linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hverkuil at xs4all.nl (Hans Verkuil)
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v4 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:12:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32aff389-a4c0-3f9a-73cf-a8c5def9ea29@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001031823.312020-3-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>

On 10/1/19 5:18 AM, Jiunn Chang wrote:
> Tuner step increment/decrement will select the next highest or next
> lowest service frequency.  There are a total of three possible
> frequencies given a broadcast type and system for a total of 81 analog
> channels.
> 
> Opcodes implemented:
>   - <Tuner Step Increment>
>   - <Tuner Step Decrement>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3 at gmail.com>
> ---
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp |  2 +-
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h   |  3 +-
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp    | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> index 4243fdd9..8375404e 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void state_init(struct node &node)
>  	node.state.sac_active = false;
>  	node.state.volume = 50;
>  	node.state.mute = false;
> -	analog_tuner_init(&node.state.tuner_dev_info);
> +	analog_tuner_init(&node.state);
>  }
>  
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> index a53c16fe..d8ac4e77 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct state {
>  	unsigned rc_press_hold_count;
>  	unsigned rc_duration_sum;
>  	struct cec_op_tuner_device_info tuner_dev_info;
> +	unsigned int freq_idx;
>  };
>  
>  struct node {
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ std::string opcode2s(const struct cec_msg *msg);
>  void sad_encode(const struct short_audio_desc *sad, __u32 *descriptor);
>  
>  // cec-tuner.cpp
> -void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *tuner_dev_info);
> +void analog_tuner_init(struct state *state);
>  void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, unsigned me);
>  
>  // CEC processing
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> index d74981b2..6f14b059 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>  #include "cec-follower.h"
>  
>  #define NUM_ANALOG_FREQS	3
> +#define ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(x) \
> +	ARRAY_SIZE(x) * ARRAY_SIZE(*x) * ARRAY_SIZE(**x)

This can be a bit easier:

#define TOT_ANALOG_FREQS (sizeof(analog_freqs_khz) / sizeof(analog_freqs_khz[0][0][0]))

>  
>  /*
>   * This table contains analog television channel frequencies in KHz.  There are
> @@ -90,10 +92,12 @@ static unsigned int analog_freqs_khz[3][9][NUM_ANALOG_FREQS] =
>  	}
>  };
>  
> -void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info)
> +void analog_tuner_init(struct state *state)
>  {
> +	struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &state->tuner_dev_info;
>  	unsigned int freq_khz;
>  
> +	state->freq_idx = 0;
>  	info->rec_flag = CEC_OP_REC_FLAG_NOT_USED;
>  	info->tuner_display_info = CEC_OP_TUNER_DISPLAY_INFO_ANALOGUE;
>  	info->is_analog = true;
> @@ -103,23 +107,41 @@ void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info)
>  	info->analog.ana_freq = (freq_khz * 10) / 625;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int analog_get_nearest_freq(__u8 ana_bcast_type, __u8 ana_bcast_system,
> -                                            int ana_freq_khz)
> +static unsigned int analog_get_nearest_freq_idx(__u8 ana_bcast_type, __u8 ana_bcast_system,
> +						int ana_freq_khz)
>  {
>  	int nearest = analog_freqs_khz[ana_bcast_type][ana_bcast_system][0];
> +	unsigned int offset = 0;
>  
>  	for (int i = 0; i < NUM_ANALOG_FREQS; i++) {
>  		int freq = analog_freqs_khz[ana_bcast_type][ana_bcast_system][i];
>  
> -		if (abs(ana_freq_khz - freq) < abs(ana_freq_khz - nearest))
> +		if (abs(ana_freq_khz - freq) < abs(ana_freq_khz - nearest)) {
>  			nearest = freq;
> +			offset++;

This should be 'offset = i;'

> +		}
>  	}
> -	return nearest;
> +	return NUM_ANALOG_FREQS * ((ana_bcast_type * 9) + ana_bcast_system) + offset;
>  }
>  
> -static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> +static void analog_get_type_system_idx(struct node *node)

'get' implies that data is returned, and that's not the case here.

