linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
To: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>,
	Kevin.Barnett@microchip.com, scott.teel@microchip.com,
	Justin.Lindley@microchip.com, scott.benesh@microchip.com,
	gerry.morong@microchip.com, mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com,
	hch@infradead.org, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	joseph.szczypek@hpe.com, POSWALD@suse.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/25] smartpqi: add support for raid5 and raid6 writes
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:44:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15d80793c64ffd044da1e40334acfd8ad8988fb9.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160763248354.26927.303366932249508542.stgit@brunhilda>

On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 14:34 -0600, Don Brace wrote:
> * Add in new IU definition.
> * Add in support raid5 and raid6 writes.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.teel@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h      |   39 +++++
>  drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c |  247
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> index d486a2ec3045..e9844210c4a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct pqi_device_capability {
>  };
>  
>  #define PQI_MAX_EMBEDDED_SG_DESCRIPTORS                4
> +#define PQI_MAX_EMBEDDED_R56_SG_DESCRIPTORS    3
>  
>  struct pqi_raid_path_request {
>         struct pqi_iu_header header;
> @@ -312,6 +313,39 @@ struct pqi_aio_path_request {
>                 sg_descriptors[PQI_MAX_EMBEDDED_SG_DESCRIPTORS];
>  };
>  
> +#define PQI_RAID56_XFER_LIMIT_4K       0x1000 /* 4Kib */
> +#define PQI_RAID56_XFER_LIMIT_8K       0x2000 /* 8Kib */

You don't seem to use these, and you'll remove them again in patch
06/25.

> +struct pqi_aio_r56_path_request {
> +       struct pqi_iu_header header;
> +       __le16  request_id;
> +       __le16  volume_id;              /* ID of the RAID volume */
> +       __le32  data_it_nexus;          /* IT nexus for the data
> drive */
> +       __le32  p_parity_it_nexus;      /* IT nexus for the P parity
> drive */
> +       __le32  q_parity_it_nexus;      /* IT nexus for the Q parity
> drive */
> +       __le32  data_length;            /* total bytes to read/write
> */
> +       u8      data_direction : 2;
> +       u8      partial : 1;
> +       u8      mem_type : 1;           /* 0b: PCIe, 1b: DDR */
> +       u8      fence : 1;
> +       u8      encryption_enable : 1;
> +       u8      reserved : 2;
> +       u8      task_attribute : 3;
> +       u8      command_priority : 4;
> +       u8      reserved1 : 1;
> +       __le16  data_encryption_key_index;
> +       u8      cdb[16];
> +       __le16  error_index;
> +       u8      num_sg_descriptors;
> +       u8      cdb_length;
> +       u8      xor_multiplier;
> +       u8      reserved2[3];
> +       __le32  encrypt_tweak_lower;
> +       __le32  encrypt_tweak_upper;
> +       u8      row;                    /* row = logical lba/blocks
> per row */
> +       u8      reserved3[8];
> +       struct pqi_sg_descriptor
> sg_descriptors[PQI_MAX_EMBEDDED_R56_SG_DESCRIPTORS];
> +};
> +
>  struct pqi_io_response {
>         struct pqi_iu_header header;
>         __le16  request_id;
> @@ -484,6 +518,8 @@ struct pqi_raid_error_info {
>  #define PQI_REQUEST_IU_TASK_MANAGEMENT                 0x13
>  #define PQI_REQUEST_IU_RAID_PATH_IO                    0x14
>  #define PQI_REQUEST_IU_AIO_PATH_IO                     0x15
> +#define PQI_REQUEST_IU_AIO_PATH_RAID5_IO               0x18
> +#define PQI_REQUEST_IU_AIO_PATH_RAID6_IO               0x19
>  #define PQI_REQUEST_IU_GENERAL_ADMIN                   0x60
>  #define PQI_REQUEST_IU_REPORT_VENDOR_EVENT_CONFIG      0x72
>  #define PQI_REQUEST_IU_SET_VENDOR_EVENT_CONFIG         0x73
> @@ -1179,6 +1215,7 @@ struct pqi_ctrl_info {
>         u16             max_inbound_iu_length_per_firmware;
>         u16             max_inbound_iu_length;
>         unsigned int    max_sg_per_iu;
> +       unsigned int    max_sg_per_r56_iu;
>         void            *admin_queue_memory_base;
>         u32             admin_queue_memory_length;
>         dma_addr_t      admin_queue_memory_base_dma_handle;
> @@ -1210,6 +1247,8 @@ struct pqi_ctrl_info {
>         u8              soft_reset_handshake_supported : 1;
>         u8              raid_iu_timeout_supported: 1;
>         u8              tmf_iu_timeout_supported: 1;
> +       u8              enable_r5_writes : 1;
> +       u8              enable_r6_writes : 1;
>  
>         struct list_head scsi_device_list;
>         spinlock_t      scsi_device_list_lock;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> index 6bcb037ae9d7..c813cec10003 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ static int pqi_aio_submit_io(struct pqi_ctrl_info
> *ctrl_info,
>         struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, u32 aio_handle, u8 *cdb,
>         unsigned int cdb_length, struct pqi_queue_group *queue_group,
>         struct pqi_encryption_info *encryption_info, bool
> raid_bypass);
> +static int pqi_aio_submit_r56_write_io(struct pqi_ctrl_info
> *ctrl_info,
> +       struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, struct pqi_queue_group *queue_group,
> +       struct pqi_encryption_info *encryption_info, struct
> pqi_scsi_dev *device,
> +       struct pqi_scsi_dev_raid_map_data *rmd);
>  static void pqi_ofa_ctrl_quiesce(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info);
>  static void pqi_ofa_ctrl_unquiesce(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info);
>  static int pqi_ofa_ctrl_restart(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info);
> @@ -2237,7 +2241,8 @@ static inline void pqi_set_encryption_info(
>   * Attempt to perform RAID bypass mapping for a logical volume I/O.
>   */
>  
> -static bool pqi_aio_raid_level_supported(struct
> pqi_scsi_dev_raid_map_data *rmd)
> +static bool pqi_aio_raid_level_supported(struct pqi_ctrl_info
> *ctrl_info,
> +       struct pqi_scsi_dev_raid_map_data *rmd)
>  {
>         bool is_supported = true;
>  
> @@ -2245,13 +2250,14 @@ static bool
> pqi_aio_raid_level_supported(struct pqi_scsi_dev_raid_map_data *rmd)
>         case SA_RAID_0:
>                 break;
>         case SA_RAID_1:
> -               if (rmd->is_write)
> -                       is_supported = false;
> +               is_supported = false;

