From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Kars de Jong <jongk@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
schmitzmic@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:24:37 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1.1911140903490.21@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACz-3rhP9pfg4tVe5GikX-7MWC2sGtE0AsoPeuUBR-a07YxQFA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Kars de Jong wrote:
> Op wo 13 nov. 2019 om 00:18 schreef Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>:
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > > +#define ESP_UID_REV 0x07 /* ESP revision bitmask */
> >
> > This is unused.
>
> Yes, but it was already there, I just moved it.
>
Sure, but if you move dead code, it creates churn which can lead to merge
conflicts. And such changes still require code review.
Also, you'd lose an opportunity to delete the dead code, which is a pity,
since that would then require a separate patch.
> I prefer to leave it in, since it describes the register layout.
>
Well, the driver can't be understood from the code alone. The datasheet
will always be required reading.
> > > +#define ESP_UID_FAM 0xf8 /* ESP family bitmask */
> > > +
> > > +#define ESP_FAMILY(uid) (((uid) & ESP_UID_FAM) >> 3)
> > > +
> >
> > The ESP_UID_FAM symbol only appears here. I don't think it adds value.
>
> OK, I can just change the macro to:
>
> #define ESP_FAMILY(uid) (((uid) & 0xf8) >> 3)
>
Now that I understand the relationship between UID and Family, I see why
you did this.
> > > +/* Values for the ESP family */
> >
> > I would omit that comment.
>
> I will change it to "Values for the ESP family bits" as you suggested
> in the next mail.
>
Great.
> > > #define ESP_UID_F100A 0x00 /* ESP FAS100A */
> > > #define ESP_UID_F236 0x02 /* ESP FAS236 */
> > > -#define ESP_UID_REV 0x07 /* ESP revision */
> > > -#define ESP_UID_FAM 0xf8 /* ESP family */
> > > +#define ESP_UID_HME 0x0a /* FAS HME */
> > > +#define ESP_UID_FSC 0x14 /* NCR/Symbios Logic FSC */
> > >
> >
> > Is there a distinction between the chip's uid and the chip's family?
>
> Yes, the complete UID also includes the revision. The old driver had
> cases where the family code was the same but the revision was different.
>
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
--
> Kind regards,
>
> Kars.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 20:56 Amiga PCMCIA network card support Andreas 'count' Kotes
2019-10-25 7:25 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-25 11:49 ` Andreas 'count' Kotes
2019-10-28 9:19 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 11:08 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-28 13:00 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 13:20 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-28 15:39 ` ESP SCSI driver (was: Amiga PCMCIA network card support) Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 18:32 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-29 9:37 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-29 20:20 ` ESP SCSI driver Michael Schmitz
2019-10-29 22:05 ` [PATCH] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 0:23 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 7:11 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 18:42 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 0:31 ` Finn Thain
2019-10-30 1:06 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 7:25 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 8:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-30 9:08 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 18:34 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-10-30 18:52 ` Brad Boyer
2019-10-30 7:22 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-30 23:15 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] Some esp_scsi updates Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] esp_scsi: Correct ordering of PCSCSI definition in esp_rev enum Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 23:07 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 8:00 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-13 22:25 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 15:03 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 23:18 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-12 23:57 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 9:30 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-13 22:24 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2019-11-14 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Some esp_scsi updates Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] esp_scsi: Correct ordering of PCSCSI definition in esp_rev enum Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:06 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:07 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Some esp_scsi updates Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] esp_scsi: Correct ordering of PCSCSI definition in esp_rev enum Kars de Jong
2019-11-15 2:13 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-15 7:04 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-14 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] esp_scsi: Add support for FSC chip Kars de Jong
2019-11-15 2:09 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-18 13:27 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-09 19:14 ` [PATCH] zorro_esp: increase maximum dma length to 65536 bytes Kars de Jong
2019-11-09 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-10 2:36 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-11-10 9:01 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-10 19:26 ` Michael Schmitz
2019-11-11 8:47 ` Kars de Jong
2019-11-10 19:35 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-12 17:55 ` [PATCH v2] zorro_esp: Limit DMA transfers to 65536 bytes (except on Fastlane) Kars de Jong
2019-11-12 22:46 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-13 2:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-11-12 9:34 ` [PATCH] zorro_esp: increase maximum dma length to 65536 bytes Kars de Jong
2019-11-09 22:53 ` Finn Thain
2019-11-10 9:06 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 23:38 ` ESP SCSI driver (was: Amiga PCMCIA network card support) Finn Thain
2019-10-29 11:52 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-29 20:16 ` ESP SCSI driver Michael Schmitz
2019-10-28 22:31 ` Amiga PCMCIA network card support Finn Thain
2019-10-29 8:56 ` FOSDEM (was: Re: Amiga PCMCIA network card support) Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-29 9:13 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-28 22:08 ` Amiga PCMCIA network card support Finn Thain
2019-10-29 9:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-29 9:12 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-29 9:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-29 9:20 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2019-10-29 9:40 ` Kars de Jong
2019-10-28 6:57 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1.1911140903490.21@nippy.intranet \
--to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jongk@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).