How about analog_update_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, unsigned int idx);

So the index is passed as an argument and this function sets state.freq_idx as well.

>  {
>  	struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &node->state.tuner_dev_info;
> +	unsigned int tot_freqs = NUM_ANALOG_FREQS * 9;
> +	unsigned int freq_idx = node->state.freq_idx;
> +	unsigned int freq_khz;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +
> +	info->analog.ana_bcast_type = freq_idx / tot_freqs;
> +	info->analog.bcast_system =
> +		(freq_idx - (tot_freqs * info->analog.ana_bcast_type)) / NUM_ANALOG_FREQS;
> +	idx = freq_idx % NUM_ANALOG_FREQS;
> +	freq_khz = analog_freqs_khz[info->analog.ana_bcast_type][info->analog.bcast_system][idx];
> +	info->analog.ana_freq = (freq_khz * 10) / 625;
> +}
> +
> +static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> +{
>  	__u8 type;
>  	__u16 freq;
>  	__u8 system;
> @@ -127,11 +149,9 @@ static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
>  	cec_ops_select_analogue_service(msg, &type, &freq, &system);
>  	if (type < 3 && system < 9) {
>  		int freq_khz = (freq * 625) / 10;
> -		unsigned int nearest = analog_get_nearest_freq(type, system,
> -							       freq_khz);
> -		info->analog.ana_bcast_type = type;
> -		info->analog.ana_freq = (nearest * 10) / 625;
> -		info->analog.bcast_system = system;
> +
> +		node->state.freq_idx = analog_get_nearest_freq_idx(type, system, freq_khz);
> +		analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
>  		return true;
>  	}
>  	return false;
> @@ -180,12 +200,29 @@ void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, uns
>  		return;
>  
>  	case CEC_MSG_SELECT_DIGITAL_SERVICE:
> -	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT:
> -	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT:
> -		if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me))
> +	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT: {
> +		if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me))
>  			break;
> +
> +		if (node->state.freq_idx == 0)
> +			node->state.freq_idx = ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(analog_freqs_khz) - 1;
> +		else
> +			node->state.freq_idx--;
> +		analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
> +	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT: {
> +		if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me))
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (node->state.freq_idx == ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(analog_freqs_khz) - 1)
> +			node->state.freq_idx = 0;
> +		else
> +			node->state.freq_idx++;
> +		analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
>  		/*
>  		  One Touch Record
> 

It's getting close...

Regards,

	Hans

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hverkuil@xs4all.nl (Hans Verkuil)
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v4 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:12:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32aff389-a4c0-3f9a-73cf-a8c5def9ea29@xs4all.nl> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191001071257.tJgD7UlH_bIBeLazUADazTINSppMRWvoh7Cr-natrXM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001031823.312020-3-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>

On 10/1/19 5:18 AM, Jiunn Chang wrote:
> Tuner step increment/decrement will select the next highest or next
> lowest service frequency.  There are a total of three possible
> frequencies given a broadcast type and system for a total of 81 analog
> channels.
> 
> Opcodes implemented:
>   - <Tuner Step Increment>
>   - <Tuner Step Decrement>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3 at gmail.com>
> ---
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp |  2 +-
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h   |  3 +-
>  utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp    | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> index 4243fdd9..8375404e 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void state_init(struct node &node)
>  	node.state.sac_active = false;
>  	node.state.volume = 50;
>  	node.state.mute = false;
> -	analog_tuner_init(&node.state.tuner_dev_info);
> +	analog_tuner_init(&node.state);
>  }
>  
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> index a53c16fe..d8ac4e77 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct state {
>  	unsigned rc_press_hold_count;
>  	unsigned rc_duration_sum;
>  	struct cec_op_tuner_device_info tuner_dev_info;
> +	unsigned int freq_idx;
>  };
>  
>  struct node {
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ std::string opcode2s(const struct cec_msg *msg);
>  void sad_encode(const struct short_audio_desc *sad, __u32 *descriptor);
>  
>  // cec-tuner.cpp
> -void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *tuner_dev_info);
> +void analog_tuner_init(struct state *state);
>  void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, unsigned me);
>  
>  // CEC processing
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> index d74981b2..6f14b059 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>  #include "cec-follower.h"
>  
>  #define NUM_ANALOG_FREQS	3
> +#define ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(x) \
> +	ARRAY_SIZE(x) * ARRAY_SIZE(*x) * ARRAY_SIZE(**x)

