* [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible [not found] <CGME20170828122625epcas2p33e3e912339c1e29051ad8e28251ea91b@epcas2p3.samsung.com> @ 2017-08-28 12:19 ` Alim Akhtar 2017-08-28 15:45 ` Bart Van Assche 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alim Akhtar @ 2017-08-28 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-scsi, linux-kernel; +Cc: JBottomley, vinholikatti, martin.petersen This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned with reset of the file. Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h index f60145d..588094a 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h @@ -186,9 +186,9 @@ enum { /* UECDL - Host UIC Error Code Data Link Layer 3Ch */ #define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR UFS_BIT(31) #define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_CODE_MASK 0x7FFF -#define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_PA_INIT 0x2000 -#define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_NAC_RECEIVED 0x0001 -#define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_TCx_REPLAY_TIMEOUT 0x0002 +#define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_PA_INIT UFS_BIT(13) +#define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_NAC_RECEIVED UFS_BIT(1) +#define UIC_DATA_LINK_LAYER_ERROR_TCx_REPLAY_TIMEOUT UFS_BIT(2) /* UECN - Host UIC Error Code Network Layer 40h */ #define UIC_NETWORK_LAYER_ERROR UFS_BIT(31) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible 2017-08-28 12:19 ` [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible Alim Akhtar @ 2017-08-28 15:45 ` Bart Van Assche 2017-08-29 11:05 ` Alim Akhtar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bart Van Assche @ 2017-08-28 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-scsi, alim.akhtar, linux-kernel Cc: martin.petersen, JBottomley, vinholikatti On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: > This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few > places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned > with reset of the file. This is the definition of the UFS_BIT() macro I found in drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h: #define UFS_BIT(x) (1L << (x)) Using this macro makes code longer instead of shorter and does not improve code readability. Is this macro really useful? Wouldn't it be better to remove the UFS_BIT() macro instead of introducing more uses of it? Thanks, Bart. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible 2017-08-28 15:45 ` Bart Van Assche @ 2017-08-29 11:05 ` Alim Akhtar 2017-09-11 2:44 ` Alim Akhtar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alim Akhtar @ 2017-08-29 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bart Van Assche, linux-scsi, linux-kernel Cc: martin.petersen, Arnd Bergmann, vinholikatti Hi Bart, Thanks for your review. On 08/28/2017 09:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few >> places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned >> with reset of the file. > > This is the definition of the UFS_BIT() macro I found in > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h: > > #define UFS_BIT(x) (1L << (x)) > > Using this macro makes code longer instead of shorter and does not improve > code readability. Is this macro really useful? Wouldn't it be better to > remove the UFS_BIT() macro instead of introducing more uses of it? > Well, the intension of this patch is to make use of already existing UFS_BIT() macro. I am not aware of the history why this macro was created at first place. Well, it does improve code readability, for me at least, no need for one to do a calculation to see which bit it is, as we pass _bit_ number to UFS_BIT. I am totally okay, if you or other reviewers suggests me to change UFS_BIT to actual bit position, something like the original case, which this patch is trying to change. > Thanks, > > Bart. > Thanks! Alim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible 2017-08-29 11:05 ` Alim Akhtar @ 2017-09-11 2:44 ` Alim Akhtar 2017-09-25 19:31 ` Martin K. Petersen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alim Akhtar @ 2017-09-11 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alim Akhtar Cc: Bart Van Assche, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, martin.petersen, Arnd Bergmann, vinholikatti Hi, Ping!!! Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() macro? On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Bart, > Thanks for your review. > > On 08/28/2017 09:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote: >>> This entire file uses UFS_BIT macro for bits definition, expect for few >>> places. This patch convert those defines to use UFS_BIT macro to be aligned >>> with reset of the file. >> >> This is the definition of the UFS_BIT() macro I found in >> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h: >> >> #define UFS_BIT(x) (1L << (x)) >> >> Using this macro makes code longer instead of shorter and does not improve >> code readability. Is this macro really useful? Wouldn't it be better to >> remove the UFS_BIT() macro instead of introducing more uses of it? >> > Well, the intension of this patch is to make use of already existing > UFS_BIT() macro. > > I am not aware of the history why this macro was created at first place. > > Well, it does improve code readability, for me at least, no need for one > to do a calculation to see which bit it is, as we pass _bit_ number to > UFS_BIT. > > I am totally okay, if you or other reviewers suggests me to change > UFS_BIT to actual bit position, something like the original case, which > this patch is trying to change. > >> Thanks, >> >> Bart. >> > Thanks! > Alim -- Regards, Alim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible 2017-09-11 2:44 ` Alim Akhtar @ 2017-09-25 19:31 ` Martin K. Petersen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2017-09-25 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alim Akhtar Cc: Alim Akhtar, Bart Van Assche, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, martin.petersen, Arnd Bergmann, vinholikatti Alim, > Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() > macro? I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes. Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible @ 2017-09-25 19:31 ` Martin K. Petersen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2017-09-25 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alim Akhtar Cc: Alim Akhtar, Bart Van Assche, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, martin.petersen, Arnd Bergmann, vinholikatti Alim, > Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() > macro? I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes. Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible 2017-09-25 19:31 ` Martin K. Petersen (?) @ 2017-09-30 6:24 ` Alim Akhtar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Alim Akhtar @ 2017-09-30 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin K. Petersen, Alim Akhtar Cc: Bart Van Assche, linux-scsi, linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, vinholikatti Hi Martin, On 09/26/2017 01:01 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Alim, > >> Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() >> macro? > > I fail to see the point of UFS_BIT(). So yes. > > Please make sure to CC: Subhash on ufs changes. > Thanks for looking into this patch. I have just posted https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/30/41 (a series of 3 patches) Please take a look. Regards, Alim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-30 6:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <CGME20170828122625epcas2p33e3e912339c1e29051ad8e28251ea91b@epcas2p3.samsung.com> 2017-08-28 12:19 ` [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make use of UFS_BIT macro wherever possible Alim Akhtar 2017-08-28 15:45 ` Bart Van Assche 2017-08-29 11:05 ` Alim Akhtar 2017-09-11 2:44 ` Alim Akhtar 2017-09-25 19:31 ` Martin K. Petersen 2017-09-25 19:31 ` Martin K. Petersen 2017-09-30 6:24 ` Alim Akhtar
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.