From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Motohiro Kosaki <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:19:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327400349.2614.10.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120118142005.GB10105@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 15:20 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> do_exit() is different because it can not handle the spurious wakeup.
> Well, may be we can? we can simply do
>
> for (;;) {
> tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> schedule();
> }
>
> __schedule() can't race with ttwu() once it takes rq->lock. If the
> exiting task is deactivated, finish_task_switch() will see EXIT_DEAD.
TASK_DEAD, right?
> Unless I missed something, the only problem is preempt_disable(),
> but schedule_debug() checks ->exit_state.
>
> OTOH, if we fix this race then probably schedule_debug() should
> check state == EXIT_DEAD instead.
Hmm, interesting. On the up side that removes the need for that inf loop
after BUG, down side is of course that we loose the BUG itself too. Now
I'm not too sure we actually care about that, a task spinning at 100% in
x state should be fairly obvious borkage and its not like we hit this
thing very often.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-24 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-22 0:42 [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition Yasunori Goto
2011-12-22 2:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-22 8:22 ` Yasunori Goto
2011-12-22 20:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-23 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-23 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-26 8:23 ` Yasunori Goto
2011-12-26 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-27 6:48 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-06 10:22 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-06 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-06 12:01 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-06 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-06 14:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-06 14:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-07 1:31 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-16 11:51 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-16 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-17 8:40 ` Yasunori Goto
2012-01-17 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-17 15:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-18 14:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-24 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-01-24 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 17:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-25 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-25 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-25 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-26 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-27 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-28 12:03 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix ancient race in do_exit() tip-bot for Yasunori Goto
2012-01-28 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-29 16:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-29 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-29 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-29 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-30 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-06 13:48 ` [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-28 21:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-24 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-24 18:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-25 6:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-01-26 21:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-25 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 20:25 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rq->nr_uninterruptible update race tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 5:20 ` Rakib Mullick
2012-01-27 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-27 14:11 ` Rakib Mullick
2012-01-26 21:21 ` [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-27 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-26 6:52 ` Yasunori Goto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327400349.2614.10.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).