You disable RAID1 READs with this patch. I can see you fix it again in
05/25, still it looks wrong.

>                 break;
>         case SA_RAID_5:
> -               fallthrough;
> +               if (rmd->is_write && !ctrl_info->enable_r5_writes)
> +                       is_supported = false;
> +               break;
>         case SA_RAID_6:
> -               if (rmd->is_write)
> +               if (rmd->is_write && !ctrl_info->enable_r6_writes)
>                         is_supported = false;
>                 break;
>         case SA_RAID_ADM:
> @@ -2526,6 +2532,26 @@ static int pqi_calc_aio_r5_or_r6(struct
> pqi_scsi_dev_raid_map_data *rmd,
>                 rmd->total_disks_per_row)) +
>                 (rmd->map_row * rmd->total_disks_per_row) + rmd-
> > first_column;
>  
> +       if (rmd->is_write) {
> +               rmd->p_index = (rmd->map_row * rmd-
> > total_disks_per_row) + rmd->data_disks_per_row;
> +               rmd->p_parity_it_nexus = raid_map->disk_data[rmd-
> > p_index].aio_handle;

I suppose you have made sure rmd->p_index can't be larger than the
size of raid_map->disk_data. A comment explaining that would be helpful
for the reader though.


> +               if (rmd->raid_level == SA_RAID_6) {
> +                       rmd->q_index = (rmd->map_row * rmd-
> > total_disks_per_row) +
> +                               (rmd->data_disks_per_row + 1);
> +                       rmd->q_parity_it_nexus = raid_map-
> > disk_data[rmd->q_index].aio_handle;
> +                       rmd->xor_mult = raid_map->disk_data[rmd-
> > map_index].xor_mult[1];

See above.

