Device Conformance}
+\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Memory Device Conformance} or
+\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / I2C Adapter Device Conformance}.
+
     \item Clause \ref{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}.
   \end{itemize}
 \end{description}
@@ -261,6 +265,14 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
 \item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation / STATE request}
 \end{itemize}
 
+\conformance{\subsection}{I2C Adapter Driver Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / I2C Adapter Driver Conformance}
+
+An I2C Adapter driver MUST conform to the following normative statements:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
+\end{itemize}
+
 \conformance{\section}{Device Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance}
 
 A device MUST conform to the following normative statements:
@@ -477,6 +489,14 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
 \item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation / STATE request}
 \end{itemize}
 
+\conformance{\subsection}{I2C Adapter Device Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / I2C Adapter Device Conformance}
+
+An I2C Adapter device MUST conform to the following normative statements:
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
+\end{itemize}
+
 \conformance{\section}{Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}
 A conformant implementation MUST be either transitional or
 non-transitional, see \ref{intro:Legacy
diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
index 91855b4..95e2ed8 100644
--- a/content.tex
+++ b/content.tex
@@ -6200,6 +6200,7 @@ \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}\label{sec:Device
 \input{virtio-iommu.tex}
 \input{virtio-sound.tex}
 \input{virtio-mem.tex}
+\input{virtio-i2c.tex}
 
 \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
 
diff --git a/virtio-i2c.tex b/virtio-i2c.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..379f683
--- /dev/null
+++ b/virtio-i2c.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+\section{I2C Adapter Device}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device}
+
+virtio-i2c is a virtual I2C adapter device. It provides a way to flexibly
+organize and manage I2C slave devices from the guest. By attaching ACPI
+I2C slave nodes to the virtual I2C adapter device, the guest can
+communicate with them without changing or adding extra drivers for these
+slave I2C devices. 
+
+\subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device ID}
+34
+
+\subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Virtqueues}
+
+\begin{description}
+\item[0] requestq
+\end{description}
+
+\subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Feature bits}
+
+None currently defined.
+
+\subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device configuration layout}
+
+None currently defined.
+
+\subsection{Device Initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Initialization}
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item The virtqueue is initialized.
+\end{enumerate}
+
+\subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
+
+The driver queues requests to the virtqueues, and they are used by the
+device. The request is the representation of one segment of an I2C
+transaction. Each request is of form:
+
+\begin{lstlisting}
+struct virtio_i2c_req {
+        le16 addr;
+        le16 flags;
+        le16 len;
+        u8 buf[];
+        u8 status;
+};
+\end{lstlisting}
+
+The \field{addr} is the address of the I2C slave device.
+
+The first bit of \field{flags} indicates whether it is a read or write request.
+It means a read request if the first bit of \field{flags} is set, otherwise
+it is a write request. The rest bits of \field{flags} are reserved.
+
+The \field{len} is the number of data bytes in the \field{buf} being read from or
+written to the I2C slave address.
+
+The \field{buf} of the request contains one segment of an I2C transaction.
+If the first bit of \field{flags} is '1', the \field{buf} is written by the
+device and it contains one segment of an I2C transaction being read from the
+device. If the first bit of \field{flags} is '0', the \field{buf} is written
+by the driver and it contains one segment of an I2C transaction being written
+to the the device.
+
+The final \field{status} byte is written by the device: either VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK
+for success or VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR for error.
+
+\begin{lstlisting}
+#define VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK     0
+#define VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR    1
+\end{lstlisting}
+
+\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
+
+A driver MUST set \field{addr}, \field{flags} and \field{len} before sending
+the request.
+
+A driver MUST place one segment of an I2C transaction into \field{buf} if the
+first bit of \field{flags} is '0'.
+
+A driver MUST NOT use \field{addr}, \field{flags}, \field{len} and \field{buf}
+if the final \field{status} returned from the device is VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR.
+
+\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
+
+A device MUST NOT change the value of \field{addr}, \field{flags} and \field{len}.
+
+A device MUST place one segment of an I2C transaction into \field{buf} if the first
+bit of \field{flags} is '1'.
-- 
2.7.4


