linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: per-cpu thoughts
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:57:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0100016910c70299-07cf38ee-a0b5-4bd0-9fd5-5c9bb6c1acbb-000000@email.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+HfNgwAFevO6cXMU_FjQtLJ=uxHmmWM8c-VWu58SMkKXgVyQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 959 bytes --]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Björn Töpel wrote:

> I noticed that RISC-V currently uses the generic one. Has there been
> any work on moving to a RISC-V specific impl, based on the
> A-extensions, similar to what aarch64 does? Would that make sense?

arm64 does not really handle that effectively. Intel has a single
instruction to increment a counter without requiring full consistency
guarantees like full blown atomics. The single instruction is important
to guarantee that the processing cannot be interrupted and thus there is
no need to disable preemption or interrupts.

What you want is some special instruction that can be executed in a cycle
or so and dedicate a register to the per cpu base address (comparable to
the
segment register on intel) so that you can do

	inc [per cpu register + offset]

in one cycle on an arbitrary hardware thread. That way you can keep
statistics effectvely and without contention. The vmstat subsystem is
based on that.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-21 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-20 19:57 per-cpu thoughts Björn Töpel
2019-02-21 15:57 ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2019-02-21 16:28 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-02-21 17:24   ` Björn Töpel
2019-02-21 17:49     ` Paul Walmsley
2019-02-21 19:40       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-02-22 15:04         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-22 15:36           ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-02-22 15:56             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-22 19:47               ` Björn Töpel
2019-02-22 19:56                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-28 12:20                   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-02-28 17:58                     ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-28 18:42                       ` Paul Walmsley
2019-02-28 19:09                         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-28 20:21                           ` Paul Walmsley
2019-03-01  1:13                             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-08  7:17                   ` Björn Töpel
2019-03-11 13:22                     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-03-11 14:48                       ` Björn Töpel
2019-03-11 14:56                         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-11 15:05                           ` Björn Töpel
2019-03-11 15:26                             ` Paul Walmsley
2019-03-11 16:48                               ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-11 18:39                                 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-03-12 11:23                                   ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-12 16:01                                     ` Paul Walmsley
2019-03-12 17:34                                       ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-12  4:26                               ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-12 14:21                                 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-03-12 17:42                                   ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-12 17:59                                     ` Gary Guo
2019-03-13 18:58                                       ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-13 20:15                                     ` Paul Walmsley
2019-03-22 14:51                               ` Nick Kossifidis
2019-03-22 17:57                                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-11 15:51                             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-11 16:35                               ` Björn Töpel
2019-03-12  4:22                                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-02-22 19:48             ` Björn Töpel
2019-02-22 20:53               ` Nick Kossifidis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0100016910c70299-07cf38ee-a0b5-4bd0-9fd5-5c9bb6c1acbb-000000@email.amazonses.com \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).