> +               }
> +               if (rmd->blocks_per_row == 0)
> +                       return PQI_RAID_BYPASS_INELIGIBLE;
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> +               tmpdiv = rmd->first_block;
> +               do_div(tmpdiv, rmd->blocks_per_row);
> +               rmd->row = tmpdiv;
> +#else
> +               rmd->row = rmd->first_block / rmd->blocks_per_row;
> +#endif

Why not always use do_div()?

> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2567,7 +2593,7 @@ static int
> pqi_raid_bypass_submit_scsi_cmd(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>  
>         rmd.raid_level = device->raid_level;
>  
> -       if (!pqi_aio_raid_level_supported(&rmd))
> +       if (!pqi_aio_raid_level_supported(ctrl_info, &rmd))
>                 return PQI_RAID_BYPASS_INELIGIBLE;
>  
>         if (unlikely(rmd.block_cnt == 0))
> @@ -2587,7 +2613,8 @@ static int
> pqi_raid_bypass_submit_scsi_cmd(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>         } else if (device->raid_level == SA_RAID_ADM) {
>                 rc = pqi_calc_aio_raid_adm(&rmd, device);
>         } else if ((device->raid_level == SA_RAID_5 ||
> -               device->raid_level == SA_RAID_6) &&
> rmd.layout_map_count > 1) {
> +               device->raid_level == SA_RAID_6) &&
> +               (rmd.layout_map_count > 1 || rmd.is_write)) {
>                 rc = pqi_calc_aio_r5_or_r6(&rmd, raid_map);
>                 if (rc)
>                         return PQI_RAID_BYPASS_INELIGIBLE;
> @@ -2622,9 +2649,27 @@ static int
> pqi_raid_bypass_submit_scsi_cmd(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>                 encryption_info_ptr = NULL;
>         }
>  
> -       return pqi_aio_submit_io(ctrl_info, scmd, rmd.aio_handle,
> +       if (rmd.is_write) {
> +               switch (device->raid_level) {
> +               case SA_RAID_0:
> +                       return pqi_aio_submit_io(ctrl_info, scmd,
> rmd.aio_handle,
>                                 rmd.cdb, rmd.cdb_length, queue_group,
>                                 encryption_info_ptr, true);
> +               case SA_RAID_5:
> +               case SA_RAID_6:
> +                       return pqi_aio_submit_r56_write_io(ctrl_info,
> scmd, queue_group,
> +                                       encryption_info_ptr, device,
> &rmd);
> +               default:
> +                       return pqi_aio_submit_io(ctrl_info, scmd,
> rmd.aio_handle,
> +                               rmd.cdb, rmd.cdb_length, queue_group,
> +                               encryption_info_ptr, true);
> +               }
> +       } else {
> +               return pqi_aio_submit_io(ctrl_info, scmd,
> rmd.aio_handle,
> +                       rmd.cdb, rmd.cdb_length, queue_group,
> +                       encryption_info_ptr, true);
> +       }
> +
>  }
>  
>  #define PQI_STATUS_IDLE                0x0
> @@ -4844,6 +4889,12 @@ static void
> pqi_calculate_queue_resources(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info)
>                 PQI_OPERATIONAL_IQ_ELEMENT_LENGTH) /
>                 sizeof(struct pqi_sg_descriptor)) +
>                 PQI_MAX_EMBEDDED_SG_DESCRIPTORS;
> +
> +       ctrl_info->max_sg_per_r56_iu =
> +               ((ctrl_info->max_inbound_iu_length -
> +               PQI_OPERATIONAL_IQ_ELEMENT_LENGTH) /
> +               sizeof(struct pqi_sg_descriptor)) +
> +               PQI_MAX_EMBEDDED_R56_SG_DESCRIPTORS;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pqi_set_sg_descriptor(
> @@ -4931,6 +4982,44 @@ static int pqi_build_raid_sg_list(struct
> pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int pqi_build_aio_r56_sg_list(struct pqi_ctrl_info
> *ctrl_info,
> +       struct pqi_aio_r56_path_request *request, struct scsi_cmnd
> *scmd,
> +       struct pqi_io_request *io_request)
> +{
> +       u16 iu_length;
> +       int sg_count;
> +       bool chained;
> +       unsigned int num_sg_in_iu;
> +       struct scatterlist *sg;
> +       struct pqi_sg_descriptor *sg_descriptor;
> +
> +       sg_count = scsi_dma_map(scmd);
> +       if (sg_count < 0)
> +               return sg_count;
> +
> +       iu_length = offsetof(struct pqi_aio_r56_path_request,
> sg_descriptors) -
> +               PQI_REQUEST_HEADER_LENGTH;
> +       num_sg_in_iu = 0;
> +
> +       if (sg_count == 0)
> +               goto out;

An if {} block would be better readable here.

