linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:53:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZP9GGW/q0nCFelLf@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZP59pbh9SKROtjlr@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:38:29AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 08/29/23 at 10:11am, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > Store allocated objects in a separate nodes. A va->va_start
> > address is converted into a correct node where it should
> > be placed and resided. An addr_to_node() function is used
> > to do a proper address conversion to determine a node that
> > contains a VA.
> > 
> > Such approach balances VAs across nodes as a result an access
> > becomes scalable. Number of nodes in a system depends on number
> > of CPUs divided by two. The density factor in this case is 1/2.
> > 
> > Please note:
> > 
> > 1. As of now allocated VAs are bound to a node-0. It means the
> >    patch does not give any difference comparing with a current
> >    behavior;
> > 
> > 2. The global vmap_area_lock, vmap_area_root are removed as there
> >    is no need in it anymore. The vmap_area_list is still kept and
> >    is _empty_. It is exported for a kexec only;
> > 
> > 3. The vmallocinfo and vread() have to be reworked to be able to
> >    handle multiple nodes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/vmalloc.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 161 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > index b7deacca1483..ae0368c314ff 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > @@ -728,11 +728,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_pfn);
> >  #define DEBUG_AUGMENT_LOWEST_MATCH_CHECK 0
> >  
> >  
> > -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmap_area_lock);
> >  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(free_vmap_area_lock);
> >  /* Export for kexec only */
> >  LIST_HEAD(vmap_area_list);
> > -static struct rb_root vmap_area_root = RB_ROOT;
> >  static bool vmap_initialized __read_mostly;
> >  
> >  static struct rb_root purge_vmap_area_root = RB_ROOT;
> > @@ -772,6 +770,38 @@ static struct rb_root free_vmap_area_root = RB_ROOT;
> >   */
> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmap_area *, ne_fit_preload_node);
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * An effective vmap-node logic. Users make use of nodes instead
> > + * of a global heap. It allows to balance an access and mitigate
> > + * contention.
> > + */
> > +struct rb_list {
> > +	struct rb_root root;
> > +	struct list_head head;
> > +	spinlock_t lock;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct vmap_node {
> > +	/* Bookkeeping data of this node. */
> > +	struct rb_list busy;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct vmap_node *nodes, snode;
> > +static __read_mostly unsigned int nr_nodes = 1;
> > +static __read_mostly unsigned int node_size = 1;
> 
> It could be better if calling these global variables a meaningful name,
> e.g vmap_nodes, static_vmap_nodes, nr_vmap_nodes. When I use vim+cscope
> to reference them, it gives me a super long list. Aside from that, a
> simple name often makes me mistake it as a local virable. A weak
> opinion.
> 
I am OK to add "vmap_" prefix:

vmap_nodes;
vmap_nr_nodes;
vmap_node_size;
..

If you are not OK with that, feel free to propose other variants.

Thank you!

--
Uladzislau Rezki


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-11 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-29  8:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: vmalloc: Add va_alloc() helper Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  5:51   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 15:06     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: vmalloc: Rename adjust_va_to_fit_type() function Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  5:51   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:27     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: vmalloc: Move vmap_init_free_space() down in vmalloc.c Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  5:52   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:29     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 14:30   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30 14:48     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  2:17   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07  9:38     ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07  9:40       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  9:39     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  9:58       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08  1:51         ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08  4:43           ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08  5:01             ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08  6:44               ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 11:25                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-08 11:38                   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 13:23                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11  2:38   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 16:53     ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2023-09-12 13:19       ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global purge_vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11  2:57   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:00     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  6:04   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 19:16     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  0:06       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07  9:33         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11  3:25   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:10     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:21       ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vread_iter Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11  3:58   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 18:16     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:42       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:42         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-14  3:02           ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14  3:36           ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14  3:38             ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 10:59       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:38         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:02   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:32     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes/node_size based on CPU-cores Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:03   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:31     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-31  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Baoquan He
2023-08-31 16:26   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 14:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 19:53   ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-05  6:53     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-06 20:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-09-07  9:15   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZP9GGW/q0nCFelLf@pc636 \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).