linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: ak@suse.de
Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, axboe@suse.de,
	grundler@parisc-linux.org, suparna@in.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex_williamson@hp.com,
	bjorn_helgaas@hp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] block layer support for DMA IOMMU bypass mode II
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:21:36 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030701.172136.48497962.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030702022244.030a8acc.ak@suse.de>

   From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
   Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 02:22:44 +0200

   On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
   "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
   
   > What do you mean?  You map only one 4K chunk, and this is used
   > for all the sub-1K mappings.
   
   How should this work when the 1K mappings are spread all over memory?
   
   Maybe I'm missing something but from James description it sounds like the 
   block layer assumes that it can pass in a sglist with arbitary elements 
   and get it back remapped to continuous DMA addresses.
   
It assumes it can pass in an sglist with arbitrary "virtually
contiguous" elements and get back a continuous DMA address.

The BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDRY defines the IOMMU page size and therefore
what "virtually contiguous" means.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-02  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-01 16:46 [RFC] block layer support for DMA IOMMU bypass mode James Bottomley
2003-07-01 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-01 17:28   ` James Bottomley
2003-07-01 17:42     ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-01 19:22       ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-01 19:56       ` James Bottomley
2003-07-01 17:54     ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-07-01 19:19 ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-01 19:59   ` Alex Williamson
2003-07-01 20:11     ` James Bottomley
2003-07-01 20:03   ` James Bottomley
2003-07-01 23:01     ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-02 15:52       ` James Bottomley
2003-07-01 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-01 23:57 ` [RFC] block layer support for DMA IOMMU bypass mode II Andi Kleen
2003-07-02  0:03   ` David S. Miller
2003-07-02  0:22     ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-02  0:21       ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-07-02 16:53       ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-02 17:19         ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-02 16:55   ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-02 17:20     ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-02 17:37       ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-02 21:16     ` Alan Cox
2003-07-02 23:56       ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-03 20:26         ` Alan Cox
2003-07-03 21:24           ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-03 22:19             ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-08  2:14             ` David S. Miller
2003-07-08 19:34               ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-08 19:47                 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-08 20:10                   ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-08 20:11                   ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-08 22:04                 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-08 22:25                   ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-08 22:23                     ` David S. Miller
2003-07-09 18:55                       ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-23 11:40                       ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-28 11:15                         ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-28 14:59                           ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-30  2:31                           ` Grant Grundler
2003-08-01 21:51                             ` Cliff White
2003-08-01 23:18                               ` reaim now available as osdl-aim-7 - " Cliff White
2003-07-30  4:42                           ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-30  4:51                             ` David S. Miller
2003-07-30 13:06                               ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-30 16:02                               ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-30 16:36                                 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-30 17:18                                   ` James Bottomley
2003-07-30 14:20                             ` James Bottomley
2003-07-23 13:20                       ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-23 15:30                         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030701.172136.48497962.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=alex_williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=bjorn_helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).