linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, matthew.garrett@nebula.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] ACPI: use platform bus as the default bus for _HID enumeration
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:51:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22144944.rXupLb1rjo@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393405874-3266-7-git-send-email-rui.zhang@intel.com>

On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 05:11:12 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
> Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to platform bus,
> this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI devices with _HID/_CID to
> platform bus by default, unless the device already has a scan handler attached.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c |   28 ----------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c          |   12 ++++++------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> index dbfe49e..33376a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> @@ -22,24 +22,6 @@
>  
>  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("platform");
>  
> -/*
> - * The following ACPI IDs are known to be suitable for representing as
> - * platform devices.
> - */
> -static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_platform_device_ids[] = {
> -
> -	{ "PNP0D40" },
> -	{ "ACPI0003" },
> -	{ "VPC2004" },
> -	{ "BCM4752" },
> -
> -	/* Intel Smart Sound Technology */
> -	{ "INT33C8" },
> -	{ "80860F28" },
> -
> -	{ }
> -};
> -
>  /**
>   * acpi_create_platform_device - Create platform device for ACPI device node
>   * @adev: ACPI device node to create a platform device for.
> @@ -125,13 +107,3 @@ int acpi_create_platform_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
>  	kfree(resources);
>  	return 1;
>  }
> -
> -static struct acpi_scan_handler platform_handler = {
> -	.ids = acpi_platform_device_ids,
> -	.attach = acpi_create_platform_device,
> -};
> -
> -void __init acpi_platform_init(void)
> -{
> -	acpi_scan_add_handler(&platform_handler);
> -}
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 5967338..61af32e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -2022,14 +2022,15 @@ static int acpi_scan_attach_handler(struct acpi_device *device)
>  		handler = acpi_scan_match_handler(hwid->id, &devid);
>  		if (handler) {
>  			ret = handler->attach(device, devid);
> -			if (ret > 0) {
> +			if (ret > 0)
>  				device->handler = handler;
> -				break;
> -			} else if (ret < 0) {
> -				break;
> -			}
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto end;
>  		}
>  	}
> +end:
> +	if (!list_empty(&device->pnp.ids) && !device->handler)

I'm a bit concerned that this check will create platform devices for too many
ACPI device objects.  Shouldn't we require that _HID or at least _CID is
present for that?

> +		acpi_create_platform_device(device, NULL);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2185,7 +2186,6 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>  	acpi_pci_root_init();
>  	acpi_pci_link_init();
>  	acpi_processor_init();
> -	acpi_platform_init();
>  	acpi_lpss_init();
>  	acpi_cmos_rtc_init();
>  	acpi_container_init();
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-02 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-26  9:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] ACPI: change the way of enumerating PNPACPI/Platform devices Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] ACPI: introduce .match() callback for ACPI scan handler Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] PNPACPI: use whilte list for pnpacpi device enumeration Zhang Rui
2014-03-07  1:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-09  5:29     ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-09 17:49       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-10  2:24         ` Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] PNPACPI: remove ids that does not comply with the ACPI PNP id rule Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] PNPACPI: remove unsupported serial PNP ids from PNPACPI id list Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] PNPACPI: check and enumerate CMOS RTC devices explicitly Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] ACPI: use platform bus as the default bus for _HID enumeration Zhang Rui
2014-03-02 23:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-03-03 14:11     ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-03 23:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-04  0:27         ` Zhang, Rui
2014-03-04  0:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-07  1:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-09  5:33               ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-09 17:50                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-09 15:50   ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-09 18:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-03-10  2:44       ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-10  2:45       ` Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] Revert "ACPI / PNP: skip ACPI device nodes associated with physical nodes already" Zhang Rui
2014-02-26  9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] PNPACPI: create both PNP and Platform device nodes for PNP0C01/PNP0C02 Zhang Rui
2014-03-03 14:17   ` Zhang Rui
2014-03-03 16:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-26 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] ACPI: change the way of enumerating PNPACPI/Platform devices Matthew Garrett
2014-03-03 13:50   ` Zhang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22144944.rXupLb1rjo@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).