From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:27:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181013222756.2e9ca459@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181013105646.5147-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 21:56:44 +1100
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
> That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
>
> That would be fine if it was only used to describe the user-visible
> register state of a process, but it's also the struct we use in the
> kernel to describe the registers saved in an interrupt frame.
>
> We'd like more flexibility in the content (and possibly layout) of the
> kernel version of the struct, but currently that's not possible.
>
> So split the definition into a user-visible definition which remains
> unchanged, and a kernel internal one.
>
> At the moment they're still identical, and we check that at build
> time. That's because we have code (in ptrace etc.) that assumes that
> they are the same. We will fix that code in future patches, and then
> we can break the strict symmetry between the two structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Yeah this looks much better than my int_frame thing, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-13 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-13 10:56 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs Michael Ellerman
2018-10-13 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/ptrace: Don't use sizeof(struct pt_regs) in ptrace code Michael Ellerman
2018-10-13 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/64: Interrupts save PPR on stack rather than thread_struct Michael Ellerman
2018-10-13 12:27 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2018-10-15 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs Michael Ellerman
2018-10-14 6:36 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2018-10-15 11:08 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-15 12:39 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2018-10-16 10:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-15 4:01 ` [1/3] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181013222756.2e9ca459@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).