linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm at xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: Setting monotonic time?
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:14:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in2jo8u6.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810030711520.1435@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:25:35 +0200 (CEST)")

Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> writes:

> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Direct access to hardware/drivers and not through an abstraction like
>> the vfs (an abstraction over block devices) can legitimately be handled
>> by hotplug events.  I unplug one keyboard I plug in another.
>> 
>> I don't know if the input layer is more of a general abstraction
>> or more of a hardware device.  I have not dug into it but my guess
>> is abstraction from what I have heard.
>> 
>> The scary difficulty here is if after restart input is reporting times
>> in CLOCK_MONOTONIC and the applications in the namespace are talking
>> about times in CLOCK_MONOTONIC_SYNC.  Then there is an issue.  As even
>> with a fixed offset the times don't match up.
>> 
>> So a time namespace absolutely needs to do is figure out how to deal
>> with all of the kernel interfaces reporting times and figure out how to
>> report them in the current time namespace.
>
> So you want to talk to Arnd who is leading the y2038 effort. He knowns how
> many and which interfaces are involved aside of the obvious core timer
> ones. It's quite an amount and the problem is that you really need to do
> that at the interface level, because many of those time stamps are taken in
> contexts which are completely oblivious of name spaces. Ditto for timeouts
> and similar things which are handed in through these interfaces.

Yep.  That sounds right.

Eric

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: Setting monotonic time?
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:14:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in2jo8u6.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181003061425.Nqt1D3tCf_HjmYevUzmIl6xbzLoAh5xYwmNt7Q5aA-Q@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810030711520.1435@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2018 07:25:35 +0200 (CEST)")

Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> writes:

> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Direct access to hardware/drivers and not through an abstraction like
>> the vfs (an abstraction over block devices) can legitimately be handled
>> by hotplug events.  I unplug one keyboard I plug in another.
>> 
>> I don't know if the input layer is more of a general abstraction
>> or more of a hardware device.  I have not dug into it but my guess
>> is abstraction from what I have heard.
>> 
>> The scary difficulty here is if after restart input is reporting times
>> in CLOCK_MONOTONIC and the applications in the namespace are talking
>> about times in CLOCK_MONOTONIC_SYNC.  Then there is an issue.  As even
>> with a fixed offset the times don't match up.
>> 
>> So a time namespace absolutely needs to do is figure out how to deal
>> with all of the kernel interfaces reporting times and figure out how to
>> report them in the current time namespace.
>
> So you want to talk to Arnd who is leading the y2038 effort. He knowns how
> many and which interfaces are involved aside of the obvious core timer
> ones. It's quite an amount and the problem is that you really need to do
> that at the interface level, because many of those time stamps are taken in
> contexts which are completely oblivious of name spaces. Ditto for timeouts
> and similar things which are handed in through these interfaces.

Yep.  That sounds right.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-19 20:50 [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace dima
2018-09-19 20:50 ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 16/20] selftest: Add Time Namespace test for supported clocks dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-24 21:36   ` shuah
2018-09-24 21:36     ` Shuah Khan
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 17/20] selftest/timens: Add test for timerfd dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 18/20] selftest/timens: Add test for clock_nanosleep dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 19/20] timens/selftest: Add procfs selftest dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-19 20:50 ` [RFC 20/20] timens/selftest: Add timer offsets test dima
2018-09-19 20:50   ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-21 12:27 ` [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace ebiederm
2018-09-21 12:27   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-24 20:51   ` avagin
2018-09-24 20:51     ` Andrey Vagin
2018-09-24 22:02     ` ebiederm
2018-09-24 22:02       ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-25  1:42       ` avagin
2018-09-25  1:42         ` Andrey Vagin
2018-09-26 17:36         ` ebiederm
2018-09-26 17:36           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-26 17:59           ` 0x7f454c46
2018-09-26 17:59             ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-09-27 21:30           ` tglx
2018-09-27 21:30             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-27 21:41             ` tglx
2018-09-27 21:41               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 23:20               ` avagin
2018-10-01 23:20                 ` Andrey Vagin
2018-10-02  6:15                 ` tglx
2018-10-02  6:15                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02 21:05                   ` 0x7f454c46
2018-10-02 21:05                     ` Dmitry Safonov
2018-10-02 21:26                     ` tglx
2018-10-02 21:26                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-28 17:03             ` ebiederm
2018-09-28 17:03               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-09-28 19:32               ` tglx
2018-09-28 19:32                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01  9:05                 ` ebiederm
2018-10-01  9:05                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-01  9:15                 ` Setting monotonic time? ebiederm
2018-10-01  9:15                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-01 18:52                   ` tglx
2018-10-01 18:52                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02 20:00                     ` arnd
2018-10-02 20:00                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-02 20:06                       ` tglx
2018-10-02 20:06                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  4:50                         ` ebiederm
2018-10-03  4:50                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-03  5:25                           ` tglx
2018-10-03  5:25                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  6:14                             ` ebiederm [this message]
2018-10-03  6:14                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-03  7:02                               ` arnd
2018-10-03  7:02                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-10-03  6:14                             ` tglx
2018-10-03  6:14                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-01 20:51                   ` avagin
2018-10-01 20:51                     ` Andrey Vagin
2018-10-02  6:16                     ` tglx
2018-10-02  6:16                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-21  1:41               ` [RFC 00/20] ns: Introduce Time Namespace avagin
2018-10-21  1:41                 ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-21  3:54                 ` avagin
2018-10-21  3:54                   ` Andrei Vagin
2018-10-29 20:33                 ` tglx
2018-10-29 20:33                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-29 21:21                   ` ebiederm
2018-10-29 21:21                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-29 21:36                     ` tglx
2018-10-29 21:36                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-31 16:26                   ` avagin
2018-10-31 16:26                     ` Andrei Vagin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87in2jo8u6.fsf@xmission.com \
    --to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).