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-10-23  6:51 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification Jie Deng
@ 2020-10-23 16:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2020-10-26  1:22   ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Jie Deng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-10-23 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jie Deng; +Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 02:51:25PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> virtio-i2c is a virtual I2C adapter device. It provides a way
> to flexibly communicate with the I2C slave devices from the guest.
> 
> This patch adds the specification for this device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>
> ---
>  conformance.tex | 28 +++++++++++++++---
>  content.tex     |  1 +
>  virtio-i2c.tex  | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 virtio-i2c.tex
> 
> diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex
> index f1f23a8..12bce3a 100644
> --- a/conformance.tex
> +++ b/conformance.tex
> @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
>  \ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Socket Driver Conformance},
>  \ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / RPMB Driver Conformance},
>  \ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / IOMMU Driver Conformance},
> -\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Sound Driver Conformance} or
> -\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Memory Driver Conformance}.
> +\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Sound Driver Conformance}
> +\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Memory Driver Conformance} or
> +\ref{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / I2C Adapter Driver Conformance}.
> +
>      \item Clause \ref{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}.
>    \end{itemize}
>  \item[Device] A device MUST conform to four conformance clauses:
> @@ -47,8 +49,10 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
>  \ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Socket Device Conformance}, 
>  \ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / RPMB Device Conformance},
>  \ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / IOMMU Device Conformance},
> -\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Sound Device Conformance} or
> -\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Memory Device Conformance}.
> +\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Sound Device Conformance}
> +\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Memory Device Conformance} or
> +\ref{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / I2C Adapter Device Conformance}.
> +
>      \item Clause \ref{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}.
>    \end{itemize}
>  \end{description}
> @@ -261,6 +265,14 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
>  \item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation / STATE request}
>  \end{itemize}
>  
> +\conformance{\subsection}{I2C Adapter Driver Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / I2C Adapter Driver Conformance}
> +
> +An I2C Adapter driver MUST conform to the following normative statements:
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> +\end{itemize}
> +
>  \conformance{\section}{Device Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance}
>  
>  A device MUST conform to the following normative statements:
> @@ -477,6 +489,14 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets}
>  \item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / Memory Device / Device Operation / STATE request}
>  \end{itemize}
>  
> +\conformance{\subsection}{I2C Adapter Device Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / I2C Adapter Device Conformance}
> +
> +An I2C Adapter device MUST conform to the following normative statements:
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> +\end{itemize}
> +
>  \conformance{\section}{Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}
>  A conformant implementation MUST be either transitional or
>  non-transitional, see \ref{intro:Legacy
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 91855b4..95e2ed8 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -6200,6 +6200,7 @@ \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}\label{sec:Device
>  \input{virtio-iommu.tex}
>  \input{virtio-sound.tex}
>  \input{virtio-mem.tex}
> +\input{virtio-i2c.tex}
>  
>  \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
>  
> diff --git a/virtio-i2c.tex b/virtio-i2c.tex
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..379f683
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/virtio-i2c.tex
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +\section{I2C Adapter Device}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device}
> +
> +virtio-i2c is a virtual I2C adapter device. It provides a way to flexibly
> +organize and manage I2C slave devices from the guest. By attaching ACPI
> +I2C slave nodes to the virtual I2C adapter device, the guest can
> +communicate with them without changing or adding extra drivers for these
> +slave I2C devices. 
> +
> +\subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device ID}
> +34
> +
> +\subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Virtqueues}
> +
> +\begin{description}
> +\item[0] requestq
> +\end{description}
> +
> +\subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Feature bits}
> +
> +None currently defined.
> +
> +\subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device configuration layout}
> +
> +None currently defined.
> +
> +\subsection{Device Initialization}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Initialization}
> +
> +\begin{enumerate}
> +\item The virtqueue is initialized.
> +\end{enumerate}
> +
> +\subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> +
> +The driver queues requests to the virtqueues, and they are used by the
> +device. The request is the representation of one segment of an I2C
> +transaction. Each request is of form:
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +struct virtio_i2c_req {
> +        le16 addr;
> +        le16 flags;
> +        le16 len;
> +        u8 buf[];
> +        u8 status;
> +};
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +The \field{addr} is the address of the I2C slave device.
> +
> +The first bit of \field{flags} indicates whether it is a read or write request.
> +It means a read request if the first bit of \field{flags} is set, otherwise
> +it is a write request. The rest bits of \field{flags} are reserved.
>


So how does one creates a multi-segment transaction then?


> +The \field{len} is the number of data bytes in the \field{buf} being read from or
> +written to the I2C slave address.
> +
> +The \field{buf} of the request contains one segment of an I2C transaction.
> +If the first bit of \field{flags} is '1', the \field{buf} is written by the
> +device and it contains one segment of an I2C transaction being read from the
> +device. If the first bit of \field{flags} is '0', the \field{buf} is written
> +by the driver and it contains one segment of an I2C transaction being written
> +to the the device.
> +
> +The final \field{status} byte is written by the device: either VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK
> +for success or VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR for error.
> +
> +\begin{lstlisting}
> +#define VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK     0
> +#define VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR    1
> +\end{lstlisting}
> +
> +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> +
> +A driver MUST set \field{addr}, \field{flags} and \field{len} before sending
> +the request.
> +
> +A driver MUST place one segment of an I2C transaction into \field{buf} if the
> +first bit of \field{flags} is '0'.
> +
> +A driver MUST NOT use \field{addr}, \field{flags}, \field{len} and \field{buf}
> +if the final \field{status} returned from the device is VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR.
> +
> +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types / I2C Adapter Device / Device Operation}
> +
> +A device MUST NOT change the value of \field{addr}, \field{flags} and \field{len}.
> +
> +A device MUST place one segment of an I2C transaction into \field{buf} if the first
> +bit of \field{flags} is '1'.
> -- 
> 2.7.4


