From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
To: Kars de Jong <jongk@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zorro_esp: increase maximum dma length to 65536 bytes
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 08:26:32 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c356175-e490-68c0-6114-5192eedc3a4f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACz-3rjUh8tcShX5OPi+37JvF8PqG-8AEf5uMQHjMynSaVa1gw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Kars,
thanks for your patch!
On 10/11/19 10:01 PM, Kars de Jong wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Op zo 10 nov. 2019 om 03:36 schreef Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>:
>> All of the old board-specific drivers used a max transfer length of
>> 0x1000000, only the fastlane driver used 0xfffc.
> Yes, I also found this when checking the old drivers.
>
>> That lower limit might
>> be due to a DMA limitation on the fastlane board. We could accommodate
>> the different limit for this board by using a board-specific
>> dma_length_limit() callback...
> Yes, I think that's the best idea for now. Oktagon also used to have a
> different limit but that was never ported to the new ESP core.
I can't remember the details, but as far as I recall it, the Oktagon
used pseudo-DMA rather than hardware DMA. At the time I started porting
Zorro ESP drivers to the new core, pseudo-DMA code was available for Mac
only, and no PIO transfer for data phases at all, so I decided to leave
that out altogether.
Might be a lot easier now that Finn has moved the PIO support code into
the core driver. Someone could start with a PIO mode driver and add PDMA
later.
>>> case for any of the cards the zorro_esp drives, it might be better to
>>> lower the max length to 61440 (64k-4k) so the residual is a page.
>> For the benefit of keeping the code simple, and avoid retesting the
>> fastlane board, that might indeed be the better solution.
> But it's slower... :-P
I wonder what max. transfer size had been used so far, in the majority
of cases. I hadn't observed this bug in my tests of the ESP driver on
elgar. So it might not matter so much in practice.
> Also, I may be adding another board-specific version for the Blizzard
> 12x0 IV to enable 24-bit transfers, like the am53c974 driver does, in
> a later patch.
If we can differentiate between the Mark IV board and the Mark II board
in a reliable way, fine. I can't remember whether I've had a report on
that ever.
I'd suggest to change the transfer size limit to 60k in the first
instance, and add board-specific tweaks as needed when you add 24 bit
DMA support for the Mark IV.
Cheers,
Michael
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kars.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-10 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 20:56 Amiga PCMCIA network card support Andreas 'count' Kotes
2019-10-25 7:25 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-25 11:49 ` Andreas 'count' Kotes
2019-10-28 9:19 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 11:08 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-28 13:00 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 13:20 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-28 15:39 ` ESP SCSI driver (was: Amiga PCMCIA network card support) Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 18:32 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-29 9:37 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-29 20:20 ` ESP SCSI driver Michael Schmitz
2019-10-29 22:05 ` [PATCH] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 0:23 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 7:11 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 18:42 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 0:31 ` Finn Thain
2019-10-30 1:06 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 7:25 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 8:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-30 9:08 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 18:34 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 18:52 ` Brad Boyer
2019-10-30 7:22 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 23:15 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] Some esp_scsi updates Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] esp_scsi: Correct ordering of PCSCSI definition in esp_rev enum Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 23:07 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 8:00 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-13 22:25 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 15:03 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 23:18 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-12 23:57 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 9:30 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-13 22:24 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-14 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Some esp_scsi updates Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] esp_scsi: Correct ordering of PCSCSI definition in esp_rev enum Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:06 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:07 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Some esp_scsi updates Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] esp_scsi: Correct ordering of PCSCSI definition in esp_rev enum Kars de Jong
2019-11-15 2:13 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-15 7:04 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-11-15 2:09 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-18 13:27 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-09 19:14 ` [PATCH] zorro_esp: increase maximum dma length to 65536 bytes Kars de Jong
2019-11-09 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-10 2:36 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-11-10 9:01 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-10 19:26 ` Michael Schmitz [this message]
2019-11-11 8:47 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-10 19:35 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-12 17:55 ` [PATCH v2] zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65536 bytes (except on Fastlane) Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 22:46 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 2:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-11-12 9:34 ` [PATCH] zorro_esp: increase maximum dma length to 65536 bytes Kars de Jong
2019-11-09 22:53 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-10 9:06 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 23:38 ` ESP SCSI driver (was: Amiga PCMCIA network card support) Finn Thain
2019-10-29 11:52 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-29 20:16 ` ESP SCSI driver Michael Schmitz
2019-10-28 22:31 ` Amiga PCMCIA network card support Finn Thain
2019-10-29 8:56 ` FOSDEM (was: Re: Amiga PCMCIA network card support) Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-29 9:13 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-28 22:08 ` Amiga PCMCIA network card support Finn Thain
2019-10-29 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-29 9:12 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-29 9:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-29 9:20 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-29 9:40 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 6:57 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c356175-e490-68c0-6114-5192eedc3a4f@gmail.com \
--to=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jongk@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).