linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	ira.weiny@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] cxl/mem: Fix register block offset calculation
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:26:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210415232610.603273-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)

The offset for the register block should be a 64K aligned value, and
therefore FIELD_GET (which will shift) is not correct for the
calculation.

From 8.1.9.1 of the CXL 2.0 spec:
  A[31:16] of offset from the address contained by one of the Function's
  Base Address Registers to point to the base of the Register Block.
  Register Block Offset is 64K aligned. Hence A[15:0] is zero

Fix this by simply using a mask.

This wasn't found earlier because the primary development done in the
QEMU environment only uses 0 offsets

Fixes: 8adaf747c9f0b ("cxl/mem: Find device capabilities")
Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/mem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
index e3003f49b329..1b5078311f7d 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static struct cxl_mem *cxl_mem_create(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 reg_lo,
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK, reg_lo);
+	offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK);
 	bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo);
 
 	/* Basic sanity check that BAR is big enough */
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 23:26 Ben Widawsky [this message]
2021-04-15 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] cxl/mem: Print unknown capability IDs as hex Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:34   ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-04-15 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] cxl/mem: Demarcate vendor specific capability IDs Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:27   ` Ben Widawsky
2021-04-15 23:37     ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-04-15 23:50       ` Ben Widawsky
2021-05-19 20:01     ` Dan Williams
2021-04-16  0:29   ` Dan Williams
2021-04-16  0:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] cxl/mem: Fix register block offset calculation Dan Williams
2021-04-16  2:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Widawsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210415232610.603273-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --to=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).