From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Derrick Stolee" <derrickstolee@github.com>,
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: update 'static-analysis' to Ubuntu 22.04
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:19:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqczcggqzx.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yw99GwZ/MVaK9D0b@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:24:11 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:13:51PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> Removing coccinelle rules because we're seeing slowness somewhere seems
>> particularly short-sighted to me.
>>
>> Maybe we do run into intractable problems somewhere with it being slow,
>> and we'd also like to cater to more "interactive" use.
>
> Agreed. I'm not wild about how long it takes to run either, but if it's
> producing useful results, it seems worth it to pay the CPU (and I think
> unused.cocci did find some useful results already). There's a point at
> which the CPU use becomes intractable, but I don't think we're there
> yet.
I am not, either, as it does not look like it is producing all that
useful results these days, but of course, we are looking at the end
result of previous clean-up triggered by these existing rules, and
therefore be biased---we only see cost of running the rules these
days without seeing anything new getting caught.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-23 17:28 [PATCH] ci: update 'static-analysis' to Ubuntu 22.04 Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-08-24 14:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-08-24 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-24 23:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-25 0:30 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-25 4:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-25 10:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-25 16:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] git-compat-util.h: change UNUSED(var) to UNUSED Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-compat-util.h: use "UNUSED", not "UNUSED(var)" Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-25 17:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-compat-util.h: use "deprecated" for UNUSED variables Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-26 7:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] git-compat-util.h: change UNUSED(var) to UNUSED Jeff King
2022-08-26 7:48 ` [PATCH] ci: update 'static-analysis' to Ubuntu 22.04 Jeff King
2022-08-26 16:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-27 12:58 ` Jeff King
2022-08-29 5:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-29 10:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-31 15:12 ` Jeff King
2022-08-31 8:44 ` SZEDER Gábor
2022-08-31 12:13 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-31 15:24 ` Jeff King
2022-08-31 19:19 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-08-31 18:05 ` SZEDER Gábor
2022-08-31 19:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-25 14:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-08-25 16:17 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqczcggqzx.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).