linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, matthew.garrett@nebula.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] ACPI: use platform bus as the default bus for _HID enumeration
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:45:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394419503.10554.21.camel@rzhang1-mobl4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6354388.qLqPjcP6yZ@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 19:04 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, March 09, 2014 11:50:37 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:11 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to platform bus,
> > > this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI devices with _HID/_CID to
> > > platform bus by default, unless the device already has a scan handler attached.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c |   28 ----------------------------
> > >  drivers/acpi/scan.c          |   12 ++++++------
> > >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > > index dbfe49e..33376a9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > > @@ -22,24 +22,6 @@
> > >  
> > >  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("platform");
> > >  
> > > -/*
> > > - * The following ACPI IDs are known to be suitable for representing as
> > > - * platform devices.
> > > - */
> > > -static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_platform_device_ids[] = {
> > > -
> > > -	{ "PNP0D40" },
> > > -	{ "ACPI0003" },
> > > -	{ "VPC2004" },
> > > -	{ "BCM4752" },
> > > -
> > > -	/* Intel Smart Sound Technology */
> > > -	{ "INT33C8" },
> > > -	{ "80860F28" },
> > > -
> > > -	{ }
> > > -};
> > > -
> > >  /**
> > >   * acpi_create_platform_device - Create platform device for ACPI device node
> > >   * @adev: ACPI device node to create a platform device for.
> > > @@ -125,13 +107,3 @@ int acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
> > >  	kfree(resources);
> > >  	return 1;
> > >  }
> > > -
> > > -static struct acpi_scan_handler platform_handler = {
> > > -	.ids = acpi_platform_device_ids,
> > > -	.attach = acpi_create_platform_device,
> > > -};
> > > -
> > > -void __init acpi_platform_init(void)
> > > -{
> > > -	acpi_scan_add_handler(&platform_handler);
> > > -}
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > index 5967338..61af32e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > @@ -2022,14 +2022,15 @@ static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(struct acpi_device *device)
> > >  		handler = acpi_scan_match_handler(hwid->id, &devid);
> > >  		if (handler) {
> > >  			ret = handler->attach(device, devid);
> > > -			if (ret > 0) {
> > > +			if (ret > 0)
> > >  				device->handler = handler;
> > > -				break;
> > > -			} else if (ret < 0) {
> > > -				break;
> > > -			}
> > > +			if (ret)
> > > +				goto end;
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > > +end:
> > > +	if (!list_empty(&device->pnp.ids) && !device->handler)
> > > +		acpi_create_platform_device(device, NULL);
> > 
> > I just found a big problem in this proposal, which affects all the
> > optional scan handlers.
> 
> What do you mean by "optional"?  Such that can be compiled out?
> 
yes.

> > The problem is that, if we disable a scan handler, platform device nodes
> > would be created instead by the code above, because there is no scan
> > handler attached for those ACPI nodes.
> 
> If "we disable a scan handled" means "we compile it out", I'm not sure
> why creating platform devices for the device objects in question will
> be incorrect?
> 
take lpss scan handler and 80860F0A device for example,
acpi_lpss_create_device() would invoke lpss_uart_setup() first and then
register 80860F0A as a platform device.
if the lpss scan handler is compiled out, we would do nothing but
register a platform device directly, thus the dw8250_platform_driver
driver is still loaded, but probably breaks.

IMO, we should either have a full functional platform device (if the
scan handler is compiled in) or nothing (if the scan handler is compiled
out).

thanks,
rui
> Rafael
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-10  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  9:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] ACPI: change the way of enumerating PNPACPI/Platform devices Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] ACPI: introduce .match() callback for ACPI scan handler Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] PNPACPI: use whilte list for pnpacpi device enumeration Zhang Rui
2014-03-07  1:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-09  5:29     ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-09 17:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-10  2:24         ` Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] PNPACPI: remove ids that does not comply with the ACPI PNP id rule Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] PNPACPI: remove unsupported serial PNP ids from PNPACPI id list Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] PNPACPI: check and enumerate CMOS RTC devices explicitly Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] ACPI: use platform bus as the default bus for _HID enumeration Zhang Rui
2014-03-02 23:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-03 14:11     ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-03 23:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-04  0:27         ` Zhang, Rui
2014-03-04  0:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-07  1:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-09  5:33               ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-09 17:50                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-09 15:50   ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-09 18:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-10  2:44       ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-10  2:45       ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] Revert "ACPI / PNP: skip ACPI device nodes associated with physical nodes already" Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] PNPACPI: create both PNP and Platform device nodes for PNP0C01/PNP0C02 Zhang Rui
2014-03-03 14:17   ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-03 16:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-26 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] ACPI: change the way of enumerating PNPACPI/Platform devices Matthew Garrett
2014-03-03 13:50   ` Zhang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1394419503.10554.21.camel@rzhang1-mobl4 \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).