linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [1/3] powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:01:13 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42YPrB1H6nz9sj2@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181013105646.5147-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>

On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 10:56:44 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We use a shared definition for struct pt_regs in uapi/asm/ptrace.h.
> That means the layout of the structure is ABI, ie. we can't change it.
> 
> That would be fine if it was only used to describe the user-visible
> register state of a process, but it's also the struct we use in the
> kernel to describe the registers saved in an interrupt frame.
> 
> We'd like more flexibility in the content (and possibly layout) of the
> kernel version of the struct, but currently that's not possible.
> 
> So split the definition into a user-visible definition which remains
> unchanged, and a kernel internal one.
> 
> At the moment they're still identical, and we check that at build
> time. That's because we have code (in ptrace etc.) that assumes that
> they are the same. We will fix that code in future patches, and then
> we can break the strict symmetry between the two structs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

Series applied to powerpc next.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/002af9391bfbe84f8e491bb10bd9c6

cheers

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-15  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-13 10:56 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs Michael Ellerman
2018-10-13 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/ptrace: Don't use sizeof(struct pt_regs) in ptrace code Michael Ellerman
2018-10-13 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/64: Interrupts save PPR on stack rather than thread_struct Michael Ellerman
2018-10-13 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs Nicholas Piggin
2018-10-15 12:02   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-14  6:36 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2018-10-15 11:08   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-15 12:39     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2018-10-16 10:50       ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-15  4:01 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42YPrB1H6nz9sj2@ozlabs.org \
    --to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).