linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: marek.vasut@gmail.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] PCI: rcar: Move the inbound index check
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:52:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190816105227.GB23677@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809175741.7066-1-marek.vasut@gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:57:39PM +0200, marek.vasut@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> 
> Since the $idx variable value is stored across multiple calls to
> rcar_pcie_inbound_ranges() function, and the $idx value is used to
> index registers which are written, subsequent calls might cause
> the $idx value to be high enough to trigger writes into nonexistent
> registers.

Can this really happen ? 'index' is initialized to 0 in
rcar_pci_parse_map_dma_ranges() and, through rcar_pcie_inbound_ranges()
return value, it bails out on idx overrun, we can argue this patch
improves robustness but I do not think it is fixing anything.

Lorenzo

> Fix this by moving the $idx value check to the beginning of the loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> V2: New patch
> V3: Adjust the check to idx >= MAX_NR_INBOUND_MAPS - 1
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> index f6a669a9af41..56a6433eb70b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -1048,6 +1048,10 @@ static int rcar_pcie_inbound_ranges(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
>  	mask &= ~0xf;
>  
>  	while (cpu_addr < cpu_end) {
> +		if (idx >= MAX_NR_INBOUND_MAPS - 1) {
> +			dev_err(pcie->dev, "Failed to map inbound regions!\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
>  		/*
>  		 * Set up 64-bit inbound regions as the range parser doesn't
>  		 * distinguish between 32 and 64-bit types.
> @@ -1067,11 +1071,6 @@ static int rcar_pcie_inbound_ranges(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
>  		pci_addr += size;
>  		cpu_addr += size;
>  		idx += 2;
> -
> -		if (idx > MAX_NR_INBOUND_MAPS) {
> -			dev_err(pcie->dev, "Failed to map inbound regions!\n");
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		}
>  	}
>  	*index = idx;
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-16 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-09 17:57 [PATCH V3 1/3] PCI: rcar: Move the inbound index check marek.vasut
2019-08-09 17:57 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] PCI: rcar: Do not abort on too many inbound dma-ranges marek.vasut
2019-08-16 13:23   ` Simon Horman
2019-08-16 13:28     ` Marek Vasut
2019-08-16 13:38       ` Simon Horman
2019-08-16 17:41         ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-21 10:18       ` Andrew Murray
2019-10-26 18:03         ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-26 20:36           ` Andrew Murray
2019-10-26 21:06             ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-06 23:37             ` Marek Vasut
2019-11-07 14:19               ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-16 15:48                 ` Marek Vasut
2019-11-18 18:42                   ` Robin Murphy
2019-12-22  7:46                     ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-16 15:00   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-16 15:10     ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-16 15:26       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-16 15:29         ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-16 16:18           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-16 18:12             ` Rob Herring
2019-10-16 18:17               ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-16 20:25                 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-16 21:15                   ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-16 22:26                     ` Rob Herring
2019-10-16 22:33                       ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-17  7:06                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-17 10:55                           ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-17 13:06                             ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-17 14:00                               ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-17 14:36                                 ` Rob Herring
2019-10-17 15:01                                   ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-18  9:53                                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-18 12:22                                       ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-18 12:53                                         ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-18 14:26                                           ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-18 15:44                                             ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-18 16:44                                               ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-18 17:35                                                 ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-18 18:44                                                   ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-21  8:32                                                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-19 12:10                                                     ` Robin Murphy
2019-10-18 10:06                         ` Andrew Murray
2019-10-18 10:17                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-18 11:40                             ` Andrew Murray
2019-08-09 17:57 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] PCI: rcar: Recalculate inbound range alignment for each controller entry marek.vasut
2019-10-21 10:39   ` Andrew Murray
2019-08-16 10:52 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-08-16 10:59   ` [PATCH V3 1/3] PCI: rcar: Move the inbound index check Marek Vasut
2019-08-16 11:10     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-15 20:14 ` Marek Vasut
2019-10-21 10:11 ` Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190816105227.GB23677@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).