> +
> +       sg = scsi_sglist(scmd);
> +       sg_descriptor = request->sg_descriptors;
> +
> +       num_sg_in_iu = pqi_build_sg_list(sg_descriptor, sg, sg_count,
> io_request,
> +               ctrl_info->max_sg_per_r56_iu, &chained);
> +
> +       request->partial = chained;
> +       iu_length += num_sg_in_iu * sizeof(*sg_descriptor);
> +
> +out:
> +       put_unaligned_le16(iu_length, &request->header.iu_length);
> +       request->num_sg_descriptors = num_sg_in_iu;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int pqi_build_aio_sg_list(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>         struct pqi_aio_path_request *request, struct scsi_cmnd *scmd,
>         struct pqi_io_request *io_request)
> @@ -5335,6 +5424,88 @@ static int pqi_aio_submit_io(struct
> pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int pqi_aio_submit_r56_write_io(struct pqi_ctrl_info
> *ctrl_info,
> +       struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, struct pqi_queue_group *queue_group,
> +       struct pqi_encryption_info *encryption_info, struct
> pqi_scsi_dev *device,
> +       struct pqi_scsi_dev_raid_map_data *rmd)
> +{
> +       int rc;
> +       struct pqi_io_request *io_request;
> +       struct pqi_aio_r56_path_request *r56_request;
> +
> +       io_request = pqi_alloc_io_request(ctrl_info);
> +       io_request->io_complete_callback = pqi_aio_io_complete;
> +       io_request->scmd = scmd;
> +       io_request->raid_bypass = true;
> +
> +       r56_request = io_request->iu;
> +       memset(r56_request, 0, offsetof(struct
> pqi_aio_r56_path_request, sg_descriptors));
> +
> +       if (device->raid_level == SA_RAID_5 || device->raid_level ==
> SA_RAID_51)
> +               r56_request->header.iu_type =
> PQI_REQUEST_IU_AIO_PATH_RAID5_IO;
> +       else
> +               r56_request->header.iu_type =
> PQI_REQUEST_IU_AIO_PATH_RAID6_IO;
> +
> +       put_unaligned_le16(*(u16 *)device->scsi3addr & 0x3fff,
> &r56_request->volume_id);
> +       put_unaligned_le32(rmd->aio_handle, &r56_request-
> > data_it_nexus);
> +       put_unaligned_le32(rmd->p_parity_it_nexus, &r56_request-
> > p_parity_it_nexus);
> +       if (rmd->raid_level == SA_RAID_6) {
> +               put_unaligned_le32(rmd->q_parity_it_nexus,
> &r56_request->q_parity_it_nexus);
> +               r56_request->xor_multiplier = rmd->xor_mult;
> +       }
> +       put_unaligned_le32(scsi_bufflen(scmd), &r56_request-
> > data_length);
> +       r56_request->task_attribute = SOP_TASK_ATTRIBUTE_SIMPLE;
> +       put_unaligned_le64(rmd->row, &r56_request->row);
> +
> +       put_unaligned_le16(io_request->index, &r56_request-
> > request_id);
> +       r56_request->error_index = r56_request->request_id;
> +
> +       if (rmd->cdb_length > sizeof(r56_request->cdb))
> +               rmd->cdb_length = sizeof(r56_request->cdb);
> +       r56_request->cdb_length = rmd->cdb_length;
> +       memcpy(r56_request->cdb, rmd->cdb, rmd->cdb_length);
> +
> +       switch (scmd->sc_data_direction) {
> +       case DMA_TO_DEVICE:
> +               r56_request->data_direction = SOP_READ_FLAG;
> +               break;

I wonder how it would be possible that sc_data_direction is anything
else but DMA_TO_DEVICE here. AFAICS we will only reach this code for
WRITE commands. Add a comment, please.