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-10-23 16:00 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2020-10-26  1:22   ` Jie Deng
  2020-10-26  8:08     ` [virtio-comment] " Jie Deng
  2020-10-27 11:20     ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Deng @ 2020-10-26  1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev

On 2020/10/24 0:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 02:51:25PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
>> +
>> +The driver queues requests to the virtqueues, and they are used by the
>> +device. The request is the representation of one segment of an I2C
>> +transaction. Each request is of form:
>> +
>> +\begin{lstlisting}
>> +struct virtio_i2c_req {
>> +        le16 addr;
>> +        le16 flags;
>> +        le16 len;
>> +        u8 buf[];
>> +        u8 status;
>> +};
>> +\end{lstlisting}
>> +
>> +The \field{addr} is the address of the I2C slave device.
>> +
>> +The first bit of \field{flags} indicates whether it is a read or write request.
>> +It means a read request if the first bit of \field{flags} is set, otherwise
>> +it is a write request. The rest bits of \field{flags} are reserved.
>>
>
> So how does one creates a multi-segment transaction then?
>
The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep 
the segments in order.

Thanks.

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>

This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-10-26  1:22   ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Jie Deng
@ 2020-10-26  8:08     ` Jie Deng
  2020-10-27 11:20     ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Deng @ 2020-10-26  8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev

On 2020/10/26 9:22, Jie Deng wrote:

> On 2020/10/24 0:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 02:51:25PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
>>> +
>>> +The driver queues requests to the virtqueues, and they are used by the
>>> +device. The request is the representation of one segment of an I2C
>>> +transaction. Each request is of form:
>>> +
>>> +\begin{lstlisting}
>>> +struct virtio_i2c_req {
>>> +        le16 addr;
>>> +        le16 flags;
>>> +        le16 len;
>>> +        u8 buf[];
>>> +        u8 status;
>>> +};
>>> +\end{lstlisting}
>>> +
>>> +The \field{addr} is the address of the I2C slave device.
>>> +
>>> +The first bit of \field{flags} indicates whether it is a read or 
>>> write request.
>>> +It means a read request if the first bit of \field{flags} is set, 
>>> otherwise
>>> +it is a write request. The rest bits of \field{flags} are reserved.
>>>
>>
>> So how does one creates a multi-segment transaction then?
>>
> The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
> So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep 
> the segments in order.
>
> Thanks.
>
What about adding following requirement to the spec ?

"A driver MUST keep the requests in order if a multi-segment transaction 
is going to be sent."
"A device MUST guarantee the requests being handled in order if a 
multi-segment transaction is received."

Thanks.


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-10-26  1:22   ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Jie Deng
  2020-10-26  8:08     ` [virtio-comment] " Jie Deng
@ 2020-10-27 11:20     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2020-10-31 13:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2020-10-27 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jie Deng; +Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 09:22:07AM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2020/10/24 0:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 02:51:25PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > +
> > > +The driver queues requests to the virtqueues, and they are used by the
> > > +device. The request is the representation of one segment of an I2C
> > > +transaction. Each request is of form:
> > > +
> > > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > > +struct virtio_i2c_req {
> > > +        le16 addr;
> > > +        le16 flags;
> > > +        le16 len;
> > > +        u8 buf[];
> > > +        u8 status;
> > > +};
> > > +\end{lstlisting}
> > > +
> > > +The \field{addr} is the address of the I2C slave device.
> > > +
> > > +The first bit of \field{flags} indicates whether it is a read or write request.
> > > +It means a read request if the first bit of \field{flags} is set, otherwise
> > > +it is a write request. The rest bits of \field{flags} are reserved.
> > > 
> > 
> > So how does one creates a multi-segment transaction then?
> > 
> The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
> So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep the
> segments in order.
> 
> Thanks.

Fine, but I see no flags to signal start/end of such a transaction.

> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> > 


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-10-27 11:20     ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2020-10-31 13:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
  2020-11-05  6:35         ` Jie Deng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-10-31 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin, Jie Deng; +Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev

On 27/10/20 12:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
>> So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep the
>> segments in order.
>>
>> Thanks.
> Fine, but I see no flags to signal start/end of such a transaction.
> 

In theory there's no difference between one multi-segment transaction
and many single-segment transactions _in a single-master scenario_.

