All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:00:21 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101180043140.8580@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Peudk-0003SJ-Aj@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> Add additional instructions to our assembly bitops functions to ensure
> that they only operate on word-aligned pointers.  This will be necessary
> when we switch these operations to use the word-based exclusive
> operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This breaks the Thumb2 kernel build:

  AS      arch/arm/lib/changebit.o
arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:16: Error: Thumb does not support negative register indexing -- `strne r1,[r1,-r1]'

I also wonder what happens with a misaligned ldrex/strex... Does the 
alignment trap get invoked?  If so, the assertion could be put there 
instead if that's not done already, removing this overhead from bitops 
calls.  In the pre-ARMv6 case the alignment trap fixup would be applied 
as usual since the ldr/str are not special, but the previous code 
allowed for misaligned pointer so result would be no worse than before 
in that case.  Testing appears to indicate those misaligned bitops are 
rather nonexistent so far.

> ---
>  arch/arm/lib/bitops.h |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h
> index d422529..910d599 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  
>  #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 && defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K)
>  	.macro	bitop, instr
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	mov	r2, #1
>  	and	r3, r0, #7		@ Get bit offset
>  	add	r1, r1, r0, lsr #3	@ Get byte offset
> @@ -14,6 +16,8 @@
>  	.endm
>  
>  	.macro	testop, instr, store
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	and	r3, r0, #7		@ Get bit offset
>  	mov	r2, #1
>  	add	r1, r1, r0, lsr #3	@ Get byte offset
> @@ -32,6 +36,8 @@
>  	.endm
>  #else
>  	.macro	bitop, instr
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	and	r2, r0, #7
>  	mov	r3, #1
>  	mov	r3, r3, lsl r2
> @@ -52,6 +58,8 @@
>   * to avoid dirtying the data cache.
>   */
>  	.macro	testop, instr, store
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	add	r1, r1, r0, lsr #3
>  	and	r3, r0, #7
>  	mov	r0, #1
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:00:21 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101180043140.8580@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Peudk-0003SJ-Aj@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> Add additional instructions to our assembly bitops functions to ensure
> that they only operate on word-aligned pointers.  This will be necessary
> when we switch these operations to use the word-based exclusive
> operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This breaks the Thumb2 kernel build:

  AS      arch/arm/lib/changebit.o
arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:16: Error: Thumb does not support negative register indexing -- `strne r1,[r1,-r1]'

I also wonder what happens with a misaligned ldrex/strex... Does the 
alignment trap get invoked?  If so, the assertion could be put there 
instead if that's not done already, removing this overhead from bitops 
calls.  In the pre-ARMv6 case the alignment trap fixup would be applied 
as usual since the ldr/str are not special, but the previous code 
allowed for misaligned pointer so result would be no worse than before 
in that case.  Testing appears to indicate those misaligned bitops are 
rather nonexistent so far.

> ---
>  arch/arm/lib/bitops.h |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h
> index d422529..910d599 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/bitops.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  
>  #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 && defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v6K)
>  	.macro	bitop, instr
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	mov	r2, #1
>  	and	r3, r0, #7		@ Get bit offset
>  	add	r1, r1, r0, lsr #3	@ Get byte offset
> @@ -14,6 +16,8 @@
>  	.endm
>  
>  	.macro	testop, instr, store
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	and	r3, r0, #7		@ Get bit offset
>  	mov	r2, #1
>  	add	r1, r1, r0, lsr #3	@ Get byte offset
> @@ -32,6 +36,8 @@
>  	.endm
>  #else
>  	.macro	bitop, instr
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	and	r2, r0, #7
>  	mov	r3, #1
>  	mov	r3, r3, lsl r2
> @@ -52,6 +58,8 @@
>   * to avoid dirtying the data cache.
>   */
>  	.macro	testop, instr, store
> +	tst	r1, #3
> +	strne	r1, [r1, -r1]		@ assert word-aligned
>  	add	r1, r1, r0, lsr #3
>  	and	r3, r0, #7
>  	mov	r0, #1
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-18  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 254+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17 19:20 [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  6:00   ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2011-01-18  6:00     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 14:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:30       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 18:20       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 18:20         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 15:11     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-18 15:11       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-25 19:50   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 19:50     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  5:42   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  5:42     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  0:16   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  0:16     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  4:44     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  4:44       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  9:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  9:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24  8:38         ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:38           ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:57           ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:57             ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 10:28             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 10:28               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 13:47               ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 13:47                 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:11                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:11                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:54                   ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:54                     ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 15:00                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 15:00                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:11       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:11         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:19         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:19         ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$%deacon@arm.com>
2011-01-25 21:38       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 21:38         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 19:51   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 19:51     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:13   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:13     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 16:43   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:43     ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 16:59       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:33       ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:33         ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:46           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 21:21           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 21:21             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 11:11             ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 11:11               ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 12:44               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 12:44                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 17:25                 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 17:25                   ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 21:31                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 21:31                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 14:37                     ` [PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups " Dave Martin
2011-01-27 14:37                       ` Dave Martin
2011-01-27 16:46                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-27 16:46                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22                   ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:11                       ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:11                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13                           ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:46                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:46                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 18:29                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 18:29                               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 19:11                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 19:11                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11  9:33                                 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11  9:33                                   ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:13                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:13                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:52                                     ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:52                                       ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:05                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:05                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:17                                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:17                                           ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:32                                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:32                                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16 16:35                                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-16 16:35                                               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52                                               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52                                                 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 15:42               ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:42                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:52                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 15:52                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 16:59                   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 16:59                     ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 21:06                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 21:06                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 11:44                       ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-27 11:44                         ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:14   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:14     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:36   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 10:36   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 11:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 11:09       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:22         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 15:22         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: v6k: Realview EB 11MPCore and PB11MPCore use V6K architecture CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: v6k: Dove platforms " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:39   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:39     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: v6k: select clear exclusive code seqences according to V6 variants Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:15   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:15     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: v6k: select cmpxchg code sequences " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:18   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:18     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: v6k: select generic atomic64 code " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:21     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: v6k: select TLS register " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:23   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:23     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:36       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  4:27         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:27           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:25       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:25         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:21     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:21       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch < ARMv6K Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:03   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:03     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:23     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:23       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-27 18:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:14     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-27 18:59       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28  9:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28  9:46         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28  9:59         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28  9:59           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 10:46           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 10:46             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 11:06             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 11:06               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 12:25               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 12:25                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:05                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:05                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:10                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:10                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:22                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:22                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 15:11                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 15:11                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 16:49                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-28 16:49                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: v6k: do not disable CPU_32v6K based on platform selection Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:24     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: v6k: allow swp emulation again when ARMv7 is enabled Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:24     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: v6k: only allow SMP if we have v6k or v7 CPU Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:25   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:25     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:30   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:40   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:40     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:44     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:44       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 15:01       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:01         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:36   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:58     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:58       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 20:43       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-08 20:43         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09  0:35         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09  0:35           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09  6:04           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09  6:04             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09  9:48             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09  9:48               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09 10:00               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 10:00                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:24                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:24                   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:27                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:27                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:32                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:32                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:45                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 16:45                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 17:48                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 17:48                         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 10:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-09 10:01       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:04       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:04         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:12         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:12           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:16           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:16             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 20:45           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 20:45             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 21:07             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 21:07               ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1101180043140.8580@xanadu.home \
    --to=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.