> +       case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
> +               r56_request->data_direction = SOP_WRITE_FLAG;
> +               break;
> +       case DMA_NONE:
> +               r56_request->data_direction = SOP_NO_DIRECTION_FLAG;
> +               break;
> +       case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
> +               r56_request->data_direction = SOP_BIDIRECTIONAL;
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               dev_err(&ctrl_info->pci_dev->dev,
> +                       "unknown data direction: %d\n",
> +                       scmd->sc_data_direction);
> +               break;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (encryption_info) {
> +               r56_request->encryption_enable = true;
> +               put_unaligned_le16(encryption_info-
> > data_encryption_key_index,
> +                               &r56_request-
> > data_encryption_key_index);
> +               put_unaligned_le32(encryption_info-
> > encrypt_tweak_lower,
> +                               &r56_request->encrypt_tweak_lower);
> +               put_unaligned_le32(encryption_info-
> > encrypt_tweak_upper,
> +                               &r56_request->encrypt_tweak_upper);
> +       }
> +
> +       rc = pqi_build_aio_r56_sg_list(ctrl_info, r56_request, scmd,
> io_request);
> +       if (rc) {
> +               pqi_free_io_request(io_request);
> +               return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
> +       }
> +
> +       pqi_start_io(ctrl_info, queue_group, AIO_PATH, io_request);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u16 pqi_get_hw_queue(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
>         struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>  {
> @@ -6298,6 +6469,60 @@ static ssize_t pqi_lockup_action_store(struct
> device *dev,
>         return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t pqi_host_enable_r5_writes_show(struct device *dev,
> +       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buffer)
> +{
> +       struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev);
> +       struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);
> +
> +       return scnprintf(buffer, 10, "%hhx\n", ctrl_info-
> > enable_r5_writes);

"%hhx" is deprecated, see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190914015858.7c76e036@lwn.net/T/


> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t pqi_host_enable_r5_writes_store(struct device *dev,
> +       struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buffer, size_t
> count)
> +{
> +       struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev);
> +       struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);
> +       u8 set_r5_writes = 0;
> +
> +       if (kstrtou8(buffer, 0, &set_r5_writes))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (set_r5_writes > 0)
> +               set_r5_writes = 1;
> +
> +       ctrl_info->enable_r5_writes = set_r5_writes;
> +
> +       return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t pqi_host_enable_r6_writes_show(struct device *dev,
> +       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buffer)
> +{
> +       struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev);
> +       struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);
> +
> +       return scnprintf(buffer, 10, "%hhx\n", ctrl_info-
> > enable_r6_writes);