This can be a bit easier:

#define TOT_ANALOG_FREQS (sizeof(analog_freqs_khz) / sizeof(analog_freqs_khz[0][0][0]))

>  
>  /*
>   * This table contains analog television channel frequencies in KHz.  There are
> @@ -90,10 +92,12 @@ static unsigned int analog_freqs_khz[3][9][NUM_ANALOG_FREQS] =
>  	}
>  };
>  
> -void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info)
> +void analog_tuner_init(struct state *state)
>  {
> +	struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &state->tuner_dev_info;
>  	unsigned int freq_khz;
>  
> +	state->freq_idx = 0;
>  	info->rec_flag = CEC_OP_REC_FLAG_NOT_USED;
>  	info->tuner_display_info = CEC_OP_TUNER_DISPLAY_INFO_ANALOGUE;
>  	info->is_analog = true;
> @@ -103,23 +107,41 @@ void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info)
>  	info->analog.ana_freq = (freq_khz * 10) / 625;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int analog_get_nearest_freq(__u8 ana_bcast_type, __u8 ana_bcast_system,
> -                                            int ana_freq_khz)
> +static unsigned int analog_get_nearest_freq_idx(__u8 ana_bcast_type, __u8 ana_bcast_system,
> +						int ana_freq_khz)
>  {
>  	int nearest = analog_freqs_khz[ana_bcast_type][ana_bcast_system][0];
> +	unsigned int offset = 0;
>  
>  	for (int i = 0; i < NUM_ANALOG_FREQS; i++) {
>  		int freq = analog_freqs_khz[ana_bcast_type][ana_bcast_system][i];
>  
> -		if (abs(ana_freq_khz - freq) < abs(ana_freq_khz - nearest))
> +		if (abs(ana_freq_khz - freq) < abs(ana_freq_khz - nearest)) {
>  			nearest = freq;
> +			offset++;

This should be 'offset = i;'

> +		}
>  	}
> -	return nearest;
> +	return NUM_ANALOG_FREQS * ((ana_bcast_type * 9) + ana_bcast_system) + offset;
>  }
>  
> -static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> +static void analog_get_type_system_idx(struct node *node)

'get' implies that data is returned, and that's not the case here.

How about analog_update_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, unsigned int idx);

So the index is passed as an argument and this function sets state.freq_idx as well.

>  {
>  	struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &node->state.tuner_dev_info;
> +	unsigned int tot_freqs = NUM_ANALOG_FREQS * 9;
> +	unsigned int freq_idx = node->state.freq_idx;
> +	unsigned int freq_khz;
> +	unsigned int idx;
> +
> +	info->analog.ana_bcast_type = freq_idx / tot_freqs;
> +	info->analog.bcast_system =
> +		(freq_idx - (tot_freqs * info->analog.ana_bcast_type)) / NUM_ANALOG_FREQS;
> +	idx = freq_idx % NUM_ANALOG_FREQS;
> +	freq_khz = analog_freqs_khz[info->analog.ana_bcast_type][info->analog.bcast_system][idx];
> +	info->analog.ana_freq = (freq_khz * 10) / 625;
> +}
> +
> +static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> +{
>  	__u8 type;
>  	__u16 freq;
>  	__u8 system;
> @@ -127,11 +149,9 @@ static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
>  	cec_ops_select_analogue_service(msg, &type, &freq, &system);
>  	if (type < 3 && system < 9) {
>  		int freq_khz = (freq * 625) / 10;
> -		unsigned int nearest = analog_get_nearest_freq(type, system,
> -							       freq_khz);
> -		info->analog.ana_bcast_type = type;
> -		info->analog.ana_freq = (nearest * 10) / 625;
> -		info->analog.bcast_system = system;
> +
> +		node->state.freq_idx = analog_get_nearest_freq_idx(type, system, freq_khz);
> +		analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
>  		return true;
>  	}
>  	return false;
> @@ -180,12 +200,29 @@ void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, uns
>  		return;
>  
>  	case CEC_MSG_SELECT_DIGITAL_SERVICE:
> -	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT:
> -	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT:
> -		if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me))
> +	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT: {
> +		if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me))
>  			break;
> +
> +		if (node->state.freq_idx == 0)
> +			node->state.freq_idx = ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(analog_freqs_khz) - 1;
> +		else
> +			node->state.freq_idx--;
> +		analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
> +	case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT: {
> +		if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me))
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (node->state.freq_idx == ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(analog_freqs_khz) - 1)
> +			node->state.freq_idx = 0;
> +		else
> +			node->state.freq_idx++;
> +		analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
>  		/*
>  		  One Touch Record
> 

