[PATCH v1 8/9] kunit: add tests for filtering attributes

[Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>]

Add four tests to executor_test.c to test behavior of filtering attributes.

- parse_filter_attr_test - to test the parsing of inputted filters

- filter_attr_test - to test the filtering procedure on attributes

- filter_attr_empty_test - to test the behavior when all tests are filtered
  out

- filter_attr_skip_test - to test the configurable filter skip option

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
---

Changes since RFC v2:
- Change fake suite and test case names.
- Add a few ASSERT statements.

Changes since RFC v1:
- This is a new patch

 lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c
index d7ab069324b5..01280cb8d451 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/attributes.h>
 
 static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free);
 static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test,
@@ -108,11 +109,126 @@ static void filter_suites_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test)
 				"should be empty to indicate no match");
 }
 
+static void parse_filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int j, filter_count;
+	struct kunit_attr_filter *parsed_filters;
+	char *filters = "speed>slow, module!=example";
+	int err = 0;
+
+	filter_count = kunit_get_filter_count(filters);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter_count, 2);
+
+	parsed_filters = kunit_kcalloc(test, filter_count + 1, sizeof(*parsed_filters),
+			GFP_KERNEL);
+	for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++) {
+		parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filters, &err);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, err, 0, "failed to parse filter '%s'", filters[j]);
+	}
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, kunit_attr_filter_name(parsed_filters[0]), "speed");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, parsed_filters[0].input, ">slow");
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, kunit_attr_filter_name(parsed_filters[1]), "module");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, parsed_filters[1].input, "!=example");
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case dummy_attr_test_cases[] = {
+	/* .run_case is not important, just needs to be non-NULL */
+	{ .name = "slow", .run_case = dummy_test, .module_name = "dummy",
+	  .attr.speed = KUNIT_SPEED_SLOW },
+	{ .name = "normal", .run_case = dummy_test, .module_name = "dummy" },
+	{},
+};
+
+static void filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL};
+	struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]};
+	struct suite_set got;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "normal_suite", dummy_attr_test_cases);
+	subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "slow_suite", dummy_attr_test_cases);
+	subsuite[1]->attr.speed = KUNIT_SPEED_SLOW; // Set suite attribute
+
+	/*
+	 * Want: normal_suite(slow, normal), slow_suite(slow, normal),
+	 *		NULL -> normal_suite(normal), NULL
+	 *
+	 * The normal test in slow_suite is filtered out because the speed
+	 * attribute is unset and thus, the filtering is based on the parent attribute
+	 * of slow.
+	 */
+	got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, "speed>slow", NULL, &err);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
+	kfree_at_end(test, got.start);
+
+	/* Validate we just have normal_suite */
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, got.start[0]->name, "normal_suite");
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, got.end - got.start, 1);
+
+	/* Now validate we just have normal test case */
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[0].name, "normal");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[1].name);
+}
+
+static void filter_attr_empty_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL};
+	struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]};
+	struct suite_set got;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_attr_test_cases);
+	subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_attr_test_cases);
+
+	got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, "module!=dummy", NULL, &err);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
+	kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end,
+				"should be empty to indicate no match");
+}
+
+static void filter_attr_skip_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *subsuite[2] = {NULL};
+	struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[1]};
+	struct suite_set got;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite", dummy_attr_test_cases);
+
+	/* Want: suite(slow, normal), NULL -> suite(slow with SKIP, normal), NULL */
+	got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, "speed>slow", "skip", &err);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0);
+	kfree_at_end(test, got.start);
+
+	/* Validate we have both the slow and normal test */
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, kunit_suite_num_test_cases(got.start[0]), 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[0].name, "slow");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[1].name, "normal");
+
+	/* Now ensure slow is skipped and normal is not */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[0].status, KUNIT_SKIPPED);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[1].status);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case executor_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(parse_filter_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_test_glob_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_to_empty_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(parse_filter_attr_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(filter_attr_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(filter_attr_empty_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(filter_attr_skip_test),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog