From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Cc: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] md raid0/linear: Introduce new array state 'broken'
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:14:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B7287054-70AC-47A8-BA5A-4D3D7C3F689F@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c35cd395-fc54-24c0-1175-d3ea0ab0413d@canonical.com>
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 7:16 AM, Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 19/08/2019 18:57, Song Liu wrote:
>> [...]
>> How about we test this when we do clear_bit(Faulty..)? And maybe also in
>> add_new_disk()?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Song
>>
>
> Song, thanks for the suggestions. I've been working in the refactor, so
> far it's working fine. But I cannot re-add a member to raid0/linear
> without performing a full stop (with "mdadm --stop"), and in this case
> md_clean() will clear the flag. Restarting array this way works fine.
>
> If I try writing 'inactive' to array_state, I cannot reinsert the member
> to the array. That said, I don't think we need to worry in clearing
> MD_BROKEN for RAID0/LINEAR, and it makes things far easier.
> Are you ok with that? I'll submit V3 after our discussion.
>
What do you mean by "not clear MD_BROKEN"? Do you mean we need to restart
the array?
IOW, the following won't work:
mdadm --fail /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
mdadm --remove /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
And we need the following instead:
mdadm --fail /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
mdadm --remove /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
mdadm --stop /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
mdadm --run /dev/md0 /dev/sdx
Thanks,
Song
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-21 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 13:40 [PATCH v2 1/2] md raid0/linear: Introduce new array state 'broken' Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mdadm: Introduce new array state 'broken' for raid0/linear Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-19 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] md raid0/linear: Introduce new array state 'broken' Song Liu
2019-08-19 18:30 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-19 18:57 ` Song Liu
2019-08-19 19:11 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-19 21:57 ` Song Liu
2019-08-21 14:16 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-21 16:14 ` Song Liu [this message]
2019-08-21 18:06 ` Song Liu
2019-08-21 19:10 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-21 19:22 ` Song Liu
2019-08-22 16:16 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2019-08-22 8:49 ` Guoqing Jiang
2019-08-22 15:35 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B7287054-70AC-47A8-BA5A-4D3D7C3F689F@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=gpiccoli@canonical.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).