See above

> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t pqi_host_enable_r6_writes_store(struct device *dev,
> +       struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buffer, size_t
> count)
> +{
> +       struct Scsi_Host *shost = class_to_shost(dev);
> +       struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);
> +       u8 set_r6_writes = 0;
> +
> +       if (kstrtou8(buffer, 0, &set_r6_writes))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (set_r6_writes > 0)
> +               set_r6_writes = 1;
> +
> +       ctrl_info->enable_r6_writes = set_r6_writes;
> +
> +       return count;
> +}
> +
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(driver_version, 0444, pqi_driver_version_show,
> NULL);
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(firmware_version, 0444,
> pqi_firmware_version_show, NULL);
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(model, 0444, pqi_model_show, NULL);
> @@ -6306,6 +6531,10 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(vendor, 0444,
> pqi_vendor_show, NULL);
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, 0200, NULL, pqi_host_rescan_store);
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(lockup_action, 0644, pqi_lockup_action_show,
>         pqi_lockup_action_store);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(enable_r5_writes, 0644,
> +       pqi_host_enable_r5_writes_show,
> pqi_host_enable_r5_writes_store);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(enable_r6_writes, 0644,
> +       pqi_host_enable_r6_writes_show,
> pqi_host_enable_r6_writes_store);
>  
>  static struct device_attribute *pqi_shost_attrs[] = {
>         &dev_attr_driver_version,
> @@ -6315,6 +6544,8 @@ static struct device_attribute
> *pqi_shost_attrs[] = {
>         &dev_attr_vendor,
>         &dev_attr_rescan,
>         &dev_attr_lockup_action,
> +       &dev_attr_enable_r5_writes,
> +       &dev_attr_enable_r6_writes,
>         NULL
>  };
>  
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-07 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 20:34 [PATCH V3 00/25] smartpqi updates Don Brace
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 01/25] smartpqi: add support for product id Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:43   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 02/25] smartpqi: refactor aio submission code Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:43   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 03/25] smartpqi: refactor build sg list code Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:43   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 04/25] smartpqi: add support for raid5 and raid6 writes Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck [this message]
2021-01-08 22:56     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-13 10:26       ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 05/25] smartpqi: add support for raid1 writes Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-09 16:56     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 06/25] smartpqi: add support for BMIC sense feature cmd and feature bits Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-11 17:22     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-22 16:45     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-22 19:04       ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 07/25] smartpqi: update AIO Sub Page 0x02 support Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-11 20:53     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 08/25] smartpqi: add support for long firmware version Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:45   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-11 22:25     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-22 20:01     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 09/25] smartpqi: align code with oob driver Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:13   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 10/25] smartpqi: add stream detection Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:14   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-15 21:58     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 11/25] smartpqi: add host level stream detection enable Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:13   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-12 20:28     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 12/25] smartpqi: enable support for NVMe encryption Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:14   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 13/25] smartpqi: disable write_same for nvme hba disks Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:13   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 14/25] smartpqi: fix driver synchronization issues Don Brace
2021-01-07 23:32   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-08  4:13     ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-01-15 21:13     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-27 23:01     ` Don.Brace
     [not found]       ` <c1e6b199f5ccda5ccec5223dfcbd1fba22171c86.camel@suse.com>
2021-02-01 22:47         ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 15/25] smartpqi: fix host qdepth limit Don Brace
2020-12-14 17:54   ` Paul Menzel
2020-12-15 20:23     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-07 23:43       ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-15 21:17         ` Don.Brace
2021-01-19 10:33           ` John Garry
2021-01-19 14:12             ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-19 17:43               ` Paul Menzel
2021-01-20 16:42               ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-20 17:03                 ` Don.Brace
2021-01-20 18:35                 ` Martin Wilck
2021-02-10 15:27             ` Don.Brace
2021-02-10 15:42               ` John Garry
2021-02-10 16:29                 ` Don.Brace
2021-03-29 21:15                   ` Paul Menzel
2021-03-29 21:16                     ` Paul Menzel
2021-03-30 14:37                       ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 16/25] smartpqi: convert snprintf to scnprintf Don Brace
2021-01-07 23:51   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 17/25] smartpqi: change timing of release of QRM memory during OFA Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:14   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-27 17:46     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 18/25] smartpqi: return busy indication for IOCTLs when ofa is active Don Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 19/25] smartpqi: add phy id support for the physical drives Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:03   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 20/25] smartpqi: update sas initiator_port_protocols and target_port_protocols Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:12   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 21/25] smartpqi: add additional logging for LUN resets Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:27   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-25 17:09     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 22/25] smartpqi: update enclosure identifier in sysf Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:30   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-25 17:13     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-25 19:44       ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-25 20:36         ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 23/25] smartpqi: correct system hangs when resuming from hibernation Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:34   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-27 17:39     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-27 17:45       ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 24/25] smartpqi: add new pci ids Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:35   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 25/25] smartpqi: update version to 2.1.6-005 Don Brace
2020-12-21 14:31 ` [PATCH V3 00/25] smartpqi updates Donald Buczek
     [not found]   ` <SN6PR11MB2848D8C9DF9856A2B7AA69ACE1C00@SN6PR11MB2848.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-12-22 13:13     ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-28 15:57       ` Don.Brace
2020-12-28 19:25         ` Don.Brace
2020-12-28 22:36           ` Donald Buczek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15d80793c64ffd044da1e40334acfd8ad8988fb9.camel@suse.com \
    --to=mwilck@suse.com \
    --cc=Justin.Lindley@microchip.com \
    --cc=Kevin.Barnett@microchip.com \
    --cc=POSWALD@suse.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microchip.com \
    --cc=gerry.morong@microchip.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=joseph.szczypek@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com \
    --cc=scott.benesh@microchip.com \
    --cc=scott.teel@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).