[PATCH v2 0/5] Initialise thermal framework and cpufreq earlier during boot

[PATCH v2 0/5] Initialise thermal framework and cpufreq earlier during boot

[Amit Kucheria]

Changes since v1:
- Completely get rid of netlink support in the thermal framework.
- This changes the early init patch to a single line - change to
  core_initcall. Changed authorship of patch since it is nothing like the
  original. Lina, let me know if you feel otherwise.
- I've tested to make sure that the qcom-cpufreq-hw driver continues to
  work correctly as a module so this won't impact Android's GKI plans.
- Collected Acks

Device boot needs to be as fast as possible while keeping under the thermal
envelope. Now that thermal framework is built-in to the kernel, we can
initialize it earlier to enable thermal mitigation during boot.

We also need the cpufreq HW drivers to be initialised earlier to act as the
cooling devices. This series only converts over the qcom-hw driver to
initialize earlier but can be extended to other platforms as well.

Amit Kucheria (5):
  thermal: Initialize thermal subsystem earlier
  cpufreq: Initialise the governors in core_initcall
  cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-dt driver earlier
  clk: qcom: Initialise clock drivers earlier
  cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move driver initialisation earlier

 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c            | 2 +-
 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_powersave.c    | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c    | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c         | 3 ++-
 11 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH v2 4/5] clk: qcom: Initialise clock drivers earlier

[Amit Kucheria]

Initialise the clock drivers on sdm845 and qcs404 in core_initcall so we
can have earlier access to cpufreq during booting.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c | 2 +-
 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
index 96a36f6ff667..20d4258f125b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int __init clk_rpmh_init(void)
 {
 	return platform_driver_register(&clk_rpmh_driver);
 }
-subsys_initcall(clk_rpmh_init);
+core_initcall(clk_rpmh_init);
 
 static void __exit clk_rpmh_exit(void)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c
index bd32212f37e6..9b0c4ce2ef4e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ static int __init gcc_qcs404_init(void)
 {
 	return platform_driver_register(&gcc_qcs404_driver);
 }
-subsys_initcall(gcc_qcs404_init);
+core_initcall(gcc_qcs404_init);
 
 static void __exit gcc_qcs404_exit(void)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c
index 95be125c3bdd..49dcff1af2db 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c
@@ -3628,7 +3628,7 @@ static int __init gcc_sdm845_init(void)
 {
 	return platform_driver_register(&gcc_sdm845_driver);
 }
-subsys_initcall(gcc_sdm845_init);
+core_initcall(gcc_sdm845_init);
 
 static void __exit gcc_sdm845_exit(void)
 {
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: qcom: Initialise clock drivers earlier

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-10-17 03:30:53)
> Initialise the clock drivers on sdm845 and qcs404 in core_initcall so we
> can have earlier access to cpufreq during booting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>

Makes me sad though.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Initialise thermal framework and cpufreq earlier during boot

[Amit Kucheria]

This is embarassing. I generated this series incorrectly. It is
missing a patch removing netlink support. v3 coming right up.

Sorry for the noise.

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:00 PM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Completely get rid of netlink support in the thermal framework.
> - This changes the early init patch to a single line - change to
>   core_initcall. Changed authorship of patch since it is nothing like the
>   original. Lina, let me know if you feel otherwise.
> - I've tested to make sure that the qcom-cpufreq-hw driver continues to
>   work correctly as a module so this won't impact Android's GKI plans.
> - Collected Acks
>
> Device boot needs to be as fast as possible while keeping under the thermal
> envelope. Now that thermal framework is built-in to the kernel, we can
> initialize it earlier to enable thermal mitigation during boot.
>
> We also need the cpufreq HW drivers to be initialised earlier to act as the
> cooling devices. This series only converts over the qcom-hw driver to
> initialize earlier but can be extended to other platforms as well.
>
> Amit Kucheria (5):
>   thermal: Initialize thermal subsystem earlier
>   cpufreq: Initialise the governors in core_initcall
>   cpufreq: Initialize cpufreq-dt driver earlier
>   clk: qcom: Initialise clock drivers earlier
>   cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move driver initialisation earlier
>
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c            | 2 +-
>  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qcs404.c          | 2 +-
>  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sdm845.c          | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c   | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_powersave.c    | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c    | 2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c      | 2 +-
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c         | 3 ++-
>  11 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>