However, it is a plausible configuration to have multiple guests sharing
an I2C host device as if they were multiple master.

For this reason, I would prefer to have at least support for
transactions with 1 write and 1 read segment to the same address (see my
other message).

Paolo


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-10-31 13:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-11-05  6:35         ` Jie Deng
  2020-11-10  7:31           ` Jie Deng
  2020-11-10  7:51           ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Deng @ 2020-11-05  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev, stefanha, Cornelia Huck, Michael S. Tsirkin

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1128 bytes --]


On 2020/10/31 21:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 27/10/20 12:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
>>> So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep the
>>> segments in order.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>> Fine, but I see no flags to signal start/end of such a transaction.
>>
> In theory there's no difference between one multi-segment transaction
> and many single-segment transactions _in a single-master scenario_.
>
> However, it is a plausible configuration to have multiple guests sharing
> an I2C host device as if they were multiple master.
>
> For this reason, I would prefer to have at least support for
> transactions with 1 write and 1 read segment to the same address (see my
> other message).
>
> Paolo
Then how to distinguish the order of the two segments if they are in one 
request ?
We don't know this is a write followed by a read or a read followed by a 
write in this case.

However, if the request is the representation of only one segment of an 
I2C transaction,
we can simply judge by the order of the requests in the virtqueue.

Thanks


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2105 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-11-05  6:35         ` Jie Deng
@ 2020-11-10  7:31           ` Jie Deng
  2020-11-10  7:51           ` Paolo Bonzini
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jie Deng @ 2020-11-10  7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini
  Cc: virtio-comment, virtio-dev, stefanha, Cornelia Huck, Michael S. Tsirkin

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1464 bytes --]


On 2020/11/5 14:35, Jie Deng wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/10/31 21:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 27/10/20 12:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
>>>> So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep the
>>>> segments in order.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>> Fine, but I see no flags to signal start/end of such a transaction.
>>>
>> In theory there's no difference between one multi-segment transaction
>> and many single-segment transactions _in a single-master scenario_.
>>
>> However, it is a plausible configuration to have multiple guests sharing
>> an I2C host device as if they were multiple master.
>>
>> For this reason, I would prefer to have at least support for
>> transactions with 1 write and 1 read segment to the same address (see my
>> other message).
>>
>> Paolo
> Then how to distinguish the order of the two segments if they are in 
> one request ?
> We don't know this is a write followed by a read or a read followed by 
> a write in this case.
>
> However, if the request is the representation of only one segment of 
> an I2C transaction,
> we can simply judge by the order of the requests in the virtqueue.
>
> Thanks
>
I didn't see any response so I updated a v4 to have following simplest 
request for this moment.

struct virtio_i2c_req {
     le16 addr;
     le16 len;
     u8 buf[];
     u8 status;
};

Thanks.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3032 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification
  2020-11-05  6:35         ` Jie Deng
  2020-11-10  7:31           ` Jie Deng
@ 2020-11-10  7:51           ` Paolo Bonzini
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-11-10  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jie Deng
  Cc: virtio-comment, Virtio-Dev, stefanha, Cornelia Huck, Michael S. Tsirkin

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1378 bytes --]

It'd always be a write followed by a read. Usually the write provides the
number of a register to be read.

The opposite order does not make much sense.

Paolo

Il gio 5 nov 2020, 07:35 Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com> ha scritto:

>
> On 2020/10/31 21:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 27/10/20 12:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> The I2C doesn't support segments numbering and sorting.
> So if one creates a multi-segment transaction, then he/she should keep the
> segments in order.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Fine, but I see no flags to signal start/end of such a transaction.
>
>
>
> In theory there's no difference between one multi-segment transaction
> and many single-segment transactions _in a single-master scenario_.
>
> However, it is a plausible configuration to have multiple guests sharing
> an I2C host device as if they were multiple master.
>
> For this reason, I would prefer to have at least support for
> transactions with 1 write and 1 read segment to the same address (see my
> other message).
>
> Paolo
>
> Then how to distinguish the order of the two segments if they are in one
> request ?
> We don't know this is a write followed by a read or a read followed by a
> write in this case.
>
> However, if the request is the representation of only one segment of an
> I2C transaction,
> we can simply judge by the order of the requests in the virtqueue.
>
> Thanks
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2266 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-10  7:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-23  6:51 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v2] virtio-i2c: add the device specification Jie Deng
2020-10-23 16:00 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-26  1:22   ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Jie Deng
2020-10-26  8:08     ` [virtio-comment] " Jie Deng
2020-10-27 11:20     ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-31 13:58       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-05  6:35         ` Jie Deng
2020-11-10  7:31           ` Jie Deng
2020-11-10  7:51           ` Paolo Bonzini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.