From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Peloquin <markpeloquin@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com,
evms-devel@lists.sf.net
Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.42
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:41:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021013144155.A16668@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F87rkrlMjzmfv2NkkSD000144a9@hotmail.com>; from markpeloquin@hotmail.com on Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 12:14:25PM -0500
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 12:14:25PM -0500, Mark Peloquin wrote:
> I guess it comes down to the point of whether the block layer should evolve
> to also handle volume management generically, or whether volume management
> is separate component that utilizes and works with the block layer.
>
> Linus, if you feel that volume management and the block layer can and should
> be separate components that work together, then EVMS is ready today,
No, it's not. Even if this design stands the code still has many issues.
Neverless even if we don't want separate representations of intermediate
volmes and topmost volumes, the voulme managment should not be part of
a driver but higher leve, i.e. separated out from the evms common library
code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-12 17:14 Linux v2.5.42 Mark Peloquin
2002-10-12 19:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-12 19:37 ` jbradford
2002-10-13 23:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-10-13 12:41 ` [Evms-devel] " Michael Clark
2002-10-13 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 15:16 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-13 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 16:11 ` Brian Jackson
2002-10-13 16:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-13 17:06 ` Brian Jackson
2002-10-13 19:58 ` Mark Hahn
2002-10-13 19:57 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-13 20:26 ` Sean Neakums
2002-10-24 11:45 ` Alexander Kellett
2002-10-13 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-13 20:24 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-10-14 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 22:27 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-10-14 4:55 ` [Evms-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-13 17:46 ` Robert Love
2002-10-13 18:34 ` Brian Jackson
2002-10-14 4:23 ` [Evms-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-14 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 16:18 ` [Evms-devel] " Michael Clark
2002-10-13 17:10 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-13 17:41 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-14 4:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-14 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 14:42 ` Shawn
2002-10-14 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 14:20 ` Shawn
2002-10-14 16:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-14 21:34 ` Shawn
2002-10-14 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 16:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-14 21:47 ` Shawn
2002-10-15 7:42 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-14 21:48 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-14 21:55 ` Shawn
2002-10-14 22:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-14 22:53 ` Shawn
2002-10-14 23:04 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-14 23:16 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-14 23:30 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 0:10 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-10-14 22:57 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-13 13:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-15 17:43 Mark Peloquin
2002-10-15 2:47 Paul McKenney
2002-10-14 17:37 Ben Rafanello
2002-10-12 20:20 Dieter Nützel
2002-10-12 22:19 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-12 4:59 Linus Torvalds
2002-10-12 5:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-12 7:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-12 7:52 ` Andres Salomon
2002-10-12 9:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-12 9:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-12 9:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-12 9:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-12 10:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-12 9:50 ` Matthias Andree
2002-10-12 11:11 ` jw schultz
2002-10-12 11:29 ` Andres Salomon
2002-10-12 11:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-12 11:40 ` jw schultz
2002-10-12 17:47 ` Jon Portnoy
2002-10-12 18:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-13 11:58 ` venom
2002-10-13 12:52 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-12 12:37 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-10-12 13:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-12 19:39 ` Andres Salomon
2002-10-12 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-13 17:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-14 10:01 ` Joe Thornber
2002-10-14 19:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-14 19:32 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-14 22:28 ` Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021013144155.A16668@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=evms-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markpeloquin@hotmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).