It's getting close...

Regards,

	Hans

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-01  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-24 14:17 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 0/2] cec-compliance: tuner control c0d1n61at3
2019-09-24 14:17 ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 14:17 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement c0d1n61at3
2019-09-24 14:17   ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 15:20   ` hverkuil
2019-09-24 15:20     ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-24 14:17 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 2/2] cec-compliance: add/refactor tuner control tests c0d1n61at3
2019-09-24 14:17   ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 19:24 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2 0/2] cec-compliance: tuner control c0d1n61at3
2019-09-24 19:24   ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30  4:30   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v3 0/3] " c0d1n61at3
2019-09-30  4:30     ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01  3:18     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v4 " c0d1n61at3
2019-10-01  3:18       ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03  3:18       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 0/2] " c0d1n61at3
2019-10-03  3:18         ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-04  4:05         ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v6 0/1] " c0d1n61at3
2019-10-04  4:05           ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-04  4:05         ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v6 1/1] Add test for new features in cec-follower c0d1n61at3
2019-10-04  4:05           ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03  3:18       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement c0d1n61at3
2019-10-03  3:18         ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03  3:18       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 2/2] Add test for new features in cec-follower c0d1n61at3
2019-10-03  3:18         ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03  6:51         ` hverkuil
2019-10-03  6:51           ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-01  3:18     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v4 1/3] cec-follower: fix bugs for tuner emulation c0d1n61at3
2019-10-01  3:18       ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01  3:18     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v4 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement c0d1n61at3
2019-10-01  3:18       ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01  7:12       ` hverkuil [this message]
2019-10-01  7:12         ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-01  3:18     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v4 3/3] cec-compliance: add tuner control test c0d1n61at3
2019-10-01  3:18       ` Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01  7:51       ` hverkuil
2019-10-01  7:51         ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-30  4:30   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v3 1/3] cec-follower: fix bugs for tuner emulation c0d1n61at3
2019-09-30  4:30     ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30  9:12     ` hverkuil
2019-09-30  9:12       ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-30  4:30   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v3 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement c0d1n61at3
2019-09-30  4:30     ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30  9:35     ` hverkuil
2019-09-30  9:35       ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-30  4:30   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v3 3/3] cec-compliance: refactor tuner control tests c0d1n61at3
2019-09-30  4:30     ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30  9:43     ` hverkuil
2019-09-30  9:43       ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-24 19:24 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement c0d1n61at3
2019-09-24 19:24   ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 19:31   ` skhan
2019-09-24 19:31     ` Shuah Khan
2019-09-25  6:54   ` hverkuil
2019-09-25  6:54     ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-25  7:12     ` hverkuil
2019-09-25  7:12       ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-24 19:24 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2 2/2] cec-compliance: add/refactor tuner control tests c0d1n61at3
2019-09-24 19:24   ` Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 19:44   ` skhan
2019-09-24 19:44     ` Shuah Khan
2019-09-25  7:22   ` hverkuil
2019-09-25  7:22     ` Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32aff389-a4c0-3f9a-73cf-a8c5def9ea29@xs4all.nl \
    --to=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).