From: "HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)" <k-hagio-ab@nec.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "lijiang@redhat.com" <lijiang@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 01:51:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8939ea67-ca27-1aa5-dfff-37d78ad59bb8@nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPmesS66PTl+1Mdz@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 2023/09/07 18:58, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 09/07/23 at 11:39am, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 10:17:39AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> Add Kazu and Lianbo to CC, and kexec mailing list
>>>
>>> On 08/29/23 at 10:11am, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
>>>> Store allocated objects in a separate nodes. A va->va_start
>>>> address is converted into a correct node where it should
>>>> be placed and resided. An addr_to_node() function is used
>>>> to do a proper address conversion to determine a node that
>>>> contains a VA.
>>>>
>>>> Such approach balances VAs across nodes as a result an access
>>>> becomes scalable. Number of nodes in a system depends on number
>>>> of CPUs divided by two. The density factor in this case is 1/2.
>>>>
>>>> Please note:
>>>>
>>>> 1. As of now allocated VAs are bound to a node-0. It means the
>>>> patch does not give any difference comparing with a current
>>>> behavior;
>>>>
>>>> 2. The global vmap_area_lock, vmap_area_root are removed as there
>>>> is no need in it anymore. The vmap_area_list is still kept and
>>>> is _empty_. It is exported for a kexec only;
>>>
>>> I haven't taken a test, while accessing all nodes' busy tree to get
>>> va of the lowest address could severely impact kcore reading efficiency
>>> on system with many vmap nodes. People doing live debugging via
>>> /proc/kcore will get a little surprise.
>>>
>>>
>>> Empty vmap_area_list will break makedumpfile utility, Crash utility
>>> could be impactd too. I checked makedumpfile code, it relys on
>>> vmap_area_list to deduce the vmalloc_start value.
>>>
>> It is left part and i hope i fix it in v3. The problem here is
>> we can not give an opportunity to access to vmap internals from
>> outside. This is just not correct, i.e. you are not allowed to
>> access the list directly.
>
> Right. Thanks for the fix in v3, that is a relief of makedumpfile and
> crash.
>
> Hi Kazu,
>
> Meanwhile, I am thinking if we should evaluate the necessity of
> vmap_area_list in makedumpfile and Crash. In makedumpfile, we just use
> vmap_area_list to deduce VMALLOC_START. Wondering if we can export
> VMALLOC_START directly. Surely, the lowest va->va_start in vmap_area_list
> is a tighter low boundary of vmalloc area and can reduce unnecessary
> scanning below the lowest va. Not sure if this is the reason people
> decided to export vmap_area_list.
The kernel commit acd99dbf5402 introduced the original vmlist entry to
vmcoreinfo, but there is no information about why it did not export
VMALLOC_START directly.
If VMALLOC_START is exported directly to vmcoreinfo, I think it would be
enough for makedumpfile.
Thanks,
Kazu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-08 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 8:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: vmalloc: Add va_alloc() helper Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 15:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: vmalloc: Rename adjust_va_to_fit_type() function Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:27 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: vmalloc: Move vmap_init_free_space() down in vmalloc.c Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:52 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 14:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30 14:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 2:17 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 9:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 9:58 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 1:51 ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) [this message]
2023-09-08 4:43 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 5:01 ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08 6:44 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 11:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-08 11:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 13:23 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11 2:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 16:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global purge_vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11 2:57 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:00 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 6:04 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 19:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 0:06 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:33 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11 3:25 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:10 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:21 ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vread_iter Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11 3:58 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 18:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:42 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:42 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-14 3:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14 3:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 10:59 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes/node_size based on CPU-cores Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:03 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-31 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Baoquan He
2023-08-31 16:26 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 14:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-05 6:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-06 20:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-09-07 9:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8939ea67-ca27-1aa5-dfff-37d78ad59bb8@nec.com \
--to=k-hagio-ab@nec.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).